Literature DB >> 28748487

Predictions of Speech Chimaera Intelligibility Using Auditory Nerve Mean-Rate and Spike-Timing Neural Cues.

Michael R Wirtzfeld1, Rasha A Ibrahim1, Ian C Bruce2.   

Abstract

Perceptual studies of speech intelligibility have shown that slow variations of acoustic envelope (ENV) in a small set of frequency bands provides adequate information for good perceptual performance in quiet, whereas acoustic temporal fine-structure (TFS) cues play a supporting role in background noise. However, the implications for neural coding are prone to misinterpretation because the mean-rate neural representation can contain recovered ENV cues from cochlear filtering of TFS. We investigated ENV recovery and spike-time TFS coding using objective measures of simulated mean-rate and spike-timing neural representations of chimaeric speech, in which either the ENV or the TFS is replaced by another signal. We (a) evaluated the levels of mean-rate and spike-timing neural information for two categories of chimaeric speech, one retaining ENV cues and the other TFS; (b) examined the level of recovered ENV from cochlear filtering of TFS speech; (c) examined and quantified the contribution to recovered ENV from spike-timing cues using a lateral inhibition network (LIN); and (d) constructed linear regression models with objective measures of mean-rate and spike-timing neural cues and subjective phoneme perception scores from normal-hearing listeners. The mean-rate neural cues from the original ENV and recovered ENV partially accounted for perceptual score variability, with additional variability explained by the recovered ENV from the LIN-processed TFS speech. The best model predictions of chimaeric speech intelligibility were found when both the mean-rate and spike-timing neural cues were included, providing further evidence that spike-time coding of TFS cues is important for intelligibility when the speech envelope is degraded.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chimaera; envelope; intelligibility; mean-rate; recovered envelope; spike-timing; temporal fine structure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28748487      PMCID: PMC5612921          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-017-0627-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  61 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Physiological assessment of contrast-enhancing frequency shaping and multiband compression in hearing aids.

Authors:  Ian C Bruce
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.

Authors:  Zhou Wang; Alan Conrad Bovik; Hamid Rahim Sheikh; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.856

4.  The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A low-power asynchronous interleaved sampling algorithm for cochlear implants that encodes envelope and phase information.

Authors:  Ji-Jon Sit; Andrea M Simonson; Andrew J Oxenham; Michael A Faltys; Rahul Sarpeshkar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Effects of acoustic trauma on the representation of the vowel "eh" in cat auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  R L Miller; J R Schilling; K R Franck; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Encoding of steady-state vowels in the auditory nerve: representation in terms of discharge rate.

Authors:  M B Sachs; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Phoneme representation and classification in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Nima Mesgarani; Stephen V David; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  1 in total

1.  Noise-Sensitive But More Precise Subcortical Representations Coexist with Robust Cortical Encoding of Natural Vocalizations.

Authors:  Samira Souffi; Christian Lorenzi; Léo Varnet; Chloé Huetz; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.