Literature DB >> 31418717

Does Asymmetric Hearing Loss Affect the Ability to Understand in Noisy Environments?

Rafael Barona1, Juan Antonio Vizcaino1, Claudio Krstulovic1, Luz Barona1, Carmen Comeche1, Jose Montalt1, Mercedes Ubeda1, Carolina Polo2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine whether, in asymmetric hearing loss, the presence of an ear with a better or worse hearing threshold is related to either better or worse speech-in-noise (SiN) intelligibility.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 618 subjects with different degrees of hearing loss were evaluated for their ability to understand SiN. A stepwise forward logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors that affect performance. The influencing factors of very high or very low performance were determined.
RESULTS: Age, especially after 70 years of age, and hearing loss, especially from moderate hearing loss, negatively influence SiN intelligibility. Remarkably high intelligibility was identified in subjects with a contralateral ear presenting a better auditory threshold.
CONCLUSION: Although age and hearing loss are known factors that affect SiN intelligibility, the presence of a healthy contralateral ear is presented as the first description of preservation of SiN hearing ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31418717      PMCID: PMC6750784          DOI: 10.5152/iao.2019.5765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Adv Otol        ISSN: 1308-7649            Impact factor:   1.017


  30 in total

Review 1.  Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant.

Authors:  P Schleich; P Nopp; P D'Haese
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.

Authors:  Sabine Hochmuth; Thomas Brand; Melanie A Zokoll; Franz Zenker Castro; Nina Wardenga; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Temporal processing deficits in the pre-senescent auditory system.

Authors:  John H Grose; Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory processing tests for Spanish-speaking adults: an initial study.

Authors:  Adrian Fuente; Bradley McPherson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-20

7.  Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.

Authors:  Mary Rudner; Catharina Foo; Jerker Rönnberg; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10

8.  Effects of different noises on speech discrimination by the elderly.

Authors:  S Prosser; M Turrini; E Arslan
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1990

Review 9.  Cognitive aging and auditory information processing.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 10.  Anatomy and physiology of binaural hearing.

Authors:  D R Moore
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1991
View more
  1 in total

1.  Molecular diagnose of a large hearing loss population from China by targeted genome sequencing.

Authors:  Jie Wu; Zongfu Cao; Yu Su; Yang Wang; Ruikun Cai; Jiyue Chen; Bo Gao; Mingyu Han; Xiaohong Li; DeJun Zhang; Xue Gao; Shasha Huang; Quanfei Huang; Yongyi Yuan; Xu Ma; Pu Dai
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.755

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.