Literature DB >> 27556521

The Acoustics of Word-Initial Fricatives and Their Effect on Word-Level Intelligibility in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Patrick F Reidy1, Kayla Kristensen, Matthew B Winn, Ruth Y Litovsky, Jan R Edwards.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Previous research has found that relative to their peers with normal hearing (NH), children with cochlear implants (CIs) produce the sibilant fricatives /s/ and /∫/ less accurately and with less subphonemic acoustic contrast. The present study sought to further investigate these differences across groups in two ways. First, subphonemic acoustic properties were investigated in terms of dynamic acoustic features that indexed more than just the contrast between /s/ and /∫/. Second, the authors investigated whether such differences in subphonemic acoustic contrast between sibilant fricatives affected the intelligibility of sibilant-initial single word productions by children with CIs and their peers with NH.
DESIGN: In experiment 1, productions of /s/ and /∫/ in word-initial prevocalic contexts were elicited from 22 children with bilateral CIs (aged 4 to 7 years) who had at least 2 years of CI experience and from 22 chronological age-matched peers with NH. Acoustic features were measured from 17 points across the fricatives: peak frequency was measured to index the place of articulation contrast; spectral variance and amplitude drop were measured to index the degree of sibilance. These acoustic trajectories were fitted with growth-curve models to analyze time-varying spectral change. In experiment 2, phonemically accurate word productions that were elicited in experiment 1 were embedded within four-talker babble and played to 80 adult listeners with NH. Listeners were asked to repeat the words, and their accuracy rate was used as a measure of the intelligibility of the word productions. Regression analyses were run to test which acoustic properties measured in experiment 1 predicted the intelligibility scores from experiment 2.
RESULTS: The peak frequency trajectories indicated that the children with CIs produced less acoustic contrast between /s/ and /∫/. Group differences were observed in terms of the dynamic aspects (i.e., the trajectory shapes) of the acoustic properties. In the productions by children with CIs, the peak frequency and the amplitude drop trajectories were shallower, and the spectral variance trajectories were more asymmetric, exhibiting greater increases in variance (i.e., reduced sibilance) near the fricative-vowel boundary. The listeners' responses to the word productions indicated that when produced by children with CIs, /∫/-initial words were significantly more intelligible than /s/-initial words. However, when produced by children with NH, /s/-initial words and /∫/-initial words were equally intelligible. Intelligibility was partially predicted from the acoustic properties (Cox & Snell pseudo-R > 0.190), and the significant predictors were predominantly dynamic, rather than static, ones.
CONCLUSIONS: Productions from children with CIs differed from those produced by age-matched NH controls in terms of their subphonemic acoustic properties. The intelligibility of sibilant-initial single-word productions by children with CIs is sensitive to the place of articulation of the initial consonant (/∫/-initial words were more intelligible than /s/-initial words), but productions by children with NH were equally intelligible across both places of articulation. Therefore, children with CIs still exhibit differential production abilities for sibilant fricatives at an age when their NH peers do not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27556521      PMCID: PMC5161607          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  62 in total

1.  Time-varying spectral change in the vowels of children and adults.

Authors:  P F Assmann; W F Katz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech production accuracy and variability in young cochlear implant recipients: comparisons with typically developing age-peers.

Authors:  David J Ertmer; Lisa Goffman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids.

Authors:  M J Osberger; M Maso; L K Sam
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1993-02

4.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech intelligibility, speaking rate, and vowel formant characteristics in Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implant.

Authors:  Hsiu-Feng Chuang; Cheng-Chieh Yang; Lin-Yang Chi; Gary Weismer; Yu-Tsai Wang
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 2.484

6.  The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech-production growth: is there an added value for early implantation?

Authors:  Carol McDonald Connor; Holly K Craig; Stephen W Raudenbush; Krista Heavner; Teresa A Zwolan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children.

Authors:  J Bench; A Kowal; J Bamford
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-08

8.  Phonological awareness and literacy development in children with expressive phonological impairments.

Authors:  J Bird; D V Bishop; N H Freeman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-04

9.  Variability in /s/ production in children and adults: evidence from dynamic measures of spectral mean.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Contrast and covert contrast: The phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers.

Authors:  Fangfang Li; Jan Edwards; Mary E Beckman
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2009
View more
  7 in total

1.  Bias in the perception of phonetic detail in children's speech: A comparison of categorical and continuous rating scales.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Sarah K Schellinger; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Perception-Production Links in Children's Speech.

Authors:  Joanna H Lowenstein; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Computing low-dimensional representations of speech from socio-auditory structures for phonetic analyses.

Authors:  Andrew R Plummer; Patrick F Reidy
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2018-10-24

4.  Effects of Device Limitations on Acquisition of the /t/-/k/ Contrast in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Allison A Johnson; Danielle M Bentley; Benjamin Munson; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Auditory feedback experience in the development of phonetic production: Evidence from preschoolers with cochlear implants and their normal-hearing peers.

Authors:  Margaret Cychosz; Benjamin Munson; Rochelle S Newman; Jan R Edwards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

6.  Spectral and temporal measures of coarticulation in child speech.

Authors:  Margaret Cychosz; Jan R Edwards; Benjamin Munson; Keith Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Does Early Phonetic Differentiation Predict Later Phonetic Development? Evidence From a Longitudinal Study of /ɹ/ Development in Preschool Children.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Mara K Logerquist; Hyuna Kim; Alisha Martell; Jan Edwards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.297

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.