Literature DB >> 26176923

Parent-progeny sequencing indicates higher mutation rates in heterozygotes.

Sihai Yang1, Long Wang1, Ju Huang1, Xiaohui Zhang1, Yang Yuan1, Jian-Qun Chen1, Laurence D Hurst2, Dacheng Tian1.   

Abstract

Mutation rates vary within genomes, but the causes of this remain unclear. As many prior inferences rely on methods that assume an absence of selection, potentially leading to artefactual results, we call mutation events directly using a parent-offspring sequencing strategy focusing on Arabidopsis and using rice and honey bee for replication. Here we show that mutation rates are higher in heterozygotes and in proximity to crossover events. A correlation between recombination rate and intraspecific diversity is in part owing to a higher mutation rate in domains of high recombination/diversity. Implicating diversity per se as a cause, we find an ∼3.5-fold higher mutation rate in heterozygotes than in homozygotes, with mutations occurring in closer proximity to heterozygous sites than expected by chance. In a genome that is a patchwork of heterozygous and homozygous domains, mutations occur disproportionately more often in the heterozygous domains. If segregating mutations predispose to a higher local mutation rate, clusters of genes dominantly under purifying selection (more commonly homozygous) and under balancing selection (more commonly heterozygous), might have low and high mutation rates, respectively. Our results are consistent with this, there being a ten times higher mutation rate in pathogen resistance genes, expected to be under positive or balancing selection. Consequently, we do not necessarily need to evoke extremely weak selection on the mutation rate to explain why mutational hot and cold spots might correspond to regions under positive/balancing and purifying selection, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26176923     DOI: 10.1038/nature14649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  41 in total

1.  A note on calculation of empirical P values from Monte Carlo procedure.

Authors:  B V North; D Curtis; P C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Variation in the mutation rate across mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Alan Hodgkinson; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Coevolution with viruses drives the evolution of bacterial mutation rates.

Authors:  Csaba Pal; María D Maciá; Antonio Oliver; Ira Schachar; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Drift-barrier hypothesis and mutation-rate evolution.

Authors:  Way Sung; Matthew S Ackerman; Samuel F Miller; Thomas G Doak; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Mutations arising during repair of chromosome breaks.

Authors:  Anna Malkova; James E Haber
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 16.830

6.  MDC1 directs chromosome-wide silencing of the sex chromosomes in male germ cells.

Authors:  Yosuke Ichijima; Misako Ichijima; Zhenkun Lou; André Nussenzweig; R Daniel Camerini-Otero; Junjie Chen; Paul R Andreassen; Satoshi H Namekawa
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  No gene-specific optimization of mutation rate in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Xiaoshu Chen; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 8.  Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Indel-associated mutation rate varies with mating system in flowering plants.

Authors:  Jesse D Hollister; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Brandon S Gaut
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Comparison of insertion/deletion calling algorithms on human next-generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Dalia H Ghoneim; Jason R Myers; Emily Tuttle; Alex R Paciorkowski
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-12-01
View more
  68 in total

1.  Inter-allelic interactions play a major role in microsatellite evolution.

Authors:  William Amos; Danica Kosanović; Anders Eriksson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Heterozygosity increases microsatellite mutation rate.

Authors:  William Amos
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Genomic incompatibilities in the diploid and tetraploid offspring of the goldfish × common carp cross.

Authors:  Shaojun Liu; Jing Luo; Jing Chai; Li Ren; Yi Zhou; Feng Huang; Xiaochuan Liu; Yubao Chen; Chun Zhang; Min Tao; Bin Lu; Wei Zhou; Guoliang Lin; Chao Mai; Shuo Yuan; Jun Wang; Tao Li; Qinbo Qin; Hao Feng; Kaikun Luo; Jun Xiao; Huan Zhong; Rurong Zhao; Wei Duan; Zhenyan Song; Yanqin Wang; Jing Wang; Li Zhong; Lu Wang; Zhaoli Ding; Zhenglin Du; Xuemei Lu; Yun Gao; Robert W Murphy; Yun Liu; Axel Meyer; Ya-Ping Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cloning of novel rice blast resistance genes from two rapidly evolving NBS-LRR gene families in rice.

Authors:  Changjiang Guo; Xiaoguang Sun; Xiao Chen; Sihai Yang; Jing Li; Long Wang; Xiaohui Zhang
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  Genetics: Feedforward loop for diversity.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Mutational Landscape of Spontaneous Base Substitutions and Small Indels in Experimental Caenorhabditis elegans Populations of Differing Size.

Authors:  Anke Konrad; Meghan J Brady; Ulfar Bergthorsson; Vaishali Katju
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Evolution of the Mutational Process under Relaxed Selection in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Ayush Shekhar Saxena; Matthew P Salomon; Chikako Matsuba; Shu-Dan Yeh; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  An accurate and efficient method for large-scale SSR genotyping and applications.

Authors:  Lun Li; Zhiwei Fang; Junfei Zhou; Hong Chen; Zhangfeng Hu; Lifen Gao; Lihong Chen; Sheng Ren; Hongyu Ma; Long Lu; Weixiong Zhang; Hai Peng
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Spontaneous Chloroplast Mutants Mostly Occur by Replication Slippage and Show a Biased Pattern in the Plastome of Oenothera.

Authors:  Amid Massouh; Julia Schubert; Liliya Yaneva-Roder; Elena S Ulbricht-Jones; Arkadiusz Zupok; Marc T J Johnson; Stephen I Wright; Tommaso Pellizzer; Johanna Sobanski; Ralph Bock; Stephan Greiner
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 10.  Determinants of genetic diversity.

Authors:  Hans Ellegren; Nicolas Galtier
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.