Literature DB >> 31110155

Mutational Landscape of Spontaneous Base Substitutions and Small Indels in Experimental Caenorhabditis elegans Populations of Differing Size.

Anke Konrad1, Meghan J Brady1, Ulfar Bergthorsson1, Vaishali Katju2.   

Abstract

Experimental investigations into the rates and fitness effects of spontaneous mutations are fundamental to our understanding of the evolutionary process. To gain insights into the molecular and fitness consequences of spontaneous mutations, we conducted a mutation accumulation (MA) experiment at varying population sizes in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, evolving 35 lines in parallel for 409 generations at three population sizes (N = 1, 10, and 100 individuals). Here, we focus on nuclear SNPs and small insertion/deletions (indels) under minimal influence of selection, as well as their accrual rates in larger populations under greater selection efficacy. The spontaneous rates of base substitutions and small indels are 1.84 (95% C.I. ± 0.14) × 10-9 substitutions and 6.84 (95% C.I. ± 0.97) × 10-10 changes/site/generation, respectively. Small indels exhibit a deletion bias with deletions exceeding insertions by threefold. Notably, there was no correlation between the frequency of base substitutions, nonsynonymous substitutions, or small indels with population size. These results contrast with our previous analysis of mitochondrial DNA mutations and nuclear copy-number changes in these MA lines, and suggest that nuclear base substitutions and small indels are under less stringent purifying selection compared to the former mutational classes. A transition bias was observed in exons as was a near universal base substitution bias toward A/T. Strongly context-dependent base substitutions, where 5'-Ts and 3'-As increase the frequency of A/T → T/A transversions, especially at the boundaries of A or T homopolymeric runs, manifest as higher mutation rates in (i) introns and intergenic regions relative to exons, (ii) chromosomal cores vs. arms and tips, and (iii) germline-expressed genes.
Copyright © 2019 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caenorhabditis elegans; base substitution; genetic drift; mutation accumulation line; selection; small indel

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31110155      PMCID: PMC6614903          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.302054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  66 in total

1.  Estimating numbers of EMS-induced mutations affecting life history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans in crosses between inbred sublines.

Authors:  Daniel L Halligan; Andrew D Peters; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Natural selection shapes nucleotide polymorphism across the genome of the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Jae Young Choi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  High levels of transcription stimulate transversions at GC base pairs in yeast.

Authors:  Matthew P Alexander; Kaitlyn J Begins; William C Crall; Margaret P Holmes; Malcolm J Lippert
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  Evidence suggesting a non-random character to nucleotide replacements in naturally occurring mutations.

Authors:  W M Fitch
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1967-06-28       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

6.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools.

Authors:  Heng Li; Bob Handsaker; Alec Wysoker; Tim Fennell; Jue Ruan; Nils Homer; Gabor Marth; Goncalo Abecasis; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  High mutational rates of large-scale duplication and deletion in Daphnia pulex.

Authors:  Nathan Keith; Abraham E Tucker; Craig E Jackson; Way Sung; José Ignacio Lucas Lledó; Daniel R Schrider; Sarah Schaack; Jeffry L Dudycha; Matthew Ackerman; Andrew J Younge; Joseph R Shaw; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Deep sequencing of natural and experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster reveals biases in the spectrum of new mutations.

Authors:  Zoe June Assaf; Susanne Tilk; Jane Park; Mark L Siegal; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Spontaneous Mutation Rate in the Smallest Photosynthetic Eukaryotes.

Authors:  Marc Krasovec; Adam Eyre-Walker; Sophie Sanchez-Ferandin; Gwenael Piganeau
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  DNA repair, recombination, and damage signaling.

Authors:  Anton Gartner; JoAnne Engebrecht
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  An Intron of Invertebrate Microphthalmia Transcription Factor Gene Is Evolved from a Longer Ancestral Sequence.

Authors:  Jun-Ming Mao; Yong Wang; Liu Yang; Qin Yao; Ke-Ping Chen
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 1.625

3.  Mutability of mononucleotide repeats, not oxidative stress, explains the discrepancy between laboratory-accumulated mutations and the natural allele-frequency spectrum in C. elegans.

Authors:  Moein Rajaei; Ayush Shekhar Saxena; Lindsay M Johnson; Michael C Snyder; Timothy A Crombie; Robyn E Tanny; Erik C Andersen; Joanna Joyner-Matos; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Intraspecific Variation in the Rates of Mutations Causing Structural Variation in Daphnia magna.

Authors:  Eddie K H Ho; Sarah Schaack
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 5.  Stability across the Whole Nuclear Genome in the Presence and Absence of DNA Mismatch Repair.

Authors:  Scott Alexander Lujan; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  A broad mutational target explains a fast rate of phenotypic evolution.

Authors:  Fabrice Besnard; Joao Picao-Osorio; Clément Dubois; Marie-Anne Félix
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 8.140

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.