Literature DB >> 23478346

Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species.

Asher D Cutter1, Bret A Payseur.   

Abstract

Population genetics theory supplies powerful predictions about how natural selection interacts with genetic linkage to sculpt the genomic landscape of nucleotide polymorphism. Both the spread of beneficial mutations and the removal of deleterious mutations act to depress polymorphism levels, especially in low-recombination regions. However, empiricists have documented extreme disparities among species. Here we characterize the dominant features that could drive differences in linked selection among species--including roles for selective sweeps being 'hard' or 'soft'--and the concealing effects of demography and confounding genomic variables. We advocate targeted studies of closely related species to unify our understanding of how selection and linkage interact to shape genome evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23478346      PMCID: PMC4066956          DOI: 10.1038/nrg3425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Genet        ISSN: 1471-0056            Impact factor:   53.242


  170 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans.

Authors:  Laurent Duret
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION.

Authors:  M KIMURA; J F CROW
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Directional positive selection on an allele of arbitrary dominance.

Authors:  Kosuke M Teshima; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A weak effect of background selection on trinucleotide microsatellites in maize.

Authors:  Anne-Céline Thuillet; Maud I Tenaillon; Lorinda K Anderson; Sharon E Mitchell; Stephen Kresovich; Stephen M Stack; Brandon Gaut; John Doebley
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 2.645

5.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Hill-Robertson interference is a minor determinant of variations in codon bias across Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans genomes.

Authors:  Gabriel Marais; Gwenaël Piganeau
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Evidence for hitchhiking of deleterious mutations within the human genome.

Authors:  Sung Chun; Justin C Fay
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation.

Authors:  Jonathan K Pritchard; Joseph K Pickrell; Graham Coop
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  187 in total

1.  The Effects of Background and Interference Selection on Patterns of Genetic Variation in Subdivided Populations.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Pádraic Corcoran
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Impact of Recombination Hotspots on Genome Evolution of a Fungal Plant Pathogen.

Authors:  Daniel Croll; Mark H Lendenmann; Ethan Stewart; Bruce A McDonald
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Does population size affect genetic diversity? A test with sympatric lizard species.

Authors:  M T J Hague; E J Routman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Crossover heterogeneity in the absence of hotspots in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Taniya Kaur; Matthew V Rockman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Juxtaposition of heterozygous and homozygous regions causes reciprocal crossover remodelling via interference during Arabidopsis meiosis.

Authors:  Piotr A Ziolkowski; Luke E Berchowitz; Christophe Lambing; Nataliya E Yelina; Xiaohui Zhao; Krystyna A Kelly; Kyuha Choi; Liliana Ziolkowska; Viviana June; Eugenio Sanchez-Moran; Chris Franklin; Gregory P Copenhaver; Ian R Henderson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Stochastic dynamics of adaptive trait and neutral marker driven by eco-evolutionary feedbacks.

Authors:  Sylvain Billiard; Régis Ferrière; Sylvie Méléard; Viet Chi Tran
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Parent-progeny sequencing indicates higher mutation rates in heterozygotes.

Authors:  Sihai Yang; Long Wang; Ju Huang; Xiaohui Zhang; Yang Yuan; Jian-Qun Chen; Laurence D Hurst; Dacheng Tian
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Soft shoulders ahead: spurious signatures of soft and partial selective sweeps result from linked hard sweeps.

Authors:  Daniel R Schrider; Fábio K Mendes; Matthew W Hahn; Andrew D Kern
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Selection, Linkage, and Population Structure Interact To Shape Genetic Variation Among Threespine Stickleback Genomes.

Authors:  Thomas C Nelson; Johnathan G Crandall; Catherine M Ituarte; Julian M Catchen; William A Cresko
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Evidence that the rate of strong selective sweeps increases with population size in the great apes.

Authors:  Kiwoong Nam; Kasper Munch; Thomas Mailund; Alexander Nater; Maja Patricia Greminger; Michael Krützen; Tomàs Marquès-Bonet; Mikkel Heide Schierup
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.