Literature DB >> 30445510

Evolution of the Mutational Process under Relaxed Selection in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Ayush Shekhar Saxena1, Matthew P Salomon1,2, Chikako Matsuba1,2, Shu-Dan Yeh1,3, Charles F Baer1,4.   

Abstract

The mutational process varies at many levels, from within genomes to among taxa. Many mechanisms have been linked to variation in mutation, but understanding of the evolution of the mutational process is rudimentary. Physiological condition is often implicated as a source of variation in microbial mutation rate and may contribute to mutation rate variation in multicellular organisms.Deleterious mutations are an ubiquitous source of variation in condition. We test the hypothesis that the mutational process depends on the underlying mutation load in two groups of Caenorhabditis elegans mutation accumulation (MA) lines that differ in their starting mutation loads. "First-order MA" (O1MA) lines maintained under minimal selection for ∼250 generations were divided into high-fitness and low-fitness groups and sets of "second-order MA" (O2MA) lines derived from each O1MA line were maintained for ∼150 additional generations. Genomes of 48 O2MA lines and their progenitors were sequenced. There is significant variation among O2MA lines in base-substitution rate (µbs), but no effect of initial fitness; the indel rate is greater in high-fitness O2MA lines. Overall, µbs is positively correlated with recombination and proximity to short tandem repeats and negatively correlated with 10 bp and 1 kb GC content. However, probability of mutation is sufficiently predicted by the three-nucleotide motif alone. Approximately 90% of the variance in standing nucleotide variation is explained by mutability. Total mutation rate increased in the O2MA lines, as predicted by the "drift barrier" model of mutation rate evolution. These data, combined with experimental estimates of fitness, suggest that epistasis is synergistic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30445510      PMCID: PMC6367967          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msy213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  48 in total

1.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Evidence for elevated mutation rates in low-quality genotypes.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Sharp; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3.

Authors:  Pablo Cingolani; Adrian Platts; Le Lily Wang; Melissa Coon; Tung Nguyen; Luan Wang; Susan J Land; Xiangyi Lu; Douglas M Ruden
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.160

4.  The cellular, developmental and population-genetic determinants of mutation-rate evolution.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Parent-progeny sequencing indicates higher mutation rates in heterozygotes.

Authors:  Sihai Yang; Long Wang; Ju Huang; Xiaohui Zhang; Yang Yuan; Jian-Qun Chen; Laurence D Hurst; Dacheng Tian
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Accelerating Mutational Load Is Not Due to Synergistic Epistasis or Mutator Alleles in Mutation Accumulation Lines of Yeast.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Jasmin; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Rates and genomic consequences of spontaneous mutational events in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Daniel R Schrider; David Houle; Michael Lynch; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The million mutation project: a new approach to genetics in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Owen Thompson; Mark Edgley; Pnina Strasbourger; Stephane Flibotte; Brent Ewing; Ryan Adair; Vinci Au; Iasha Chaudhry; Lisa Fernando; Harald Hutter; Armelle Kieffer; Joanne Lau; Norris Lee; Angela Miller; Greta Raymant; Bin Shen; Jay Shendure; Jon Taylor; Emily H Turner; LaDeana W Hillier; Donald G Moerman; Robert H Waterston
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Extensive de novo mutation rate variation between individuals and across the genome of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  Rob W Ness; Andrew D Morgan; Radhakrishnan B Vasanthakrishnan; Nick Colegrave; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Direct Determination of the Mutation Rate in the Bumblebee Reveals Evidence for Weak Recombination-Associated Mutation and an Approximate Rate Constancy in Insects.

Authors:  Haoxuan Liu; Yanxiao Jia; Xiaoguang Sun; Dacheng Tian; Laurence D Hurst; Sihai Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Mutational Landscape of Spontaneous Base Substitutions and Small Indels in Experimental Caenorhabditis elegans Populations of Differing Size.

Authors:  Anke Konrad; Meghan J Brady; Ulfar Bergthorsson; Vaishali Katju
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Males, Outcrossing, and Sexual Selection in Caenorhabditis Nematodes.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Levi T Morran; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Short-term heritable variation overwhelms 200 generations of mutational variance for metabolic traits in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Lindsay M Johnson; Olivia J Smith; Daniel A Hahn; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Evolution of Yin and Yang isoforms of a chromatin remodeling subunit precedes the creation of two genes.

Authors:  Wen Xu; Lijiang Long; Yuehui Zhao; Lewis Stevens; Irene Felipe; Javier Munoz; Ronald E Ellis; Patrick T McGrath
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Flanking heterozygosity influences the relative probability of different base substitutions in humans.

Authors:  William Amos
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Stepwise accumulation of mutations in CesA3 in Phytophthora sojae results in increasing resistance to CAA fungicides.

Authors:  Meng Cai; Can Zhang; Weizhen Wang; Qin Peng; Xi Song; Brett M Tyler; Xili Liu
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  The rate and molecular spectrum of mutation are selectively maintained in yeast.

Authors:  Haoxuan Liu; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Low Base-Substitution Mutation Rate but High Rate of Slippage Mutations in the Sequence Repeat-Rich Genome of Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  Sibel Kucukyildirim; Megan Behringer; Way Sung; Debra A Brock; Thomas G Doak; Hatice Mergen; David C Queller; Joan E Strassmann; Michael Lynch
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Estimation of the SNP Mutation Rate in Two Vegetatively Propagating Species of Duckweed.

Authors:  George Sandler; Magdalena Bartkowska; Aneil F Agrawal; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  A broad mutational target explains a fast rate of phenotypic evolution.

Authors:  Fabrice Besnard; Joao Picao-Osorio; Clément Dubois; Marie-Anne Félix
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.