Literature DB >> 23146099

Mutations arising during repair of chromosome breaks.

Anna Malkova1, James E Haber.   

Abstract

Mutations stimulate evolutionary change and lead to birth defects and cancer in humans as well as to antibiotic resistance in bacteria. According to the classic view, most mutations arise in dividing cells and result from uncorrected errors of S-phase DNA replication, which is highly accurate because of the involvement of selective DNA polymerases and efficient error-correcting mechanisms. In contrast, studies in bacteria and yeast reveal that DNA synthesis associated with repair of double-strand chromosomal breaks (DSBs) by homologous recombination is highly inaccurate, thus making DSBs and their repair an important source of mutations. Different error-prone mechanisms appear to operate in different repair scenarios. In the filling in of single-stranded DNA regions, error-prone translesion DNA polymerases appear to produce most errors. In contrast, in gene conversion gap repair and in break-induced replication, errors are independent of translesion polymerases, and many mutations have the signatures of template switching during DNA repair synthesis. DNA repair also appears to create complex copy-number variants. Overall, homologous recombination, which is traditionally considered a safe pathway of DSB repair, is an important source of mutagenesis that may contribute to human disease and evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23146099     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Genet        ISSN: 0066-4197            Impact factor:   16.830


  79 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of recombination and genomic maintenance.

Authors:  Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  DNA REPAIR. Mus81 and converging forks limit the mutagenicity of replication fork breakage.

Authors:  Ryan Mayle; Ian M Campbell; Christine R Beck; Yang Yu; Marenda Wilson; Chad A Shaw; Lotte Bjergbaek; James R Lupski; Grzegorz Ira
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  DNA polymerases are error-prone at RecA-mediated recombination intermediates.

Authors:  Richard T Pomerantz; Myron F Goodman; Michael E O'Donnell
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Genome plasticity in Candida albicans is driven by long repeat sequences.

Authors:  Robert T Todd; Tyler D Wikoff; Anja Forche; Anna Selmecki
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Mechanisms and Consequences of Double-Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin.

Authors:  Wendy J Cannan; David S Pederson
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.384

6.  Parent-progeny sequencing indicates higher mutation rates in heterozygotes.

Authors:  Sihai Yang; Long Wang; Ju Huang; Xiaohui Zhang; Yang Yuan; Jian-Qun Chen; Laurence D Hurst; Dacheng Tian
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Translesion DNA polymerases in eukaryotes: what makes them tick?

Authors:  Alexandra Vaisman; Roger Woodgate
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 8.250

8.  Cdc24 Is Essential for Long-range End Resection in the Repair of Double-stranded DNA Breaks.

Authors:  Huimin Zhang; Yu Hua; Rui Li; Daochun Kong
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Hypermutation in human cancer genomes: footprints and mechanisms.

Authors:  Steven A Roberts; Dmitry A Gordenin
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 10.  Break induced replication in eukaryotes: mechanisms, functions, and consequences.

Authors:  Cynthia J Sakofsky; Anna Malkova
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 8.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.