Literature DB >> 26160982

Effects of Detector Thickness on Geometric Sensitivity and Event Positioning Errors in the Rectangular PET/X Scanner.

Lawrence R MacDonald1, William C J Hunter1, Paul E Kinahan1, Robert S Miyaoka1.   

Abstract

We used simulations to investigate the relationship between sensitivity and spatial resolution as a function of crystal thickness in a rectangular PET scanner intended for quantitative assessment of breast cancers. The system had two 20 × 15-cm2 and two 10 × 15-cm2 flat detectors forming a box, with the larger detectors separated by 4 or 8 cm. Depth-of-interaction (DOI) resolution was modeled as a function of crystal thickness based on prior measurements. Spatial resolution was evaluated independent of image reconstruction by deriving and validating a surrogate metric from list-mode data (dFWHM). When increasing crystal thickness from 5 to 40 mm, and without using DOI information, the dFWHM for a centered point source increased from 0.72 to 1.6 mm. Including DOI information improved dFWHM by 12% and 27% for 5- and 40-mm-thick crystals, respectively. For a point source in the corner of the FOV, use of DOI information improved dFWHM by 20% (5-mm crystal) and 44% (40-mm crystal). Sensitivity was 7.7% for 10-mm-thick crystals (8-cm object). Increasing crystal thickness on the smaller side detectors from 10 to 20 mm (keeping 10-mm crystals on the larger detectors) boosted sensitivity by 24% (relative) and degraded dFWHM by only ~3%/8% with/without DOI information. The benefits of measuring DOI must be evaluated in terms of the intended clinical task of assessing tracer uptake in small lesions. Increasing crystal thickness on the smaller side detectors provides substantial sensitivity increase with minimal accompanying loss in resolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer simulation; dedicated breast PET; positron emission tomography

Year:  2013        PMID: 26160982      PMCID: PMC4494122          DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2013.2278841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci        ISSN: 0018-9499            Impact factor:   1.679


  16 in total

1.  Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Hannah M Linden; Svetlana A Stekhova; Jeanne M Link; Julie R Gralow; Robert B Livingston; Georgiana K Ellis; Philip H Petra; Lanell M Peterson; Erin K Schubert; Lisa K Dunnwald; Kenneth A Krohn; David A Mankoff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Advancements to the planogram frequency-distance rebinning algorithm.

Authors:  Kyle M Champley; Raymond R Raylman; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Inverse Probl       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.407

3.  Feasibility study for positron emission mammography.

Authors:  C J Thompson; K Murthy; I N Weinberg; F Mako
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Clinical performance of 2 dedicated PET scanners for breast imaging: initial evaluation.

Authors:  Mami Iima; Yuji Nakamoto; Shotaro Kanao; Tomoharu Sugie; Takayuki Ueno; Mayumi Kawada; Yoshiki Mikami; Masakazu Toi; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Design study of a high-resolution breast-dedicated PET system built from cadmium zinc telluride detectors.

Authors:  Hao Peng; Craig S Levin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Positron emission mammography: correlation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and 18F-FDG.

Authors:  Carolyn L Wang; Lawrence R MacDonald; James V Rogers; Aleksandr Aravkin; David R Haseley; J David Beatty
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations.

Authors:  N Avril; C A Rosé; M Schelling; J Dose; W Kuhn; S Bense; W Weber; S Ziegler; H Graeff; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  PET-based estradiol challenge as a predictive biomarker of response to endocrine therapy in women with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Farrokh Dehdashti; Joanne E Mortimer; Kathryn Trinkaus; Michael J Naughton; Matthew Ellis; John A Katzenellenbogen; Michael J Welch; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-03-09       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Imaging early changes in proliferation at 1 week post chemotherapy: a pilot study in breast cancer patients with 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Laura Kenny; R Charles Coombes; David M Vigushin; Adil Al-Nahhas; Sami Shousha; Eric O Aboagye
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  5 in total

1.  Impact of Using Uniform Attenuation Coefficients for Heterogeneously Dense Breasts in a Dedicated Breast PET/X-ray Scanner.

Authors:  Lawrence R MacDonald; Joseph Y Lo; Gregory M Sturgeon; Chengeng Zeng; Robert L Harrison; Paul E Kinahan; William Paul Segars
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-29

2.  Simulation study of quantitative precision of the PET/X dedicated breast PET scanner.

Authors:  Chengeng Zeng; Paul E Kinahan; Hua Qian; Robert L Harrison; Kyle M Champley; Lawrence R MacDonald
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-10-30

3.  Performance Characteristics of a Dual-Sided Position-Sensitive Sparse-Sensor Detector for Gamma-ray Imaging.

Authors:  William C J Hunter; Donald Q DeWitt; Robert S Miyaoka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-07

4.  A dedicated breast-PET/CT scanner: Evaluation of basic performance characteristics.

Authors:  Raymond R Raylman; Will Van Kampen; Alexander V Stolin; Wenbo Gong; Gangadhar Jaliparthi; Peter F Martone; Mark F Smith; David Sarment; Neal H Clinthorne; Mark Perna
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Dedicated Breast Gamma Camera Imaging and Breast PET: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Deepa Narayanan; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.