PURPOSE: 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography ([18F]FLT-PET) has been developed for imaging cell proliferation and findings correlate strongly with the Ki-67 labelling index in breast cancer. The aims of this pilot study were to define objective criteria for [18F]FLT response and to examine whether [18F]FLT-PET can be used to quantify early response of breast cancer to chemotherapy. METHODS: Seventeen discrete lesions in 13 patients with stage II-IV breast cancer were scanned prior to and at 1 week after treatment with combination 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapy. The uptake at 90 min (SUV90) and irreversible trapping (Ki) of [18F]FLT were calculated for each tumour. The reproducibility of [18F]FLT-PET was determined in nine discrete lesions from eight patients who were scanned twice before chemotherapy. Clinical response was assessed at 60 days after commencing FEC. RESULTS: All tumours showed [18F]FLT uptake and this was reproducible in serial measurements (SD of mean % difference=10.5% and 15.1%, for SUV90 and Ki, respectively; test-retest correlation coefficient>or=0.97). Six patients had a significant clinical response (complete or partial) at day 60; these patients also had a significant reduction in [18F]FLT uptake at 1 week. Decreases in Ki and SUV90 at 1 week discriminated between clinical response and stable disease (p=0.022 for both parameters). In three patients with multiple lesions there was a mixed [18F]FLT response in primary tumours and metastases. [18F]FLT response generally preceded tumour size changes. CONCLUSION: [18F]FLT-PET can detect changes in breast cancer proliferation at 1 week after FEC chemotherapy.
PURPOSE: 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography ([18F]FLT-PET) has been developed for imaging cell proliferation and findings correlate strongly with the Ki-67 labelling index in breast cancer. The aims of this pilot study were to define objective criteria for [18F]FLT response and to examine whether [18F]FLT-PET can be used to quantify early response of breast cancer to chemotherapy. METHODS: Seventeen discrete lesions in 13 patients with stage II-IV breast cancer were scanned prior to and at 1 week after treatment with combination 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapy. The uptake at 90 min (SUV90) and irreversible trapping (Ki) of [18F]FLT were calculated for each tumour. The reproducibility of [18F]FLT-PET was determined in nine discrete lesions from eight patients who were scanned twice before chemotherapy. Clinical response was assessed at 60 days after commencing FEC. RESULTS: All tumours showed [18F]FLT uptake and this was reproducible in serial measurements (SD of mean % difference=10.5% and 15.1%, for SUV90 and Ki, respectively; test-retest correlation coefficient>or=0.97). Six patients had a significant clinical response (complete or partial) at day 60; these patients also had a significant reduction in [18F]FLT uptake at 1 week. Decreases in Ki and SUV90 at 1 week discriminated between clinical response and stable disease (p=0.022 for both parameters). In three patients with multiple lesions there was a mixed [18F]FLT response in primary tumours and metastases. [18F]FLT response generally preceded tumour size changes. CONCLUSION: [18F]FLT-PET can detect changes in breast cancer proliferation at 1 week after FEC chemotherapy.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Betty S Pio; Cecilia K Park; Richard Pietras; Wei-Ann Hsueh; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Mark D Pegram; Johannes Czernin; Michael E Phelps; Daniel H S Silverman Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: M Dowsett; C Archer; L Assersohn; R K Gregory; P A Ellis; J Salter; J Chang; P Mainwaring; I Boeddinghaus; S R Johnston; T J Powles; I E Smith Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Paula Wells; Roger N Gunn; Colin Steel; Alex S Ranicar; Frank Brady; Safiye Osman; Terry Jones; Pat Price Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-06-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Karoline Spaepen; Sigrid Stroobants; Patrick Dupont; Guy Bormans; Jan Balzarini; Gregor Verhoef; Luc Mortelmans; Peter Vandenberghe; Christine De Wolf-Peeters Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2003-02-25 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Aren van Waarde; David C P Cobben; Albert J H Suurmeijer; Bram Maas; Willem Vaalburg; Erik F J de Vries; Pieter L Jager; Harald J Hoekstra; Philip H Elsinga Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Andreas K Buck; Gisela Halter; Holger Schirrmeister; Jörg Kotzerke; Imke Wurziger; Gerhard Glatting; Torsten Mattfeldt; Bernd Neumaier; Sven N Reske; Martin Hetzel Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ning Guo; Jingping Xie; H Charles Manning; Natasha G Deane; M Sib Ansari; Robert J Coffey; John Gore; Ronald R Price; Ronald M Baldwin; J Oliver McIntyre Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Farrokh Dehdashti; Perry W Grigsby; Robert J Myerson; Ilke Nalbantoglu; Changqing Ma; Barry A Siegel Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: K Pinker; P Brader; G Karanikas; K El-Rabadi; W Bogner; S Gruber; M Reisegger; S Trattnig; T H Helbich Journal: Radiologe Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 0.635
Authors: Lale Kostakoglu; Fenghai Duan; Michael O Idowu; Paul R Jolles; Harry D Bear; Mark Muzi; Jean Cormack; John P Muzi; Daniel A Pryma; Jennifer M Specht; Linda Hovanessian-Larsen; John Miliziano; Sharon Mallett; Anthony F Shields; David A Mankoff Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 10.057