Literature DB >> 28916957

Perspectives of Women Considering Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and their Peers towards a Telephone-Based Peer Support Intervention.

D St-Pierre1,2,3, K Bouchard2,3, L Gauthier2,3,4, J Chiquette2,3,4,5, Michel Dorval6,7,8,9,10.   

Abstract

Prophylactic mastectomy is an effective strategy to reduce the risk of breast cancer for women carrying a BRCA1/2 germline mutation. This decision is complex and may raise various concerns. Women considering this surgery have reported their desire to discuss the implications of this procedure with women who have undergone prophylactic mastectomy. We conducted a qualitative study to describe the topics covered during a telephone-based peer support intervention between women considering prophylactic mastectomy (recipients) and women who had undergone this surgery (peers), and to explore their perspectives regarding the intervention. Thirteen dyads were formed and data from participant logbooks and evaluation questionnaires were analyzed using a thematic content analysis. Three main dimensions emerged: physical, psychological, and social. The most frequent topics discussed were: surgery (92%), recovery (77%), pain and physical comfort (69%), impacts on intimacy and sexuality (54%), cancer-related anxiety (54%), experience related to loss of breasts (46%). Peers and recipients report that sharing experiences and thoughts about prophylactic mastectomy and the sense of mutual support within the dyad contributed significantly to their satisfaction. Special attention should be paid to the similarities between personal and medical profiles in order to create harmonious matches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1/2; Genetic counseling; Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome; Peer support; Prophylactic mastectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28916957     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0148-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  67 in total

1.  Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: results from a prospective study of mortality.

Authors:  Stephanie L Brown; Randolph M Nesse; Amiram D Vinokur; Dylan M Smith
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-07

2.  Health benefits of volunteering in the Wisconsin longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jane Allyn Piliavin; Erica Siegl
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2007-12

3.  What models of peer support do people with colorectal cancer prefer?

Authors:  S C Ieropoli; V M White; M Jefford; D Akkerman
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.520

4.  Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian, Version 2.2015.

Authors:  Mary B Daly; Robert Pilarski; Jennifer E Axilbund; Michael Berry; Saundra S Buys; Beth Crawford; Meagan Farmer; Susan Friedman; Judy E Garber; Seema Khan; Catherine Klein; Wendy Kohlmann; Allison Kurian; Jennifer K Litton; Lisa Madlensky; P Kelly Marcom; Sofia D Merajver; Kenneth Offit; Tuya Pal; Huma Rana; Gwen Reiser; Mark E Robson; Kristen Mahoney Shannon; Elizabeth Swisher; Nicoleta C Voian; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Alison Whelan; Myra J Wick; Georgia L Wiesner; Mary Dwyer; Rashmi Kumar; Susan Darlow
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Living with the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic mutation: learning how to adapt to a virtual chronic illness.

Authors:  A Samson; J DiMillo; A Thériault; S Lowry; L Corsini; S Verma; E Tomiak
Journal:  Psychol Health Med       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  What women wish they knew before prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Sharon J Rolnick; Andrea Altschuler; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Joann G Elmore; Sarah M Greene; Emily L Harris; Lisa J Herrinton; Mary B Barton; Ann M Geiger; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.592

8.  International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Henry Lynch; Pal Moller; Parviz Ghadirian; William D Foulkes; Jan Klijn; Eitan Friedman; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Peter Ainsworth; Barry Rosen; Susan Domchek; Teresa Wagner; Nadine Tung; Siranoush Manoukian; Fergus Couch; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 9.  One-to-one volunteer support programs for people with cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michelle L Macvean; Victoria M White; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-09-29

10.  Telephone peer support for women with gynaecological cancer: benefits and challenges for supporters.

Authors:  Nancy Pistrang; Zara Jay; Sue Gessler; Chris Barker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  3 in total

1.  The patient advisor, an organizational resource as a lever for an enhanced oncology patient experience (PAROLE-onco): a longitudinal multiple case study protocol.

Authors:  M P Pomey; M de Guise; M Desforges; K Bouchard; C Vialaron; L Normandin; M Iliescu-Nelea; I Fortin; I Ganache; C Régis; Z Rosberger; D Charpentier; L Bélanger; M Dorval; D P Ghadiri; M Lavoie-Tremblay; A Boivin; J F Pelletier; N Fernandez; A M Danino
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  What do women at high risk of breast cancer request of a patient education day? Focus interviews with women before and after deciding about prophylactic interventions.

Authors:  Anne Katrine Hartmann Søby; Christina Maar Andersen; Camilla Bille; Birgitta Fahnø Larsen; Lene Nyhøj Heidemann; Rachel Adelberg Johansen; Helle Timm; Kirsten Kaya Roessler
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 2.328

Review 3.  Psychosocial Interventions for Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Talin Boghosian; Jeanna M McCuaig; Lindsay Carlsson; Kelly A Metcalfe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.