Literature DB >> 15604640

Psychosocial factors associated with quality of life among individuals attending genetic counseling for hereditary cancer.

Anniken Hamang Carlsson1, Cathrine Bjorvatn, Lars Fredrik Engebretsen, Gunilla Berglund, Gerd Karin Natvig.   

Abstract

The aim of this multicenter study was to explore associations between psychosocial factors (general self-efficacy, perceived availability of social support, cancer-related distress) and health-related quality of life, among individuals at risk for hereditary cancer. One-hundred and twenty one participants with a family history of breast-cancer or colorectal cancer answered a questionnaire 2-4 weeks prior to genetic counseling. The two dimensions of the health-related quality of life measure, mental and physical health were both used as outcome variables. Multiple regression (linear) analyses revealed that increasing degrees of cancer-related distress was related to decreasing degrees of mental health whereas increasing degrees of self-efficacy and social support were related to increasing degrees of this outcome variable. Self-efficacy, self-esteem support and tangible aid seemed to moderate the relationship between cancer-related distress and mental health. These results suggest that self-efficacy and certain resources of social support buffer the negative association between cancer-related distress and mental health, and might be suitable for interventional efforts. Implications for genetic counseling practice are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15604640     DOI: 10.1023/B:JOGC.0000044202.95768.b3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  42 in total

1.  The hope construct, will, and ways: their relations with self-efficacy, optimism, and general well-being.

Authors:  P R Magaletta; J M Oliver
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1999-05

2.  Intention to undergo prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  B Meiser; P Butow; M Friedlander; V Schnieden; M Gattas; J Kirk; G Suthers; E Haan; K Tucker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Short form 36 (SF-36) health survey: normative data from the general Norwegian population.

Authors:  J H Loge; S Kaasa
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med       Date:  1998-12

4.  Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: some preliminary indicators.

Authors:  P Hopwood; F Keeling; A Long; C Pool; G Evans; A Howell
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Participation in breast cancer susceptibility testing protocols: influence of recruitment source, altruism, and family involvement on women's decisions.

Authors:  G Geller; T Doksum; B A Bernhardt; S A Metz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  The Unmet Information and Support Needs of Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer: A Descriptive Survey.

Authors:  Belinda Thewes; Bettina Meiser; Monica Tucker; Kathy Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Effects of spouses on distress experienced by BRCA1 mutation carriers over time.

Authors:  Jean E Wylie; Ken R Smith; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.908

8.  The relationship between demographic and clinical variables, and quality of life aspects in patients with psoriasis.

Authors:  A Wahl; T Moum; B R Hanestad; I Wiklund
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling.

Authors:  S Lloyd; M Watson; B Waites; L Meyer; R Eeles; S Ebbs; A Tylee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.

Authors:  A Cull; E D Anderson; S Campbell; J Mackay; E Smyth; M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Communicating genetic risk information within families: a review.

Authors:  Mel Wiseman; Caroline Dancyger; Susan Michie
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Psychosocial conditions of women awaiting genetic counseling: a population-based study.

Authors:  Ellen M Mikkelsen; Lone Sunde; Christoffer Johansen; Søren P Johnsen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Predictors of psychosocial adjustment during the postradiation treatment transition.

Authors:  Susan R Mazanec; Barbara J Daly; Sara Douglas; Carol Musil
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Is the psychological impact of genetic testing moderated by support and sharing of test results to family and friends?

Authors:  Julie Lapointe; Michel Dorval; Catherine Noguès; Roxane Fabre; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Decisions about testing and termination of pregnancy for different fetal conditions: a qualitative study of European White and Pakistani mothers of affected children.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Jenny Hewison; Josephine M Green; Howard S Cuckle; Janet Hirst; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  The influence of cancer-related distress and sense of coherence on anxiety and depression in patients with hereditary cancer: a study of patients' sense of coherence 6 months after genetic counseling.

Authors:  Elen Siglen; Cathrine Bjorvatn; Lars Fredrik Engebretsen; Gunilla Berglund; Gerd Karin Natvig
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-12       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome in the first year of colorectal cancer: a review of the psychological impact.

Authors:  Karin M Landsbergen; Judith B Prins; Han G Brunner; Floris W Kraaimaat; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Improvement in Stress, General Self-Efficacy, and Health Related Quality of Life following Patient Education for Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Trude Haugland; Marijke Veenstra; Morten H Vatn; Astrid K Wahl
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2013-04-23

10.  Associations between general self-efficacy and health-related quality of life among 12-13-year-old school children: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Lisbeth Gravdal Kvarme; Kristin Haraldstad; Sølvi Helseth; Ragnhild Sørum; Gerd Karin Natvig
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.