Literature DB >> 23264090

Unmet support needs and distress among women with a BRCA1/2 mutation.

Ashley Farrelly1, Victoria White, Bettina Meiser, Michael Jefford, Mary-Anne Young, Sandra Ieropoli, Ingrid Winship, Jessica Duffy.   

Abstract

Distress levels among female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers can be similar to levels found among breast cancer patients. While psychological distress has been associated with unmet needs among cancer patients no study has examined this among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. The objectives of this study were to: (1) describe the unmet support needs of women with a known BRCA1/2 mutation, (2) determine how unmet needs are related to psychological distress, and (3) identify variables that predict level of unmet need and distress. Female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were identified through Familial Cancer Centers in 3 Australian states. Two-hundred and seventy-nine participants completed surveys assessing need for help on 16 information and support items. The Impact of Events Scale assessed genetic test related distress. Participants reported an average of 5.4 (SD = 4.9) moderate to very high unmet needs. Twenty-one percent had scores indicating moderate distress, and 13 % indicating severe distress. Younger age (t = -3.34; p < 0.01), not having someone to confide in about the gene mutation (t = 2.57; p = 0.01) and shorter time since notification of mutation status (t = -2.49; p = 0.01) were associated with higher unmet need scores in linear regression analyses. Greater number of unmet needs was associated with a greater likelihood of moderate to severe levels of distress (OR = 1.19; p < 0.01) in logistic regression analyses. Identifying appropriate interventions that target unmet needs among younger women and those with no confidante may help to reduce distress. Interventions that provide an opportunity for women to confide in someone, such as Peer support programs, may be one way of meeting the emotional needs of this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23264090     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-012-9596-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  38 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial well-being and supportive care needs of cancer patients living in urban and rural/regional areas: a systematic review.

Authors:  Phyllis N Butow; Fiona Phillips; Janine Schweder; Kate White; Craig Underhill; David Goldstein
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group.

Authors:  R Sanson-Fisher; A Girgis; A Boyes; B Bonevski; L Burton; P Cook
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The Unmet Information and Support Needs of Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer: A Descriptive Survey.

Authors:  Belinda Thewes; Bettina Meiser; Monica Tucker; Kathy Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita Hughes; David Main; Claudine Isaacs; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  The descriptive epidemiology of female breast cancer: an international comparison of screening, incidence, survival and mortality.

Authors:  Danny R Youlden; Susanna M Cramb; Nathan A M Dunn; Jennifer M Muller; Christopher M Pyke; Peter D Baade
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  Psychological and social aspects of breast cancer.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.990

7.  Long-term psychological impact of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and prophylactic surgery: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Iris van Oostrom; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Litanja N Lodder; Hugo J Duivenvoorden; Arthur R van Gool; Caroline Seynaeve; Conny A van der Meer; Jan G M Klijn; Bert N van Geel; Curt W Burger; Juriy W Wladimiroff; Aad Tibben
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Identification of traumatic stress reactions in women at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Nangel M Lindberg; David K Wellisch
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.386

10.  The information and support needs of women at high risk of familial breast and ovarian cancer: how can cancer genetic services give patients what they want?

Authors:  Rachel Iredale; Kate Brain; Jonathon Gray; Elizabeth France
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  9 in total

1.  Implementing a telephone based peer support intervention for women with a BRCA1/2 mutation.

Authors:  Ashley Farrelly; Victoria White; Mary-Anne Young; Michael Jefford; Sandra Ieropoli; Jessica Duffy; Ingrid Winship; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Perspectives of Women Considering Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and their Peers towards a Telephone-Based Peer Support Intervention.

Authors:  D St-Pierre; K Bouchard; L Gauthier; J Chiquette; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  When knowledge of a heritable gene mutation comes out of the blue: treatment-focused genetic testing in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  B Meiser; V F Quinn; M Gleeson; J Kirk; K M Tucker; B Rahman; C Saunders; K J Watts; M Peate; E Geelhoed; K Barlow-Stewart; M Field; M Harris; Y C Antill; G Mitchell
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Psychological Distress, Anxiety, and Depression of Cancer-Affected BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Johanna Ringwald; Christina Wochnowski; Kristin Bosse; Katrin Elisabeth Giel; Norbert Schäffeler; Stephan Zipfel; Martin Teufel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  The needs of Southeast Asian BRCA mutation carriers considering risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Hamizah Sa'at; Yew-Kong Lee; Sook-Yee Yoon; Siu Wan Wong; Yin Ling Woo; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Nur Aishah Mohd Taib
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Patient-Centered Care in Breast Cancer Genetic Clinics.

Authors:  Anne Brédart; Amélie Anota; Julia Dick; Violetta Kuboth; Olivier Lareyre; Antoine De Pauw; Alejandra Cano; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Rita Schmutzler; Sylvie Dolbeault; Jean-Luc Kop
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Communication about genetic testing with breast and ovarian cancer patients: a scoping review.

Authors:  Chris Jacobs; Christine Patch; Susan Michie
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Psychosocial problems in women attending French, German and Spanish genetics clinics before and after targeted or multigene testing results: an observational prospective study.

Authors:  Anne Brédart; Jean-Luc Kop; Julia Dick; Alejandra Cano; Antoine De Pauw; Amélie Anota; Joan Brunet; Peter Devilee; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Rita Schmutzler; Sylvie Dolbeault
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Effect of Inquiry-Based Stress Reduction on Well-being and Views on Risk-Reducing Surgery Among Women With BRCA Variants in Israel: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Carla Landau; Anne Marie Novak; Ariel B Ganz; Benjamin Rolnik; Eitan Friedman; Shahar Lev-Ari
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-12-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.