Literature DB >> 25820212

Implementing a telephone based peer support intervention for women with a BRCA1/2 mutation.

Ashley Farrelly1, Victoria White, Mary-Anne Young, Michael Jefford, Sandra Ieropoli, Jessica Duffy, Ingrid Winship, Bettina Meiser.   

Abstract

Women with a BRCA1/2 gene mutation face complex risk management decisions and communication issues that can lead to increased levels of distress and unmet needs. We describe the implementation of a peer-support program that aims to reduce distress among women with a BRCA1/2 mutation, including peer and support recipient satisfaction with the program, challenges and lessons learnt. Participants with a BRCA1/2 mutation were matched with a trained peer volunteer (also a mutation carrier) to have regular one-on-one phone calls, over 4 months. Details of the calls, including topics discussed, time spent and number, were collected. Peers and recipients completed surveys assessing how they felt the contact went, satisfaction with the program, and preferences for matching. Satisfaction with the program was high for both peers and recipients. 80% of pairs ended contact through mutual agreement. Peers and recipients differed in the importance placed on age and surgery experience to determine matches. The most challenging aspect of the program for peers was difficulty in contacting recipients. Peer support for women with a BRCA1/2 mutation is feasible. However, to encourage continued involvement by peers and recipients greater flexibility in the method and delivery of contact is needed. We advocate the use of text-messaging and/or email as mechanisms for pairs to arrange and maintain contact. These strategies should be in addition to, rather than replacing, calls. A mixed medium intervention, where recipients can tailor the method of communication to suit their needs, may be preferable and effective, though this would need to be tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25820212     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-015-9797-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  21 in total

Review 1.  Cancer peer support programs-do they work?

Authors:  H Sharon Campbell; Marie Rose Phaneuf; Karen Deane
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-10

Review 2.  The experience and impact of chronic disease peer support interventions: a qualitative synthesis.

Authors:  Gayathri Embuldeniya; Paula Veinot; Emma Bell; Mary Bell; Joyce Nyhof-Young; Joanna E M Sale; Nicky Britten
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-02-28

3.  Randomized controlled trial of a telephone-based peer-support program for women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: impact on psychological distress.

Authors:  Victoria M White; Mary-Anne Young; Ashley Farrelly; Bettina Meiser; Michael Jefford; Elizabeth Williamson; Sandra Ieropoli; Jessica Duffy; Ingrid Winship
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The Unmet Information and Support Needs of Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer: A Descriptive Survey.

Authors:  Belinda Thewes; Bettina Meiser; Monica Tucker; Kathy Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  What models of peer support do people with colorectal cancer prefer?

Authors:  S C Ieropoli; V M White; M Jefford; D Akkerman
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.520

6.  Psychological impact of genetic testing in women from high-risk breast cancer families.

Authors:  B Meiser; P Butow; M Friedlander; A Barratt; V Schnieden; M Watson; J Brown; K Tucker
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Effect of Internet peer-support groups on psychosocial adjustment to cancer: a randomised study.

Authors:  M T Høybye; S O Dalton; I Deltour; P E Bidstrup; K Frederiksen; C Johansen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  A randomized, controlled study of Internet peer-to-peer interactions among women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  Mark S Salzer; Steven C Palmer; Katy Kaplan; Eugene Brusilovskiy; Thomas Ten Have; Maggie Hampshire; James Metz; James C Coyne
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Identification of traumatic stress reactions in women at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Nangel M Lindberg; David K Wellisch
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.386

10.  Telephone peer support for women with gynaecological cancer: benefits and challenges for supporters.

Authors:  Nancy Pistrang; Zara Jay; Sue Gessler; Chris Barker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  6 in total

1.  Perspectives of Women Considering Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and their Peers towards a Telephone-Based Peer Support Intervention.

Authors:  D St-Pierre; K Bouchard; L Gauthier; J Chiquette; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  An in-depth exploration of the post-test informational needs of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers in Asia.

Authors:  Jeanette Yuen; Si Ming Fung; Chin Leong Sia; Mallika Venkatramani; Tarryn Shaw; Eliza Courtney; Shao-Tzu Li; Jianbang Chiang; Veronique Kiak-Mien Tan; Benita Kiat-Tee Tan; Joanne Ngeow
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.857

3.  Understanding the Needs of Young Women Regarding Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Genetic Testing: Convergence and Divergence among Patient-Counselor Perceptions and the Promise of Peer Support.

Authors:  Chalanda Evans; Rebekah J Hamilton; Kenneth P Tercyak; Beth N Peshkin; Kantoniony Rabemananjara; Claudine Isaacs; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-28

4.  Disease Profiling for Computerized Peer Support of Ménière's Disease.

Authors:  Jyrki Rasku; Ilmari Pyykkö; Hilla Levo; Erna Kentala; Vinaya Manchaiah
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2015-09-03

Review 5.  Psychosocial Interventions for Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Talin Boghosian; Jeanna M McCuaig; Lindsay Carlsson; Kelly A Metcalfe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  "You Always Have It in the Back of Your Mind"-Feelings, Coping, and Support Needs of Women with Pathogenic Variants in Moderate-Risk Genes for Hereditary Breast Cancer Attending Genetic Counseling in Germany: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Authors:  Claudia Stracke; Clarissa Lemmen; Kerstin Rhiem; Rita Schmutzler; Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth; Stephanie Stock
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.