Literature DB >> 26113155

Assembly of Slx4 signaling complexes behind DNA replication forks.

Attila Balint1, TaeHyung Kim2, David Gallo1, Jose Renato Cussiol3, Francisco M Bastos de Oliveira3, Askar Yimit1, Jiongwen Ou1, Ryuichiro Nakato4, Alexey Gurevich1, Katsuhiko Shirahige4, Marcus B Smolka3, Zhaolei Zhang2, Grant W Brown5.   

Abstract

Obstructions to replication fork progression, referred to collectively as DNA replication stress, challenge genome stability. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, cells lacking RTT107 or SLX4 show genome instability and sensitivity to DNA replication stress and are defective in the completion of DNA replication during recovery from replication stress. We demonstrate that Slx4 is recruited to chromatin behind stressed replication forks, in a region that is spatially distinct from that occupied by the replication machinery. Slx4 complex formation is nucleated by Mec1 phosphorylation of histone H2A, which is recognized by the constitutive Slx4 binding partner Rtt107. Slx4 is essential for recruiting the Mec1 activator Dpb11 behind stressed replication forks, and Slx4 complexes are important for full activity of Mec1. We propose that Slx4 complexes promote robust checkpoint signaling by Mec1 by stably recruiting Dpb11 within a discrete domain behind the replication fork, during DNA replication stress.
© 2015 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage response; Dpb11; Slx4; checkpoint kinase; replication stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26113155      PMCID: PMC4557669          DOI: 10.15252/embj.201591190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  91 in total

1.  Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53.

Authors:  A A Alcasabas; A J Osborn; J Bachant; F Hu; P J Werler; K Bousset; K Furuya; J F Diffley; A M Carr; S J Elledge
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine.

Authors:  C S Gilbert; C M Green; N F Lowndes
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Mapping of early firing origins on a replication profile of budding yeast.

Authors:  Nami Yabuki; Hiromichi Terashima; Kunio Kitada
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Z Sun; J Hsiao; D S Fay; D F Stern
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-07-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications.

Authors:  C B Brachmann; A Davies; G J Cost; E Caputo; J Li; P Hieter; J D Boeke
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1998-01-30       Impact factor: 3.239

6.  NBS1 localizes to gamma-H2AX foci through interaction with the FHA/BRCT domain.

Authors:  Junya Kobayashi; Hiroshi Tauchi; Shuichi Sakamoto; Asako Nakamura; Ken-ichi Morishima; Shinya Matsuura; Toshiko Kobayashi; Katsuyuki Tamai; Keiji Tanimoto; Kenshi Komatsu
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Monitoring S phase progression globally and locally using BrdU incorporation in TK(+) yeast strains.

Authors:  A Lengronne; P Pasero; A Bensimon; E Schwob
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.

Authors:  J A Tercero; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Genetic and physical interactions between DPB11 and DDC1 in the yeast DNA damage response pathway.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Functional and physical interaction between Rad24 and Rfc5 in the yeast checkpoint pathways.

Authors:  T Shimomura; S Ando; K Matsumoto; K Sugimoto
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  21 in total

1.  Rad9/53BP1 protects stalled replication forks from degradation in Mec1/ATR-defective cells.

Authors:  Matteo Villa; Diego Bonetti; Massimo Carraro; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  MTE1 Functions with MPH1 in Double-Strand Break Repair.

Authors:  Askar Yimit; TaeHyung Kim; Ranjith P Anand; Sarah Meister; Jiongwen Ou; James E Haber; Zhaolei Zhang; Grant W Brown
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  The Rtt107 BRCT scaffold and its partner modification enzymes collaborate to promote replication.

Authors:  Lisa Hang; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.197

Review 4.  Multi-BRCT scaffolds use distinct strategies to support genome maintenance.

Authors:  Bingbing Wan; Lisa E Hang; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 5.  Slx4 scaffolding in homologous recombination and checkpoint control: lessons from yeast.

Authors:  José R Cussiol; Diego Dibitetto; Achille Pellicioli; Marcus B Smolka
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Multi-BRCT Domain Protein Brc1 Links Rhp18/Rad18 and γH2A To Maintain Genome Stability during S Phase.

Authors:  Michael C Reubens; Sophie Rozenzhak; Paul Russell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Molecular Basis for Control of Diverse Genome Stability Factors by the Multi-BRCT Scaffold Rtt107.

Authors:  Bingbing Wan; Jian Wu; Xiangzhou Meng; Ming Lei; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 8.  Control of structure-specific endonucleases to maintain genome stability.

Authors:  Pierre-Marie Dehé; Pierre-Henri L Gaillard
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 94.444

9.  Termination of Replication Stress Signaling via Concerted Action of the Slx4 Scaffold and the PP4 Phosphatase.

Authors:  Carolyn M Jablonowski; José R Cussiol; Susannah Oberly; Askar Yimit; Attila Balint; TaeHyung Kim; Zhaolei Zhang; Grant W Brown; Marcus B Smolka
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Complex Mechanisms of Antimony Genotoxicity in Budding Yeast Involves Replication and Topoisomerase I-Associated DNA Lesions, Telomere Dysfunction and Inhibition of DNA Repair.

Authors:  Ireneusz Litwin; Seweryn Mucha; Ewa Pilarczyk; Robert Wysocki; Ewa Maciaszczyk-Dziubinska
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.