Literature DB >> 11484057

Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.

J A Tercero1, J F Diffley.   

Abstract

The checkpoint kinase proteins Mec1 and Rad53 are required in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, to maintain cell viability in the presence of drugs causing damage to DNA or arrest of DNA replication forks. It is thought that they act by inhibiting cell cycle progression, allowing time for DNA repair to take place. Mec1 and Rad53 also slow S phase progression in response to DNA alkylation, although the mechanism for this and its relative importance in protecting cells from DNA damage have not been determined. Here we show that the DNA-alkylating agent methyl methanesulphonate (MMS) profoundly reduces the rate of DNA replication fork progression; however, this moderation does not require Rad53 or Mec1. The accelerated S phase in checkpoint mutants, therefore, is primarily a consequence of inappropriate initiation events. Wild-type cells ultimately complete DNA replication in the presence of MMS. In contrast, replication forks in checkpoint mutants collapse irreversibly at high rates. Moreover, the cytotoxicity of MMS in checkpoint mutants occurs specifically when cells are allowed to enter S phase with DNA damage. Thus, preventing damage-induced DNA replication fork catastrophe seems to be a primary mechanism by which checkpoints preserve viability in the face of DNA alkylation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11484057     DOI: 10.1038/35087607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  332 in total

1.  Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kyungjae Myung; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  SMC1 is a downstream effector in the ATM/NBS1 branch of the human S-phase checkpoint.

Authors:  Parvin T Yazdi; Yi Wang; Song Zhao; Nimitt Patel; Eva Y-H P Lee; Jun Qin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  UV irradiation causes the loss of viable mitotic recombinants in Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells lacking the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Fekret Osman; Irina R Tsaneva; Matthew C Whitby; Claudette L Doe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Endonuclease cleavage of blocked replication forks: An indirect pathway of DNA damage from antitumor drug-topoisomerase complexes.

Authors:  George Hong; Kenneth N Kreuzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cdk1-interacting protein Cip1 is regulated by the S phase checkpoint in response to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Ze Zhang; Ping Ren; Ajay A Vashisht; James A Wohlschlegel; David G Quintana; Fanli Zeng
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Cyclin regulation by the s phase checkpoint.

Authors:  Gloria Palou; Roger Palou; Angel Guerra-Moreno; Alba Duch; Anna Travesa; David G Quintana
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  The preference for error-free or error-prone postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to low-dose methyl methanesulfonate is cell cycle dependent.

Authors:  Dongqing Huang; Brian D Piening; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Contrasting roles of checkpoint proteins as recombination modulators at Fob1-Ter complexes with or without fork arrest.

Authors:  Bidyut K Mohanty; Narendra K Bairwa; Deepak Bastia
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2009-02-20

9.  Stabilization of stalled DNA replication forks by the BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility protein.

Authors:  Mikhail Lomonosov; Shubha Anand; Mahesh Sangrithi; Rachel Davies; Ashok R Venkitaraman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  A coordinated temporal interplay of nucleosome reorganization factor, sister chromatin cohesion factor, and DNA polymerase alpha facilitates DNA replication.

Authors:  Yanjiao Zhou; Teresa S-F Wang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.