Literature DB >> 26362319

Termination of Replication Stress Signaling via Concerted Action of the Slx4 Scaffold and the PP4 Phosphatase.

Carolyn M Jablonowski1, José R Cussiol1, Susannah Oberly1, Askar Yimit2, Attila Balint2, TaeHyung Kim3, Zhaolei Zhang3, Grant W Brown3, Marcus B Smolka4.   

Abstract

In response to replication stress, signaling mediated by DNA damage checkpoint kinases protects genome integrity. However, following repair or bypass of DNA lesions, checkpoint signaling needs to be terminated for continued cell cycle progression and proliferation. In budding yeast, the PP4 phosphatase has been shown to play a key role in preventing hyperactivation of the checkpoint kinase Rad53. In addition, we recently uncovered a phosphatase-independent mechanism for downregulating Rad53 in which the DNA repair scaffold Slx4 decreases engagement of the checkpoint adaptor Rad9 at DNA lesions. Here we reveal that proper termination of checkpoint signaling following the bypass of replication blocks imposed by alkylated DNA adducts requires the concerted action of these two fundamentally distinct mechanisms of checkpoint downregulation. Cells lacking both SLX4 and the PP4-subunit PPH3 display a synergistic increase in Rad53 signaling and are exquisitely sensitive to the DNA alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate, which induces replication blocks and extensive formation of chromosomal linkages due to template switching mechanisms required for fork bypass. Rad53 hypersignaling in these cells seems to converge to a strong repression of Mus81-Mms4, the endonuclease complex responsible for resolving chromosomal linkages, thus explaining the selective sensitivity of slx4Δ pph3Δ cells to alkylation damage. Our results support a model in which Slx4 acts locally to downregulate Rad53 activation following fork bypass, while PP4 acts on pools of active Rad53 that have diffused from the site of lesions. We propose that the proper spatial coordination of the Slx4 scaffold and PP4 action is crucial to allow timely activation of Mus81-Mms4 and, therefore, proper chromosome segregation.
Copyright © 2015 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage checkpoint; PP4; Rad53; Slx4; replication stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26362319      PMCID: PMC4649662          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.181479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  67 in total

1.  Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53.

Authors:  A A Alcasabas; A J Osborn; J Bachant; F Hu; P J Werler; K Bousset; K Furuya; J F Diffley; A M Carr; S J Elledge
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  K Myung; C Chen; R D Kolodner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine.

Authors:  C S Gilbert; C M Green; N F Lowndes
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer.

Authors:  Michael B Kastan; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1 is a new target of the Mec1/Rad53 kinase cascade during growth and in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  X Zhao; A Chabes; V Domkin; L Thelander; R Rothstein
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-07-02       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Checkpoint activation in response to double-strand breaks requires the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex.

Authors:  M Grenon; C Gilbert; N F Lowndes
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Marc F Schwartz; Jimmy K Duong; Zhaoxia Sun; Jon S Morrow; Deepti Pradhan; David F Stern
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication.

Authors:  C Santocanale; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Dot1p modulates silencing in yeast by methylation of the nucleosome core.

Authors:  Fred van Leeuwen; Philip R Gafken; Daniel E Gottschling
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  The DNA damage checkpoint response requires histone H2B ubiquitination by Rad6-Bre1 and H3 methylation by Dot1.

Authors:  Michele Giannattasio; Federico Lazzaro; Paolo Plevani; Marco Muzi-Falconi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The Rtt107 BRCT scaffold and its partner modification enzymes collaborate to promote replication.

Authors:  Lisa Hang; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.197

Review 2.  Slx4 scaffolding in homologous recombination and checkpoint control: lessons from yeast.

Authors:  José R Cussiol; Diego Dibitetto; Achille Pellicioli; Marcus B Smolka
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 3.  Recovery from the DNA Replication Checkpoint.

Authors:  Indrajit Chaudhury; Deanna M Koepp
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Histone H3G34R mutation causes replication stress, homologous recombination defects and genomic instability in S. pombe.

Authors:  Rajesh K Yadav; Carolyn M Jablonowski; Alfonso G Fernandez; Brandon R Lowe; Ryan A Henry; David Finkelstein; Kevin J Barnum; Alison L Pidoux; Yin-Ming Kuo; Jie Huang; Matthew J O'Connell; Andrew J Andrews; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Robin C Allshire; Janet F Partridge
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Mapping DNA damage-dependent genetic interactions in yeast via party mating and barcode fusion genetics.

Authors:  J Javier Díaz-Mejía; Albi Celaj; Joseph C Mellor; Atina Coté; Attila Balint; Brandon Ho; Pritpal Bansal; Fatemeh Shaeri; Marinella Gebbia; Jochen Weile; Marta Verby; Anna Karkhanina; YiFan Zhang; Cassandra Wong; Justin Rich; D'Arcy Prendergast; Gaurav Gupta; Sedide Öztürk; Daniel Durocher; Grant W Brown; Frederick P Roth
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 11.429

6.  An interplay between multiple sirtuins promotes completion of DNA replication in cells with short telomeres.

Authors:  Antoine Simoneau; Étienne Ricard; Hugo Wurtele
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 7.  DNA damage checkpoint and repair: From the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans.

Authors:  Shuangyan Yao; Yuting Feng; Yan Zhang; Jinrong Feng
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 7.271

8.  Chromosome-wide histone deacetylation by sirtuins prevents hyperactivation of DNA damage-induced signaling upon replicative stress.

Authors:  Antoine Simoneau; Étienne Ricard; Sandra Weber; Ian Hammond-Martel; Lai Hong Wong; Adnane Sellam; Guri Giaever; Corey Nislow; Martine Raymond; Hugo Wurtele
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Phosphorylation of Histone H4T80 Triggers DNA Damage Checkpoint Recovery.

Authors:  Gonzalo Millan-Zambrano; Helena Santos-Rosa; Fabio Puddu; Samuel C Robson; Stephen P Jackson; Tony Kouzarides
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 10.  Functional roles of protein phosphatase 4 in multiple aspects of cellular physiology: a friend and a foe.

Authors:  Jaehong Park; Dong-Hyun Lee
Journal:  BMB Rep       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.778

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.