Literature DB >> 26920759

MTE1 Functions with MPH1 in Double-Strand Break Repair.

Askar Yimit1, TaeHyung Kim2, Ranjith P Anand3, Sarah Meister1, Jiongwen Ou1, James E Haber3, Zhaolei Zhang2, Grant W Brown4.   

Abstract

Double-strand DNA breaks occur upon exposure of cells to ionizing radiation and certain chemical agents or indirectly through replication fork collapse at DNA damage sites. If left unrepaired, double-strand breaks can cause genome instability and cell death, and their repair can result in loss of heterozygosity. In response to DNA damage, proteins involved in double-strand break repair by homologous recombination relocalize into discrete nuclear foci. We identified 29 proteins that colocalize with recombination repair protein Rad52 in response to DNA damage. Of particular interest, Ygr042w/Mte1, a protein of unknown function, showed robust colocalization with Rad52. Mte1 foci fail to form when the DNA helicase gene MPH1 is absent. Mte1 and Mph1 form a complex and are recruited to double-strand breaks in vivo in a mutually dependent manner. MTE1 is important for resolution of Rad52 foci during double-strand break repair and for suppressing break-induced replication. Together our data indicate that Mte1 functions with Mph1 in double-strand break repair.
Copyright © 2016 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA repair; break-induced replication; double-strand breaks; loss of heterozygosity; nuclear foci; recombination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26920759      PMCID: PMC4858770          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.185454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  65 in total

1.  A chemostat array enables the spatio-temporal analysis of the yeast proteome.

Authors:  Nicolas Dénervaud; Johannes Becker; Ricard Delgado-Gonzalo; Pascal Damay; Arun S Rajkumar; Michael Unser; David Shore; Felix Naef; Sebastian J Maerkl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mph1 and Mus81-Mms4 prevent aberrant processing of mitotic recombination intermediates.

Authors:  Gerard Mazón; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations.

Authors:  D E LEA; C A COULSON
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  1949-12       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  A proteome-wide visual screen identifies fission yeast proteins localizing to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Yang Yu; Jing-Yi Ren; Jia-Min Zhang; Fang Suo; Xiao-Feng Fang; Fan Wu; Li-Lin Du
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2013-04-28

5.  Restriction of replication fork regression activities by a conserved SMC complex.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Xue; Koyi Choi; Jacob N Bonner; Tamara Chiba; Youngho Kwon; Yuanyuan Xu; Humberto Sanchez; Claire Wyman; Hengyao Niu; Xiaolan Zhao; Patrick Sung
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Chromosome rearrangements via template switching between diverged repeated sequences.

Authors:  Ranjith P Anand; Olga Tsaponina; Patricia W Greenwell; Cheng-Sheng Lee; Wei Du; Thomas D Petes; James E Haber
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Functional interplay between the 53BP1-ortholog Rad9 and the Mre11 complex regulates resection, end-tethering and repair of a double-strand break.

Authors:  Matteo Ferrari; Diego Dibitetto; Giuseppe De Gregorio; Vinay V Eapen; Chetan C Rawal; Federico Lazzaro; Michael Tsabar; Federica Marini; James E Haber; Achille Pellicioli
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Template switching during break-induced replication is promoted by the Mph1 helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Anamarija Stafa; Roberto A Donnianni; Leonid A Timashev; Alicia F Lam; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The reference genome sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: then and now.

Authors:  Stacia R Engel; Fred S Dietrich; Dianna G Fisk; Gail Binkley; Rama Balakrishnan; Maria C Costanzo; Selina S Dwight; Benjamin C Hitz; Kalpana Karra; Robert S Nash; Shuai Weng; Edith D Wong; Paul Lloyd; Marek S Skrzypek; Stuart R Miyasato; Matt Simison; J Michael Cherry
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Genome-wide single-cell-level screen for protein abundance and localization changes in response to DNA damage in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Aprotim Mazumder; Laia Quiros Pesudo; Siobhan McRee; Mark Bathe; Leona D Samson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Replication fork regression and its regulation.

Authors:  Xiangzhou Meng; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  Avoidance of APOBEC3B-induced mutation by error-free lesion bypass.

Authors:  James I Hoopes; Amber L Hughes; Lauren A Hobson; Luis M Cortez; Alexander J Brown; Steven A Roberts
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Pathways and Mechanisms that Prevent Genome Instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Christopher D Putnam; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Dbl2 Regulates Rad51 and DNA Joint Molecule Metabolism to Ensure Proper Meiotic Chromosome Segregation.

Authors:  Silvia Polakova; Lucia Molnarova; Randy W Hyppa; Zsigmond Benko; Ivana Misova; Alexander Schleiffer; Gerald R Smith; Juraj Gregan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 5.  Aberrant DNA Double-strand Break Repair Threads in Breast Carcinoma: Orchestrating Genomic Insult Survival.

Authors:  Azad Kumar; Shruti Purohit; Nilesh Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016-12-30

6.  The ZGRF1 Helicase Promotes Recombinational Repair of Replication-Blocking DNA Damage in Human Cells.

Authors:  André Brannvoll; Xiaoyu Xue; Youngho Kwon; Smaragdi Kompocholi; Anne Katrine W Simonsen; Keerthana S Viswalingam; Leticia Gonzalez; Ian D Hickson; Vibe H Oestergaard; Hocine W Mankouri; Patrick Sung; Michael Lisby
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Network Rewiring of Homologous Recombination Enzymes during Mitotic Proliferation and Meiosis.

Authors:  Philipp Wild; Aitor Susperregui; Ilaria Piazza; Christian Dörig; Ashwini Oke; Meret Arter; Miyuki Yamaguchi; Alexander T Hilditch; Karla Vuina; Ki Choi Chan; Tatiana Gromova; James E Haber; Jennifer C Fung; Paola Picotti; Joao Matos
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 8.  Resolvases, Dissolvases, and Helicases in Homologous Recombination: Clearing the Road for Chromosome Segregation.

Authors:  Pedro A San-Segundo; Andrés Clemente-Blanco
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 9.  Replication-Associated Recombinational Repair: Lessons from Budding Yeast.

Authors:  Jacob N Bonner; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Smc5/6 Mediated Sumoylation of the Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1 Complex Promotes Removal of Recombination Intermediates.

Authors:  Jacob N Bonner; Koyi Choi; Xiaoyu Xue; Nikko P Torres; Barnabas Szakal; Lei Wei; Bingbing Wan; Meret Arter; Joao Matos; Patrick Sung; Grant W Brown; Dana Branzei; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 9.423

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.