Literature DB >> 26103178

An evaluation of the stability of image-quality parameters of Varian on-board imaging (OBI) and EPID imaging systems.

Dennis N Stanley1, Nikos Papanikolaou, Alonso N Gutierrez.   

Abstract

Quality assurance (QA) of the image quality for image-guided localization systems is crucial to ensure accurate visualization and localization of regions of interest within the patient. In this study, the temporal stability of selected image parameters was assessed and evaluated for kV CBCT mode, planar radiographic kV, and MV modes. The motivation of the study was to better characterize the temporal variability in specific image-quality parameters. The CATPHAN, QckV-1, and QC-3 phantoms were used to evaluate the image-quality parameters of the imaging systems on a Varian Novalis Tx linear accelerator. The planar radiographic images were analyzed in PIPSpro with high-contrast spatial resolution (f30, f40,f50 lp/mm) being recorded. For OBI kV CBCT, high-quality head full-fan acquisition and pelvis half-fan acquisition modes were evaluated for uniformity, noise, spatial resolution, HU constancy, and geometric distortion. Dose and X-ray energy for the OBI were recorded using the Unfors RaySafe Xi system with the R/F High Detector for kV planar radiographic and the CT detector for kV CBCT. Dose for the MV EPID was recorded using a PTW975 Semiflex ion chamber, PTW UNIDOS electrometer, and CNMC Plastic Water. For each image-quality parameter, values were normalized to the mean, and the normalized standard deviations were recorded to evaluate the parameter's temporal variability. For planar radiographic modes, the normalized standard deviations of the spatial resolution (f30, f40, & f50) were 0.015, 0.008, 0.004 lp/mm and 0.006, 0.009, 0.018 lp/mm for the kV and MV, respectively. The normalized standard deviation of dose for kV and MV were 0.010 mGy and 0.005mGy, respectively. The standard deviations for full- and half-fan kV CBCT modes were averaged together. The following normalized standard deviations for each kV CBCT parameter were: 0.075 HU (uniformity), 0.071 HU (noise), 0.006mm (AP-geometric distortion), 0.005 mm (LAT-geometric distortion), 0.058mm (slice thickness), 0.124 (f50), 0.031 (HU constancy - Lung), 0.063 (HU constancy- Water), 0.020 (HU constancy - Bone), 0.006 mGy (Dose - Center), 0.004 mGy (Dose -Periphery). Using control chart analysis, institutional QA tolerances were reported as warning and action thresholds based on 1σ and 2σ thresholds. A study was performed to characterize the stability of image-quality parameters recommended by AAPM Task Group-142 for the Varian OBI and EPID imaging systems. Both imaging systems show consistent imaging and dosimetric properties over the evaluated time frame.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26103178      PMCID: PMC5690094          DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  17 in total

Review 1.  Image guidance for precise conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Thomas Rockwell Mackie; Jeff Kapatoes; Ken Ruchala; Weiguo Lu; Chuan Wu; Gustavo Olivera; Lisa Forrest; Wolfgang Tome; Jim Welsh; Robert Jeraj; Paul Harari; Paul Reckwerdt; Bhudatt Paliwal; Mark Ritter; Harry Keller; Jack Fowler; Minesh Mehta
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Quality assurance for image-guided radiation therapy utilizing CT-based technologies: a report of the AAPM TG-179.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Bissonnette; Peter A Balter; Lei Dong; Katja M Langen; D Michael Lovelock; Moyed Miften; Douglas J Moseley; Jean Pouliot; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Sua Yoo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Clinical application of image-guided radiotherapy, IGRT (on the Varian OBI platform).

Authors:  Bruno Sorcini; Aris Tilikidis
Journal:  Cancer Radiother       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 1.018

4.  Dose assessment from an online kilovoltage imaging system in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Ernest K Osei; Bryan Schaly; Andre Fleck; Paule Charland; Rob Barnett
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 1.394

5.  Quality assurance for the geometric accuracy of cone-beam CT guidance in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Bissonnette; Doug Moseley; Elizabeth White; Michael Sharpe; Tom Purdie; David A Jaffray
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators.

Authors:  Eric E Klein; Joseph Hanley; John Bayouth; Fang-Fang Yin; William Simon; Sean Dresser; Christopher Serago; Francisco Aguirre; Lijun Ma; Bijan Arjomandy; Chihray Liu; Carlos Sandin; Todd Holmes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  The run chart: a simple analytical tool for learning from variation in healthcare processes.

Authors:  Rocco J Perla; Lloyd P Provost; Sandy K Murray
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  A practical method to routinely monitor resolution in digital images.

Authors:  R T Droege
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  A dose comparison study between XVI and OBI CBCT systems.

Authors:  William Y Song; Srijit Kamath; Shuichi Ozawa; Shlomi Al Ani; Alexei Chvetsov; Niranjan Bhandare; Jatinder R Palta; Chihray Liu; Jonathan G Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  A simple quality assurance test tool for the visual verification of light and radiation field congruent using electronic portal images device and computed radiography.

Authors:  Christopher F Njeh; Blas Caroprese; Pushkar Desai
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  7 in total

1.  Quantitative evaluation of patient setup uncertainty of stereotactic radiotherapy with the frameless 6D ExacTrac system using statistical modeling.

Authors:  Vance Keeling; Sabbir Hossain; Hosang Jin; Ozer Algan; Salahuddin Ahmad; Imad Ali
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  An evaluation of the stability of image quality parameters of Elekta X-ray volume imager and iViewGT imaging systems.

Authors:  Dennis N Stanley; Karl Rasmussen; Neil Kirby; Nikos Papanikolaou; Alonso N Gutiérrez
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  The Mobius AIRO mobile CT for image-guided proton therapy: Characterization & commissioning.

Authors:  Jasmine A Oliver; Omar A Zeidan; Sanford L Meeks; Amish P Shah; Jason Pukala; Patrick Kelly; Naren R Ramakrishna; Twyla R Willoughby
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Study of Variation in Dose Calculation Accuracy Between kV Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and kV fan-Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Venkatesan Kaliyaperumal; C Jomon Raphael; K Mathew Varghese; Paul Gopu; S Sivakumar; Minu Boban; N Arunai Nambi Raj; K Senthilnathan; P Ramesh Babu
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

5.  Determination of machine-specific tolerances using statistical process control analysis of long-term uniform scanning proton machine QA results.

Authors:  Suresh Rana; Colton Eckert; Hardev Singh; Yuanshui Zheng; Michael Chacko; Mark Storey; John Chang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  CBCT image quality QA: Establishing a quantitative program.

Authors:  Sameer Taneja; David L Barbee; Anthony J Rea; Martha Malin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.243

7.  Improvement in bladder volume reproducibility using A-mode portable ultrasound bladder scanner in moderate-hypofractionated volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Shingo Ohira; Riho Komiyama; Naoyuki Kanayama; Kayo Sakai; Takero Hirata; Kento Yoshikata; Yoshihiro Ueda; Masayoshi Miyazaki; Masashi Nakayama; Masahiko Koizumi; Koji Konishi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.