Literature DB >> 21228075

The run chart: a simple analytical tool for learning from variation in healthcare processes.

Rocco J Perla1, Lloyd P Provost, Sandy K Murray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Those working in healthcare today are challenged more than ever before to quickly and efficiently learn from data to improve their services and delivery of care. There is broad agreement that healthcare professionals working on the front lines benefit greatly from the visual display of data presented in time order. AIM: To describe the run chart-an analytical tool commonly used by professionals in quality improvement but underutilised in healthcare.
METHODS: A standard approach to the construction, use and interpretation of run charts for healthcare applications is developed based on the statistical process control literature. DISCUSSION: Run charts allow us to understand objectively if the changes we make to a process or system over time lead to improvements and do so with minimal mathematical complexity. This method of analyzing and reporting data is of greater value to improvement projects and teams than traditional aggregate summary statistics that ignore time order. Because of its utility and simplicity, the run chart has wide potential application in healthcare for practitioners and decision-makers. Run charts also provide the foundation for more sophisticated methods of analysis and learning such as Shewhart (control) charts and planned experimentation.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21228075     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs.2009.037895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  123 in total

1.  Increasing recruitment rates in an inpatient clinical research study using quality improvement methods.

Authors:  Hadley S Sauers; Andrew F Beck; Robert S Kahn; Jeffrey M Simmons
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2014-11

Review 2.  A practical guide to implementing clinical audit.

Authors:  Nicole Rose; Daniel S J Pang
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 3.  Inpatient Falls: Defining the Problem and Identifying Possible Solutions. Part II: Application of Quality Improvement Principles to Hospital Falls.

Authors:  Ethan U Cumbler; Jennifer R Simpson; Laura D Rosenthal; David J Likosky
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2013-10

Review 4.  Ensuring success and sustainability of a quality improvement project.

Authors:  T Lawson; L Weekes; M Hill
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2018-03-16

Review 5.  Quality improvement in pediatric nephrology-a practical guide.

Authors:  Marie-Michele Gaudreault-Tremblay; Rory F McQuillan; Rulan S Parekh; Damien Noone
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Temporal Trends of Hospitalization, Mortality, and Financial Impact Related to Preeclampsia with Severe Features in Hawai'i and the United States.

Authors:  Ji Hae Lee; Guangxiang Zhang; Scott Harvey; Kazuma Nakagawa
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2019-08

7.  Narrowing Care Gaps for Early Language Delay: A Quality Improvement Study.

Authors:  Courtney M Brown; Andrew F Beck; Wendy Steuerwald; Elizabeth Alexander; Zeina M Samaan; Robert S Kahn; Mona Mansour
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 1.168

8.  Addressing barriers to surgical evaluation for patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  Chloe E Hill; Jackie Raab; Delight Roberts; Timothy Lucas; John Pollard; Ammar Kheder; Brian Litt; Kathryn A Davis
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.937

9.  Persistent lactic acidosis after chronic topical application of silver sulfadiazine in a pediatric burn patient: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Monte S Willis; Bruce A Cairns; Ashley Purdy; Andrey V Bortsov; Samuel W Jones; Shiara M Ortiz-Pujols; Tina M Schade Willis; Benny L Joyner
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2013-01-24

10.  Reliable individualized monitoring improves cholesterol control in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  David K Hooper; Cassie L Kirby; Peter A Margolis; Jens Goebel
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.