Andreas Fuchs1, J Tobias Kühl2, Marcus Y Chen3, Steffen Helqvist2, Marco Razeto4, Kazumasa Arakita5, Chloe Steveson5, Andrew E Arai3, Klaus F Kofoed6. 1. Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark. Electronic address: mck601@alumni.ku.dk. 2. Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark. 3. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. Toshiba Medical Visualization Systems Europe, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. 5. Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Japan. 6. Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The reader confidence and diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) can be compromised by the presence of calcified plaques and stents causing blooming artifacts. Compared to conventional invasive coronary angiography (ICA), this may cause an overestimation of stenosis severity leading to false-positive results. In a pilot study, we tested the feasibility of a new coronary calcium image subtraction algorithm in relation to reader confidence and diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Forty-three patients underwent clinically indicated ICA and CCTA using a 320-detector row CT. Median Agatston score was 510. Two data sets were reconstructed: a conventional CCTA (CCTAconv) and a subtracted CCTA (CCTAsub), where calcifications detected on noncontrast images were subtracted from the CCTA. Reader confidence and concordance with ICA for identification of >50% stenosis were recorded. We defined target segments on CCTAconv as motion-free coronary segments with calcification or stent and low reader confidence. The effect of CCTAsub was assessed. No approval from the ethics committee was required according to Danish law. RESULTS: A total of 76 target segments were identified. The use of coronary calcium image subtraction improved the reader confidence in 66% of these segments. In target segments, specificity (86% vs 65%; P < .01) and positive predictive value (71% vs 51%, P = .03) were improved using CCTAsub compared to CCTAconv without loss in negative predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience with coronary calcium image subtraction suggests that it is feasible and could lead to an improvement in reader confidence and diagnostic accuracy for identification of significant coronary artery disease.
BACKGROUND: The reader confidence and diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) can be compromised by the presence of calcified plaques and stents causing blooming artifacts. Compared to conventional invasive coronary angiography (ICA), this may cause an overestimation of stenosis severity leading to false-positive results. In a pilot study, we tested the feasibility of a new coronary calcium image subtraction algorithm in relation to reader confidence and diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Forty-three patients underwent clinically indicated ICA and CCTA using a 320-detector row CT. Median Agatston score was 510. Two data sets were reconstructed: a conventional CCTA (CCTAconv) and a subtracted CCTA (CCTAsub), where calcifications detected on noncontrast images were subtracted from the CCTA. Reader confidence and concordance with ICA for identification of >50% stenosis were recorded. We defined target segments on CCTAconv as motion-free coronary segments with calcification or stent and low reader confidence. The effect of CCTAsub was assessed. No approval from the ethics committee was required according to Danish law. RESULTS: A total of 76 target segments were identified. The use of coronary calcium image subtraction improved the reader confidence in 66% of these segments. In target segments, specificity (86% vs 65%; P < .01) and positive predictive value (71% vs 51%, P = .03) were improved using CCTAsub compared to CCTAconv without loss in negative predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience with coronary calcium image subtraction suggests that it is feasible and could lead to an improvement in reader confidence and diagnostic accuracy for identification of significant coronary artery disease.
Authors: Daniel B Mark; Daniel S Berman; Matthew J Budoff; J Jeffrey Carr; Thomas C Gerber; Harvey S Hecht; Mark A Hlatky; John McB Hodgson; Michael S Lauer; Julie M Miller; Richard L Morin; Debabrata Mukherjee; Michael Poon; Geoffrey D Rubin; Robert S Schwartz Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2010-08-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Stephen Schroeder; Stephan Achenbach; Frank Bengel; Christof Burgstahler; Filippo Cademartiri; Pim de Feyter; Richard George; Philipp Kaufmann; Andreas F Kopp; Juhani Knuuti; Dieter Ropers; Joanne Schuijf; Laurens F Tops; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Gilbert L Raff; Aiden Abidov; Stephan Achenbach; Daniel S Berman; Lawrence M Boxt; Matthew J Budoff; Victor Cheng; Tony DeFrance; Jeffrey C Hellinger; Ronald P Karlsberg Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2009-01-29
Authors: Julie M Miller; Carlos E Rochitte; Marc Dewey; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Ilan Gottlieb; Narinder Paul; Melvin E Clouse; Edward P Shapiro; John Hoe; Albert C Lardo; David E Bush; Albert de Roos; Christopher Cox; Jeffery Brinker; João A C Lima Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-11-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Cynthia H McCollough; Andrew N Primak; Natalie Braun; James Kofler; Lifeng Yu; Jodie Christner Journal: Radiol Clin North Am Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Andreas Fuchs; J Tobias Kühl; Marcus Y Chen; David Viladés Medel; Xavier Alomar; Sujata M Shanbhag; Steffen Helqvist; Klaus F Kofoed Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Sarah Vaalma; Jürgen Rahmer; Nikolaos Panagiotopoulos; Robert L Duschka; Jörn Borgert; Jörg Barkhausen; Florian M Vogt; Julian Haegele Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 3.240