Literature DB >> 30196453

A phantom based evaluation of vessel lumen area quantification for coronary CT angiography.

Sabee Molloi1,2, Travis Johnson3, Jerry Lipinski3, Huanjun Ding3, Logan Hubbard4.   

Abstract

Coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography is a noninvasive method for visualizing coronary artery disease. However, coronary CT angiography is limited in assessment of stenosis severity by the partial volume effect and calcification. Therefore, an accurate method for assessment of stenosis severity is needed. A 10 cm diameter cylindrical Lucite phantom with holes in the range of 0.4-4.5 mm diameter was fitted in a chest phantom. The holes were filled with an iodine solution of 8 mg/mL. To simulate coronary artery disease, different levels of stenosis were created by inserting Lucite rods into the holes with diameter range of 2-4.5 mm. The resulting lumen cross sectional areas ranged from 1.4 to 12.3 mm2. To simulate arterial calcification, calcium hydroxyapatite rods were inserted into the holes with diameter range of 2-4.5 mm. Images of the phantoms were acquired at 100 kVp using a 320-slice CT scanner. A maual and a semi-automated technique based on integrated Hounsfield units was used to calculate vessel cross-sectional area. There was an excellent correlation between the measured and the known cross-sectional area for both normal and stenotic vessels using the manual and the semi-automated techniques. However, the overall measurement error for the manual method was more than twice as compared with the integrated HU technique. Determination of vessel lumen area using the semi-automated integrated Hounsfield unit technique yields more than a factor of two improvement in precision and accuracy as compared to the existing manual technique for vessels with and without stenosis. This technique can also be used to accurately measure arterial cross-sectional area in the presence of coronary calcification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiography; Computed tomography; Coronary artery disease; Imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30196453      PMCID: PMC6689150          DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-1452-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  20 in total

1.  Noninvasive coronary angiography--an acceptable alternative?

Authors:  S Achenbach; W G Daniel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-12-27       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Limitations of computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Steven E Nissen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Coronary vessel and luminal area measurement using dual-source computed tomography in comparison with intravascular ultrasound: effect of window settings on measurement accuracy.

Authors:  Mohamed Marwan; Tobias Pflederer; Tiziano Schepis; Martin Seltmann; Dieter Ropers; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  The present state of coronary computed tomography angiography a process in evolution.

Authors:  James K Min; Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Alexander W Leber; Andreas Knez; Franz von Ziegler; Alexander Becker; Konstantin Nikolaou; Stephan Paul; Bernd Wintersperger; Maximilian Reiser; Christoph R Becker; Gerhard Steinbeck; Peter Boekstegers
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Patient-specific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries.

Authors:  H J Kim; I E Vignon-Clementel; J S Coogan; C A Figueroa; K E Jansen; C A Taylor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain.

Authors:  James A Goldstein; Michael J Gallagher; William W O'Neill; Michael A Ross; Brian J O'Neil; Gilbert L Raff
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina.

Authors:  W Bob Meijboom; Carlos A G Van Mieghem; Niels van Pelt; Annick Weustink; Francesca Pugliese; Nico R Mollet; Eric Boersma; Eveline Regar; Robert J van Geuns; Peter J de Jaegere; Patrick W Serruys; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT.

Authors:  Julie M Miller; Carlos E Rochitte; Marc Dewey; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Ilan Gottlieb; Narinder Paul; Melvin E Clouse; Edward P Shapiro; John Hoe; Albert C Lardo; David E Bush; Albert de Roos; Christopher Cox; Jeffery Brinker; João A C Lima
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial.

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; David Dowe; James G Jollis; Michael Gitter; John Sutherland; Edward Halamert; Markus Scherer; Raye Bellinger; Arthur Martin; Robert Benton; Augustin Delago; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Gabriel T R Pereira; Luis A P Dallan; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan De Sutter; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Van de Veire; Joachim Lotz
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Reduced-iodine-dose dual-energy coronary CT angiography: qualitative and quantitative comparison between virtual monochromatic and polychromatic CT images.

Authors:  David C Rotzinger; Salim A Si-Mohamed; Jérôme Yerly; Sara Boccalini; Fabio Becce; Loïc Boussel; Reto A Meuli; Salah D Qanadli; Philippe C Douek
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.