Literature DB >> 27838897

Accurate quantification of vessel cross-sectional area using CT angiography: a simulation study.

Sabee Molloi1, Travis Johnson2, Huanjun Ding2, Jerry Lipinski2.   

Abstract

Coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography is a noninvasive method for visualizing coronary atherosclerosis. However, CT angiography is limited in assessment of stenosis severity by the partial volume effect and calcification. Therefore, a quantitative method for assessment of stenosis severity is needed. Polyenergetic fan beam CT simulations were performed to match the geometry of a 320-slice CT scanner. Contrast-enhanced vessel lumens were modeled as 8 mg/ml Iodine solution against a lipid background. Normal vessels were simulated by circles with diameters in the range of 0.1-3 mm. To simulate lesions, 2, 3, and 4 mm diameter vessels were simulated with area stenoses in a range of 10-90 %. The occlusion was created by a circular region of lipid placed within the lumen resulting in a crescent shaped lumen. Each vessel was simulated three times to obtain multiple noise realizations for a total of 126 vessels. Two trained readers performed manual cross-sectional area measurements in simulated normal and stenotic vessels. A new, semi-automated technique based on integrated Hounsfield units was also used to calculate vessel cross-sectional area. There was an excellent correlation between the measured and the known cross-sectional area for both normal and stenotic vessels using the manual and the semi-automated techniques. However, the overall measurement error for the manual method was more than twice as compared with the integrated HU technique. Determination of vessel cross-sectional area using the semi-automated integrated Hounsfield unit technique yields more than a factor of two improvement in accuracy as compared to the existing manual technique for vessels with and without stenosis. This technique can also be used to correct for the effect of coronary calcification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiography; Coronary disease; Imaging; Tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27838897     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-1007-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  21 in total

1.  Noninvasive coronary angiography--an acceptable alternative?

Authors:  S Achenbach; W G Daniel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-12-27       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A validated predictive model of coronary fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Yunlong Huo; Mark Svendsen; Jenny Susana Choy; Z-D Zhang; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Limitations of computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Steven E Nissen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  The present state of coronary computed tomography angiography a process in evolution.

Authors:  James K Min; Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV.

Authors:  J M Boone; J A Seibert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  3D forward and back-projection for X-ray CT using separable footprints.

Authors:  Yong Long; Jeffrey A Fessler; James M Balter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study.

Authors:  Bon-Kwon Koo; Andrejs Erglis; Joon-Hyung Doh; David V Daniels; Sanda Jegere; Hyo-Soo Kim; Allison Dunning; Tony DeFrance; Alexandra Lansky; Jonathan Leipsic; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain.

Authors:  James A Goldstein; Michael J Gallagher; William W O'Neill; Michael A Ross; Brian J O'Neil; Gilbert L Raff
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina.

Authors:  W Bob Meijboom; Carlos A G Van Mieghem; Niels van Pelt; Annick Weustink; Francesca Pugliese; Nico R Mollet; Eric Boersma; Eveline Regar; Robert J van Geuns; Peter J de Jaegere; Patrick W Serruys; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography.

Authors:  James K Min; Jonathon Leipsic; Michael J Pencina; Daniel S Berman; Bon-Kwon Koo; Carlos van Mieghem; Andrejs Erglis; Fay Y Lin; Allison M Dunning; Patricia Apruzzese; Matthew J Budoff; Jason H Cole; Farouc A Jaffer; Martin B Leon; Jennifer Malpeso; G B John Mancini; Seung-Jung Park; Robert S Schwartz; Leslee J Shaw; Laura Mauri
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  A phantom based evaluation of vessel lumen area quantification for coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Sabee Molloi; Travis Johnson; Jerry Lipinski; Huanjun Ding; Logan Hubbard
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Cardiovascular imaging 2016 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Vande Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.357

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.