Literature DB >> 26084474

Efficacy of lead foil for reducing doses in the head and neck: a simulation study using digital intraoral systems.

Y Nejaim1, A I V Silva1, D M Brasil1, K F Vasconcelos1, F Haiter Neto1, F N Boscolo1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of lead foils in reducing the radiation dose received by different anatomical sites of the head and neck during periapical intraoral examinations performed with digital systems.
METHODS: Images were acquired through four different manners: phosphor plate (PSP; VistaScan(®) system; Dürr Dental GmbH, Bissingen, Germany) alone, PSP plus lead foil, complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS; DIGORA(®) Toto, Soredex(®), Tuusula, Finland) alone and CMOS plus lead foil. Radiation dose was measured after a full-mouth periapical series (14 radiographs) using the long-cone paralleling technique. Lithium fluoride (LiF 100) thermoluminescent dosemeters were placed in an anthropomorphic phantom at points corresponding to the tongue, thyroid, crystalline lenses, parotid glands and maxillary sinuses.
RESULTS: Dosemeter readings demonstrated the efficacy of the addition of lead foil in the intraoral digital X-ray systems provided in reducing organ doses in the selected structures, approximately 32% in the PSP system and 59% in the CMOS system.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of lead foils associated with digital X-ray sensors is an effective alternative for the protection of different anatomical sites of the head and neck during full-mouth periapical series acquisition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dental digital radiography; radiation protection; thermoluminescent dosimetry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26084474      PMCID: PMC4628421          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20150065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  12 in total

1.  Dose response of a storage phosphor system for intraoral radiography.

Authors:  H C Stamatakis; U Welander; W D McDavid
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Optimisation of patient doses in programmable dental panoramic radiography.

Authors:  A R Lecomber; S L Downes; M Mokhtari; K Faulkner
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  A comparison of the effective dose from scanography with periapical radiography.

Authors:  F Gijbels; R Jacobs; G Sanderink; E De Smet; B Nowak; J Van Dam; D Van Steenberghe
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography: a comparison with periapical radiography.

Authors:  A Ekestubbe; A Thilander-Klang; A Lith; H-G Gröndahl
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Factors influencing the absorbed dose in intraoral radiography.

Authors:  G Kaeppler; K Dietz; K Herz; S Reinert
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Comparison of the efficacy and technical accuracy of different rectangular collimators for intraoral radiography.

Authors:  Wenjian Zhang; Kenneth Abramovitch; Walter Thames; Inga-Lill K Leon; Dan C Colosi; Arthur D Goren
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2009-05-22

Review 7.  Work flow with digital intraoral radiography: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ann Wenzel; Anne Møystad
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Methods of determining the effective dose in dental radiology.

Authors:  Anne Thilander-Klang; Ebba Helmrot
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 0.972

9.  Cone beam computed tomography: a tool for the diagnosis of confusing periapical lesions in conventional radiographs.

Authors:  Luciana Maria Paes da Silva Ramos Fernandes; Camila Lopes Cardoso; Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen; Ana Lucia Alvares Capelozza
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

10.  Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography - assessment of visibility of file length placed in the root canal: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Vaiyapuri Ravi; Priyadarshini Lipee; Canagapalli Venkat Nakabushan Rao; Lakshminarayanan Lakshmikanthan
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2012-08
View more
  4 in total

1.  DIMITRA paediatric skull phantoms: development of age-specific paediatric models for dentomaxillofacial radiology research.

Authors:  Anne Caroline Oenning; Benjamin Salmon; Karla de Faria Vasconcelos; Laura Ferreira Pinheiro Nicolielo; Ivo Lambrichts; Gerard Sanderink; Ruben Pauwels; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Influence of the incorporation of a lead foil to intraoral digital receptors on the image quality and root fracture diagnosis.

Authors:  Amanda Farias Gomes; Yuri Nejaim; Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Deborah Queiroz Freitas
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Does the addition of a lead foil to digital radiographic receptors influence image contrast and approximal caries lesions diagnosis?

Authors:  Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele; Yuri Nejaim; Amanda Farias Gomes; Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Deborah Queiroz Freitas
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Benefits of using a photostimulable phosphor plate protective device.

Authors:  Graziela de Moura; Mariana Boessio Vizzotto; Priscila Fernanda da Silveira Tiecher; Nádia Assein Arús; Heraldo Luis Dias da Silveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.525

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.