Literature DB >> 15313999

Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography: a comparison with periapical radiography.

A Ekestubbe1, A Thilander-Klang, A Lith, H-G Gröndahl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare absorbed and effective doses from scanographic and zonographic examinations performed in the Scanora unit with intraoral periapical radiography.
METHODS: Absorbed dose measurements were made on an anthropomorphic phantom head with LiF thermoluminescent dosemeters in the regions of the pituitary gland, eye lenses, parotid glands, submandibular glands, thyroid gland and skin. Energy imparted was calculated from the measurements of air collision kerma and effective doses by using the quotient 24 mSv J-1 between energy imparted and effective dose. The upper and lower third molar region was examined with intraoral radiographs and with ramus scanograms, dental scanograms and dental zonograms. Radiation dose measurements were also performed for Scanora panoramic radiography (jaw and dental).
RESULTS: The effective doses for the ramus and dental scanograms were 0.01 mSv, similar or lower than for intraoral radiography. Zonography yielded the highest effective dose (0.03 mSv). Except for the skin doses, the salivary glands received the highest doses. Salivary gland doses were slightly higher from narrow beam than from intraoral radiography.
CONCLUSIONS: Detail narrow beam radiography with the Scanora is an alternative to periapical radiography and is preferred, from a radiation dose point of view, over zonography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15313999     DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/24877187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  5 in total

Review 1.  Exposing the thyroid to radiation: a review of its current extent, risks, and implications.

Authors:  Bridget Sinnott; Elaine Ron; Arthur B Schneider
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Comparative assessment of periapical radiography and CBCT imaging for radiodiagnostics in the posterior maxilla.

Authors:  Maryam Shahbazian; Charlotte Vandewoude; Jan Wyatt; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Efficacy of lead foil for reducing doses in the head and neck: a simulation study using digital intraoral systems.

Authors:  Y Nejaim; A I V Silva; D M Brasil; K F Vasconcelos; F Haiter Neto; F N Boscolo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Thyroid Radiation Dose to Patients from Diagnostic Radiology Procedures over Eight Decades: 1930-2010.

Authors:  Lienard A Chang; Donald L Miller; Choonsik Lee; Dunstana R Melo; Daphnée Villoing; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Sarah J Winters; Michael Labrake; Charles F Myers; Hyeyeun Lim; Cari M Kitahara; Martha S Linet; Steven L Simon
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Trends in Estimated Thyroid, Salivary Gland, Brain, and Eye Lens Doses From Intraoral Dental Radiography Over Seven Decades (1940 TO 2009).

Authors:  R C Fontana; E Pasqual; D L Miller; S L Simon; E Cardis; I Thierry-Chef
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.922

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.