Literature DB >> 33411592

Benefits of using a photostimulable phosphor plate protective device.

Graziela de Moura1, Mariana Boessio Vizzotto1, Priscila Fernanda da Silveira Tiecher1, Nádia Assein Arús1, Heraldo Luis Dias da Silveira1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop and test a protective device (PD) to increase the resistance of photostimulable storage phosphor (PSP) plate to compressive load, and assess the resulting image quality.
METHODS: Two prototypes, polyvinylchloride sheets of 0.3 mm and 0.7 mm each, were developed for PSP plate size 2. The resistance to compressive load was tested using eight new PSPs divided into four test groups: (1) PSP, (2) PSP and paperboard protector, (3) PSP and 0.3 mm PD, and (4) PSP and 0.7 mm PD. The resulting images were analyzed by three oral radiologists, based on the consensus for image artifacts. Additionally, the objective image quality test was performed with four new PSPs, using an 8-step wedge aluminum scale. The mean gray values and standard deviation were measured in a total of 240 images, and the data were analyzed using analysis of variance with Bonferroni post-hoc test.
RESULTS: Artifacts were seen in the PSP control group starting at 40 n, and at 150 n, 175 n and 300 n in 0.3 mm PD, paperboard protector and 0.7 mm PD, respectively. Although there was no statistical difference among groups, there were differences between exposure times (0.06-0.25 s, 0.06-0.40 s, and 0.10-0.40 s). Scanning resolution of 20 lp/mm showed higher mean gray value than 25 and 40 lp/mm (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The developed PDs improved the PSP resistance to compressive forces, with low interference on the pixel gray values, regardless of exposure time and spatial resolution. Nevertheless, the 0.7 mm PD could withstand the maximum compressive load.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental Digital Radiography; Oral Diagnosis; Protective Devices; Radiation Protection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33411592      PMCID: PMC8404516          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20200339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   3.525


  20 in total

1.  Intraoral radiographic storage phosphor image mean pixel values and signal-to-noise ratio: effects of calibration.

Authors:  Y Hayakawa; A G Farman; M S Kelly; K Kuroyanagi
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1998-11

Review 2.  Work flow with digital intraoral radiography: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ann Wenzel; Anne Møystad
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  Rating the extent of surface scratches on photostimulable storage phosphor plates in a dental school environment.

Authors:  S M Kalathingal; M K Shrout; C Comer; C Brady
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Definition, classification and retrospective analysis of photostimulable phosphor image artefacts and errors in intraoral dental radiography.

Authors:  Armağan Çalışkan; A Pinar Sumer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Comparison of the performance of intraoral X-ray sensors using objective image quality assessment.

Authors:  Kristina Hellén-Halme; Curt Johansson; Mats Nilsson
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2016-02-13

6.  Assessment of intraoral image artifacts related to photostimulable phosphor plates in a dentomaxillofacial radiology department.

Authors:  A Gulsahi; C K Secgin
Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.968

7.  Detection of non-cavitated approximal caries lesions in digital images from seven solid-state receptors with particular focus on task-specific enhancement filters. An ex vivo study in human teeth.

Authors:  Francisco Haiter-Neto; Andrea dos Anjos Pontual; Morten Frydenberg; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Analysis of photostimulable phosphor plate image artifacts in an oral and maxillofacial radiology department.

Authors:  Hui-Lin Chiu; Shui-Hui Lin; Chia-Hui Chen; Wen-Chen Wang; Jin-Yi Chen; Yuk-Kwan Chen; Li-Min Lin
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2008-06-11

9.  Influence of the incorporation of a lead foil to intraoral digital receptors on the image quality and root fracture diagnosis.

Authors:  Amanda Farias Gomes; Yuri Nejaim; Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Deborah Queiroz Freitas
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  The influence of different scan resolutions on the detection of proximal caries lesions.

Authors:  Liana Matos Ferreira; Polyane Mazucatto Queiroz; Gustavo Machado Santaella; Ann Wenzel; Francisco Carlos Groppo; Francisco Haiter-Neto
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2019-06-24
View more
  2 in total

1.  Revisiting dynamic range and image enhancement ability of contemporary digital radiographic systems.

Authors:  Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira; Luciano Augusto Cano Martins; Deborah Queiroz Freitas; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Matheus L Oliveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Effect of enveloping and disinfection methods on artefact formation on enveloped PSP plate images.

Authors:  Umut Pamukcu; Hatice Tetik; Ilkay Peker; Ozge Karadag Atas; Zuhre Zafersoy Akarslan
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 1.882

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.