Literature DB >> 26060066

MR elastography of the liver at 3.0 T in diagnosing liver fibrosis grades; preliminary clinical experience.

Kengo Yoshimitsu1, Toshimichi Mitsufuji2, Yoshinobu Shinagawa2, Ritsuko Fujimitsu2, Ayako Morita2, Hiroshi Urakawa2, Hiroyuki Hayashi3, Koichi Takano2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To clarify the usefulness of 3.0-T MR elastography (MRE) in diagnosing the histological grades of liver fibrosis using preliminary clinical data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2012 and March 2014, MRE was applied to all patients who underwent liver MR study at a 3.0-T clinical unit. Among them, those who had pathological evaluation of liver tissue within 3 months from MR examinations were retrospectively recruited, and the liver stiffness measured by MRE was correlated with histological results. Institutional review board approved this study, waiving informed consent.
RESULTS: There were 70 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Liver stiffness showed significant correlation with the pathological grades of liver fibrosis (rho = 0.89, p < 0.0001, Spearman's rank correlation). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.93, 0.95, 0.99 and 0.95 for fibrosis score greater than or equal to F1, F2, F3 and F4, with cut-off values of 3.13, 3.85, 4.28 and 5.38 kPa, respectively. Multivariate analysis suggested that grades of necroinflammation also affected liver stiffness, but to a significantly lesser degree as compared to fibrosis.
CONCLUSIONS: 3.0-T clinical MRE was suggested to be sufficiently useful in assessing the grades of liver fibrosis. KEY POINTS: MR elastography may help clinicians assess patients with chronic liver diseases. Usefulness of 3.0-T MR elastography has rarely been reported. Measured liver stiffness correlated well with the histological grades of liver fibrosis. Measured liver stiffness was also affected by necroinflammation, but to a lesser degree. 3.0-T MRE could be a non-invasive alternative to liver biopsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3.0 T; Chronic liver disease; Fibrosis; MR elastography; Necroinflammation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26060066     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3863-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  35 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver: preliminary results and estimation of inter-rater reliability.

Authors:  Utaroh Motosugi; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Katsuhiro Sano; Hironobu Sou; Ali Muhi; Tsuyota Koshiishi; Richard L Ehman; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Laurent Huwart; Christine Sempoux; Eric Vicaut; Najat Salameh; Laurence Annet; Etienne Danse; Frank Peeters; Leon C ter Beek; Jacques Rahier; Ralph Sinkus; Yves Horsmans; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of two-dimensional shear wave elastography for the non-invasive staging of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B: a cohort study with internal validation.

Authors:  Jie Zeng; Guang-Jian Liu; Ze-Ping Huang; Jian Zheng; Tao Wu; Rong-Qin Zheng; Ming-De Lu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Measurement consistency of MR elastography at 3.0 T: comparison among three different region-of-interest placement methods.

Authors:  Toshimichi Mitsufuji; Yoshinobu Shinagawa; Ritsuko Fujimitsu; Hiroshi Urakawa; Kimiyo Inoue; Koichi Takano; Kengo Yoshimitsu
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  MR elastography of the liver at 3 T with cine-tagging and bending energy analysis: preliminary results.

Authors:  Haruo Watanabe; Masayuki Kanematsu; Teruhiko Kitagawa; Yuriko Suzuki; Hiroshi Kondo; Satoshi Goshima; Kimihiro Kajita; Kyongtae T Bae; Yoshinobu Hirose; Seiki Miotani; Xiangrong Zhou; Hiroshi Fujita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Short- and midterm repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography in healthy volunteers at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Qiyong Guo; Fei Xia; Jiaxing Sun; Yuying Gao
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography for quantification of hepatic stiffness.

Authors:  Catherine D G Hines; Thorsten A Bley; Mary J Lindstrom; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Diagnosis of cirrhosis by transient elastography (FibroScan): a prospective study.

Authors:  J Foucher; E Chanteloup; J Vergniol; L Castéra; B Le Bail; X Adhoute; J Bertet; P Couzigou; V de Lédinghen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  MR elastography for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection: does histologic necroinflammation influence the measurement of hepatic stiffness?

Authors:  Yu Shi; Qiyong Guo; Fei Xia; Bogdan Dzyubak; Kevin J Glaser; Qiuju Li; Jiahui Li; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Discordance between liver biopsy and Fibroscan® in assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis b: risk factors and influence of necroinflammation.

Authors:  Seung Up Kim; Ja Kyung Kim; Young Nyun Park; Kwang-Hyub Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  23 in total

1.  Hepatic shear wave elastography in children under free-breathing and breath-hold conditions.

Authors:  Caroline Jung; Michael Groth; Kay Uwe Petersen; Anna Hammel; Florian Brinkert; Enke Grabhorn; Sören Alexander Weidemann; Jasmin Busch; Gerhard Adam; Jochen Herrmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Critical comparison of elastography methods to assess chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Thierry Poynard; Laurent Castera
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Technical Failure of MR Elastography Examinations of the Liver: Experience from a Large Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Mathilde Wagner; Idoia Corcuera-Solano; Grace Lo; Steven Esses; Joseph Liao; Cecilia Besa; Nelson Chen; Ginu Abraham; Maggie Fung; James S Babb; Richard L Ehman; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Hepatosplenic volumetric assessment at MDCT for staging liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Kyle Malecki; Oliver F Hunt; Claire Beaumont; John Kloke; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Meghan G Lubner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Comparison of gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Seek Kim; Yu Na Jang; Ji Soo Song
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Effect of breath holding at the end of the inspiration and expiration phases on liver stiffness measured by 2D-MR elastography.

Authors:  Hao Ren; Dawei Yang; Hui Xu; Kai Pang; Yiwen Shi; Qiushuang Guan; Zhenghan Yang
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-01-02

7.  Technical success rates and reliability of spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) MR elastography in patients with chronic liver disease or liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Sang Lim Choi; Eun Sun Lee; Ara Ko; Hyun Jeong Park; Sung Bin Park; Byung Ihn Choi; Young Youn Cho; Stephan Kannengiesser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Thierry Lefebvre; Claire Wartelle-Bladou; Philip Wong; Giada Sebastiani; Jeanne-Marie Giard; Hélène Castel; Jessica Murphy-Lavallée; Damien Olivié; André Ilinca; Marie-Pierre Sylvestre; Guillaume Gilbert; Zu-Hua Gao; Bich N Nguyen; Guy Cloutier; An Tang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Hepatic stiffness measurement by using MR elastography: prognostic values after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Dong Ho Lee; Jeong Min Lee; Nam-Joon Yi; Kwang-Woong Lee; Kyung-Suk Suh; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Kyung Bun Lee; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Comparison of spin-echo echoplanar imaging and gradient recalled echo-based MR elastography at 3 Tesla with and without gadoxetic acid administration.

Authors:  Yong Seek Kim; Ji Soo Song; Stephan Kannengiesser; Seung Young Seo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.