Literature DB >> 31728687

Technical success rates and reliability of spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) MR elastography in patients with chronic liver disease or liver cirrhosis.

Sang Lim Choi1, Eun Sun Lee2, Ara Ko1, Hyun Jeong Park1, Sung Bin Park1, Byung Ihn Choi1, Young Youn Cho3, Stephan Kannengiesser4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the technical success rates of MR elastography (MRE) according to established gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) sequences and to compare liver stiffness (LS) values between the sequences during expiratory and inspiratory phases in patients with chronic liver disease or liver cirrhosis.
METHODS: One hundred and eight patients who underwent MRE were included in this retrospective study. MRE was performed at 3 T based on both sequences during expiration as well as inspiration. Technical failure of MRE was determined if there was no pixel value with a confidence index higher than 95% and/or no apparent shear waves imaged. LS measurements were performed using free-drawing region of interest. To evaluate clinical factors related to the technical success rate of MRE, we assessed etiology of liver disease, ascites, body habitus, iron deposition, and liver morphology of patients. Statistical analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon test, Bland-Altman plot, independent t test, Mann-Whitney test, and McNemar test.
RESULTS: The technical success rate of MRE in SE-EPI was significantly higher than that of GRE (98.1% vs. 80.7%, p < 0.0001). On the basis of univariate analysis, height, weight, and BMI were significantly associated with failure of MRE (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in LS values between GRE and SE-EPI (2.82 kPa vs. 2.92 kPa (p > 0.05)). However, the LS values were significantly higher during inspiration than expiration with both GRE and SE-EPI (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: MRE in SE-EPI during expiratory breath-hold can be used as a reliable examination to evaluate liver fibrosis. KEY POINTS: • The technical success rate of MR elastography in spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) was significantly higher than that in gradient-recalled echo (GRE) during both the inspiratory and expiratory phases. • Liver stiffness values were significantly higher during inspiration than during expiration in both GRE and SE-EPI. • MR elastography in SE-EPI during expiratory breath-hold can be used as a reliable examination in patients with liver fibrosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Echo-planar imaging; Elasticity imaging techniques; Liver cirrhosis; Magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31728687     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06496-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  21 in total

1.  Reliability of liver stiffness measurement in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: the effects of body mass index.

Authors:  S Petta; V Di Marco; C Cammà; G Butera; D Cabibi; A Craxì
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  MR elastography of the liver at 3.0 T in diagnosing liver fibrosis grades; preliminary clinical experience.

Authors:  Kengo Yoshimitsu; Toshimichi Mitsufuji; Yoshinobu Shinagawa; Ritsuko Fujimitsu; Ayako Morita; Hiroshi Urakawa; Hiroyuki Hayashi; Koichi Takano
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Iron Overload in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease.

Authors:  Kris V Kowdley
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2016-11

Review 4.  Comparison of gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Seek Kim; Yu Na Jang; Ji Soo Song
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Feasibility and agreement of stiffness measurements using gradient-echo and spin-echo MR elastography sequences in unselected patients undergoing liver MRI.

Authors:  Guilherme Moura Cunha; Kevin J Glaser; Anke Bergman; Rodrigo P Luz; Eduardo H de Figueiredo; Flavia Paiva Proença Lobo Lopes
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Liver ultrasound elastography: More than staging the disease.

Authors:  George S Gherlan
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-06-28

7.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver: Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Gradient Echo and Spin Echo Echoplanar Imaging Sequences.

Authors:  Mathilde Wagner; Cecilia Besa; Jad Bou Ayache; Temel Kaya Yasar; Octavia Bane; Maggie Fung; Richard L Ehman; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 8.  Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Mathilde Wagner; Laurent Castéra; Cheng William Hong; Curtis L Johnson; Claude B Sirlin; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Spin-echo Echo-planar Imaging MR Elastography versus Gradient-echo MR Elastography for Assessment of Liver Stiffness in Children and Young Adults Suspected of Having Liver Disease.

Authors:  Suraj D Serai; Jonathan R Dillman; Andrew T Trout
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Liver Fibrosis Staging with MR Elastography: Comparison of Diagnostic Performance between Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B and Those with Other Etiologic Causes.

Authors:  Won Chang; Jeong Min Lee; Jeong Hee Yoon; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi; Jung Hwan Yoon; Kyoung Bun Lee; Kwang-Woong Lee; Nam-Joon Yi; Kyung-Suk Suh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver.

Authors:  Jiahui Li; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh; Meng Yin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.266

2.  Quality Control of Magnetic Resonance Elastography Using Percent Measurable Liver Volume Estimation.

Authors:  David H Ballard; Daniel R Ludwig; Tyler J Fraum; Amber Salter; Vamsi R Narra; Anup S Shetty
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 5.119

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver: everything you need to know to get started.

Authors:  Kay M Pepin; Christopher L Welle; Flavius F Guglielmo; Jonathan R Dillman; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-11-01

4.  Diagnostic performance of elastography on liver fibrosis in antiviral treatment-naive chronic hepatitis B patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Mingkai; Wan Sizhe; Wu Xiaoying; Lin Ying; Bin Wu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2022-02-16

5.  Assessment of hepatic fibrosis and inflammation with look-locker T1 mapping and magnetic resonance elastography with histopathology as reference standard.

Authors:  Sophie von Ulmenstein; Sanja Bogdanovic; Hanna Honcharova-Biletska; Sena Blümel; Ansgar R Deibel; Daniel Segna; Christoph Jüngst; Achim Weber; Thomas Kuntzen; Christoph Gubler; Cäcilia S Reiner
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-08-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.