Yong Seek Kim1, Ji Soo Song2,3,4, Stephan Kannengiesser5, Seung Young Seo6,7,8. 1. Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, 20 Geonji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, Chonbuk, 54907, Korea. 2. Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, 20 Geonji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, Chonbuk, 54907, Korea. pichgo@gmail.com. 3. Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University, 20 Geonji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, Chonbuk, 54907, Korea. pichgo@gmail.com. 4. Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, 20 Geonji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, Chonbuk, 54907, Korea. pichgo@gmail.com. 5. MR Applications Development, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany. 6. Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University, 20 Geonji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, Chonbuk, 54907, Korea. 7. Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, 20 Geonji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, Chonbuk, 54907, Korea. 8. Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare spin-echo echoplanar imaging (SE-EPI) and gradient recalled echo (GRE) MR elastography (MRE) at 3 T with and without gadoxetic acid administration. METHODS: We included 84 patients who underwent MRE before and after gadoxetic acid administration, each time using SE-EPI and GRE sequences. Diagnostic performance for predicting clinical liver cirrhosis and high-risk oesophageal varices was assessed using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). The relationships between T2* and success of MRE, and correlations of liver stiffness (LS) values between the two sequences or before and after gadoxetic acid administration, were investigated. RESULTS: SE-EPI-MRE resulted in a significantly lower failure rate than GRE-MRE (1.19% vs. 10.71%, P = 0.018). Increased T2* was related to higher probability of successful LS measurement (odds ratio, 1.426; P = 0.004). The AUC of SE-EPI-MRE was comparable to that of GRE-MRE for the detection of clinical liver cirrhosis (0.938 vs. 0.948, P = 0.235) and high-risk oesophageal varices (0.839 vs. 0.752, P = 0.354). LS values were not significantly different before and after gadoxetic acid administration. CONCLUSION: SE-EPI-MRE can substitute for GRE-MRE for the detection of clinical liver cirrhosis and high-risk oesophageal varices. SE-EPI-MRE is particularly useful in patients with iron deposition, with lower failure rates than GRE-MRE. KEY POINTS: • LS values are comparable between SE-EPI-MRE and GRE-MRE. • Administration of gadoxetic acid does not influence LS measurement. • The failure rate of SE-EPI-MRE is significantly lower than that of GRE-MRE.
OBJECTIVE: To compare spin-echo echoplanar imaging (SE-EPI) and gradient recalled echo (GRE) MR elastography (MRE) at 3 T with and without gadoxetic acid administration. METHODS: We included 84 patients who underwent MRE before and after gadoxetic acid administration, each time using SE-EPI and GRE sequences. Diagnostic performance for predicting clinical liver cirrhosis and high-risk oesophageal varices was assessed using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). The relationships between T2* and success of MRE, and correlations of liver stiffness (LS) values between the two sequences or before and after gadoxetic acid administration, were investigated. RESULTS:SE-EPI-MRE resulted in a significantly lower failure rate than GRE-MRE (1.19% vs. 10.71%, P = 0.018). Increased T2* was related to higher probability of successful LS measurement (odds ratio, 1.426; P = 0.004). The AUC of SE-EPI-MRE was comparable to that of GRE-MRE for the detection of clinical liver cirrhosis (0.938 vs. 0.948, P = 0.235) and high-risk oesophageal varices (0.839 vs. 0.752, P = 0.354). LS values were not significantly different before and after gadoxetic acid administration. CONCLUSION:SE-EPI-MRE can substitute for GRE-MRE for the detection of clinical liver cirrhosis and high-risk oesophageal varices. SE-EPI-MRE is particularly useful in patients with iron deposition, with lower failure rates than GRE-MRE. KEY POINTS: • LS values are comparable between SE-EPI-MRE and GRE-MRE. • Administration of gadoxetic acid does not influence LS measurement. • The failure rate of SE-EPI-MRE is significantly lower than that of GRE-MRE.
Authors: Jurgen H Runge; Anneloes E Bohte; Joanne Verheij; Valeska Terpstra; Aart J Nederveen; Karin M J van Nieuwkerk; Rob J de Knegt; Bert C Baak; Peter L M Jansen; Ralph Sinkus; Jaap Stoker Journal: Abdom Imaging Date: 2014-04
Authors: Temel Kaya Yasar; Mathilde Wagner; Octavia Bane; Cecilia Besa; James S Babb; Stephan Kannengiesser; Maggie Fung; Richard L Ehman; Bachir Taouli Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Meng Yin; Kevin J Glaser; Jayant A Talwalkar; Jun Chen; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Hee Sun Park; Young Jun Kim; Mi Hye Yu; Won Hyeok Choe; Sung Il Jung; Hae Jeong Jeon Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-12-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Laurent Huwart; Najat Salameh; Leon ter Beek; Eric Vicaut; Frank Peeters; Ralph Sinkus; Bernard E Van Beers Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Sang Lim Choi; Eun Sun Lee; Ara Ko; Hyun Jeong Park; Sung Bin Park; Byung Ihn Choi; Young Youn Cho; Stephan Kannengiesser Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Yingzhen N Zhang; Kathryn J Fowler; Arinc Ozturk; Chetan K Potu; Ashley L Louie; Vivian Montes; Walter C Henderson; Kang Wang; Michael P Andre; Anthony E Samir; Claude B Sirlin Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 4.813