Literature DB >> 26044544

A Comparison of Telephone Genetic Counseling and In-Person Genetic Counseling from the Genetic Counselor's Perspective.

Kelly R Burgess1, Erin P Carmany2, Angela M Trepanier3.   

Abstract

Growing demand for and limited geographic access to genetic counseling services is increasing the need for alternative service delivery models (SDM) like telephone genetic counseling (TGC). Little research has been done on genetic counselors' perspectives of the practice of TGC. We created an anonymous online survey to assess whether telephone genetic counselors believed the tasks identified in the ABGC (American Board of Genetic Counseling) Practice Analysis were performed similarly or differently in TGC compared to in person genetic counseling (IPGC). If there were differences noted, we sought to determine the nature of the differences and if additional training might be needed to address them. Eighty eight genetic counselors with experience in TGC completed some or all of the survey. Respondents identified differences in 13 (14.8%) of the 88 tasks studied. The tasks identified as most different in TGC were: "establishing rapport through verbal and nonverbal interactions" (60.2%; 50/83 respondents identified the task as different), "recognizing factors affecting the counseling interaction" (47.8%; 32/67), "assessing client/family emotions, support, etc." (40.1%; 27/66) and "educating clients about basic genetic concepts" (35.6%; 26/73). A slight majority (53.8%; 35/65) felt additional training was needed to communicate information without visual aids and more effectively perform psychosocial assessments. In summary, although a majority of genetic counseling tasks are performed similarly between TGC and IPGC, TGC counselors recognize that specific training in the TGC model may be needed to address the key differences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic counselor tasks; Genetic counselor training; Service delivery models; Telephone genetic counseling

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26044544     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9848-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  23 in total

1.  Errors in delivery of cancer genetics services: implications for practice.

Authors:  Karina L Brierley; Danielle Campfield; Whitney Ducaine; Lindsay Dohany; Talia Donenberg; Kristen Shannon; Robin C Schwartz; Ellen T Matloff
Journal:  Conn Med       Date:  2010-08

2.  Genetic counselor opinions of, and experiences with telephone communication of BRCA1/2 test results.

Authors:  A R Bradbury; L Patrick-Miller; D Fetzer; B Egleston; S A Cummings; A Forman; L Bealin; C Peterson; M Corbman; J O'Connell; M B Daly
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 3.  Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  What's the harm? Genetic counselor perceptions of adverse effects of genetics service provision by non-genetics professionals.

Authors:  Tracy A Bensend; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Kristin B Niendorf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Adverse events in cancer genetic testing: the third case series.

Authors:  Danielle C Bonadies; Karina L Brierley; Rachel E Barnett; Melanie D Baxter; Talia Donenberg; Whitney L Ducaine; Michelle E Ernst; Michelle E Ernstx; Jeanne Homer; Megan Judkins; Niki M Lovick; Jacquelyn M Powers; Christine Stanislaw; Elizabeth Stark; Rio C Stenner; Ellen T Matloff
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

6.  Assessment of the Effectiveness of Genetic Counseling by Telephone Compared to a Clinic Visit.

Authors:  Karan K Sangha; Anita Dircks; Sylvie Langlois
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Expanding access to BRCA1/2 genetic counseling with telephone delivery: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Karin M Butler; Marc D Schwartz; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Kenneth M Boucher; Lisa M Pappas; Amanda Gammon; Wendy Kohlmann; Sandra L Edwards; Antoinette M Stroup; Saundra S Buys; Kristina G Flores; Rebecca A Campo
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Telephone genetic counseling for high-risk women undergoing BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing: rationale and development of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A Demarco; Kristi D Graves; Karen Brown; Rachel H Nusbaum; Diana Moglia; Andrea Forman; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2008-03

10.  Report from the National Society of Genetic Counselors service delivery model task force: a proposal to define models, components, and modes of referral.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen; Shanna L Gustafson; Monica L Marvin; Bronson D Riley; Wendy R Uhlmann; S Bonnie Liebers; Julie A Rousseau
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.537

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Familial/inherited cancer syndrome: a focus on the highly consanguineous Arab population.

Authors:  Fawz S AlHarthi; Alya Qari; Alaa Edress; Malak Abedalthagafi
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 8.617

2.  Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Laurie E Steffen; Barbara H Brumbach; Wendy Kohlmann; Ruofei Du; Ji-Hyun Lee; Amanda Gammon; Karin Butler; Saundra S Buys; Antoinette M Stroup; Rebecca A Campo; Kristina G Flores; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Genetic Counselors' Experiences and Interest in Telegenetics and Remote Counseling.

Authors:  Heather A Zierhut; Ian M MacFarlane; Zahra Ahmed; Jill Davies
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Preferences for in-person disclosure: Patients declining telephone disclosure characteristics and outcomes in the multicenter Communication Of GENetic Test Results by Telephone study.

Authors:  Nina Beri; Linda J Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Michael J Hall; Susan M Domchek; Mary B Daly; Pamela Ganschow; Generosa Grana; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Dominique Fetzer; Amanda Brandt; Rachelle Chambers; Dana F Clark; Andrea Forman; Rikki Gaber; Cassandra Gulden; Janice Horte; Jessica Long; Terra Lucas; Shreshtha Madaan; Kristin Mattie; Danielle McKenna; Susan Montgomery; Sarah Nielsen; Jacquelyn Powers; Kim Rainey; Christina Rybak; Michelle Savage; Christina Seelaus; Jessica Stoll; Jill E Stopfer; Xinxin Shirley Yao; Angela R Bradbury
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone vs In-Person Disclosure of Germline Cancer Genetic Test Results.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda J Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Michael J Hall; Susan M Domchek; Mary B Daly; Pamela Ganschow; Generosa Grana; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Dominique Fetzer; Amanda Brandt; Rachelle Chambers; Dana F Clark; Andrea Forman; Rikki Gaber; Cassandra Gulden; Janice Horte; Jessica M Long; Terra Lucas; Shreshtha Madaan; Kristin Mattie; Danielle McKenna; Susan Montgomery; Sarah Nielsen; Jacquelyn Powers; Kim Rainey; Christina Rybak; Michelle Savage; Christina Seelaus; Jessica Stoll; Jill E Stopfer; Xinxin Shirley Yao
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Patient and genetic counselor perceptions of in-person versus telephone genetic counseling for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Aryana S Jacobs; Marc D Schwartz; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Rachel H Nusbaum; Gillian W Hooker; Tiffani A DeMarco; Jessica E Heinzmann; Wendy McKinnon; Shelley R McCormick; Claire Davis; Andrea D Forman; Alexandra Perez Lebensohn; Emily Dalton; Diana Moglia Tully; Kristi D Graves; Morgan Similuk; Scott Kelly; Beth N Peshkin
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Psychological Impact of Learning CDKN2A Variant Status as a Genetic Research Result.

Authors:  Xuan Zhu; Emma R Leof; Kari G Rabe; Jennifer B McCormick; Gloria M Petersen; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Creation and Implementation of an Environmental Scan to Assess Cancer Genetics Services at Three Oncology Care Settings.

Authors:  Erica M Bednar; Michael T Walsh; Ellen Baker; Kimberly I Muse; Holly D Oakley; Rebekah C Krukenberg; Cara S Dresbold; Sandra B Jenkinson; Amanda L Eppolito; Kelly B Teed; Molly H Klein; Nichole A Morman; Elizabeth C Bowdish; Pauline Russ; Emaline E Wise; Julia N Cooper; Michael W Method; John W Henson; Andrew V Grainger; Banu K Arun; Karen H Lu
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 9.  Alternate Service Delivery Models in Cancer Genetic Counseling: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Adam Hudson Buchanan; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Janet L Williams
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Sudden shift to remote genetic counseling during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences of genetics professionals in Italy.

Authors:  Daniela Turchetti; Linda Battistuzzi; Benedetta Bertonazzi; Lea Godino
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 2.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.