Literature DB >> 21039431

Genetic counselor opinions of, and experiences with telephone communication of BRCA1/2 test results.

A R Bradbury1, L Patrick-Miller, D Fetzer, B Egleston, S A Cummings, A Forman, L Bealin, C Peterson, M Corbman, J O'Connell, M B Daly.   

Abstract

BRCA1/2 test disclosure has, historically, been conducted in-person by genetics professionals. Given increasing demand for, and access to, genetic testing, interest in telephone and Internet genetic services, including disclosure of test results, has increased. Semi-structured interviews with genetic counselors were conducted to determine interest in, and experiences with telephone disclosure of BRCA1/2 test results. Descriptive data are summarized with response proportions. One hundred and ninety-four genetic counselors completed self-administered surveys via the web. Although 98% had provided BRCA1/2 results by telephone, 77% had never provided pre-test counseling by telephone. Genetic counselors reported perceived advantages and disadvantages to telephone disclosure. Thirty-two percent of participants described experiences that made them question this practice. Genetic counselors more frequently reported discomfort with telephone disclosure of a positive result or variant of uncertain significance (p < 0.01) than other results. Overall, 73% of participants reported interest in telephone disclosure. Many genetic counselors have provided telephone disclosure, however, most, infrequently. Genetic counselors identify potential advantages and disadvantages to telephone disclosure, and recognize the potential for testing and patient factors to impact patient outcomes. Further research evaluating the impact of testing and patient factors on cognitive, affective, social and behavioral outcomes of alternative models of communicating genetic information is warranted.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21039431      PMCID: PMC3059740          DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01540.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  34 in total

1.  Establishing a cancer risk evaluation program.

Authors:  K A Calzone; J Stopfer; A Blackwood; B L Weber
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug

2.  Genes on the Web--direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic testing.

Authors:  Adam J Wolfberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Personalized medicine in the era of genomics.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Bruce M Psaty
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Recommendations for Telephone Counseling.

Authors:  K E Ormond; J Haun; L Cook; D Duquette; C Ludowese; A L Matthews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Patient delay in oral cancer: a qualitative study of patients' experiences.

Authors:  S E Scott; E A Grunfeld; J Main; M McGurk
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 6.  Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Broadstock; S Michie; T Marteau
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Proceedings of the international consensus conference on breast cancer risk, genetics, & risk management, April, 2007.

Authors:  Gordon F Schwartz; Kevin S Hughes; Henry T Lynch; Carol J Fabian; Ian S Fentiman; Mark E Robson; Susan M Domchek; Lynn C Hartmann; Roland Holland; David J Winchester
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  B B Biesecker; M Boehnke; K Calzone; D S Markel; J E Garber; F S Collins; B L Weber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  "Obesity" and "Clinical Obesity" Men's understandings of obesity and its relation to the risk of diabetes: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Nicola F Weaver; Louise Hayes; Nigel C Unwin; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  21 in total

1.  Predictive Genetic Testing and Alternatives to Face to Face Results Disclosure: A Retrospective Review of Patients Preference for Alternative Modes of BRCA 1 and 2 Results Disclosure in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  Rosie O'Shea; Marie Meany; Cliona Carroll; Nuala Cody; David Healy; Andrew Green; Sally Ann Lynch
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A Comparison of Telephone Genetic Counseling and In-Person Genetic Counseling from the Genetic Counselor's Perspective.

Authors:  Kelly R Burgess; Erin P Carmany; Angela M Trepanier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Telemedicine uptake among Genetics Professionals in Europe: room for expansion.

Authors:  Ellen Otten; Erwin Birnie; Anneke M Lucassen; Adelita V Ranchor; Irene M Van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Beth N Peshkin; Jeanne Mandelblatt; Rachel Nusbaum; An-Tsun Huang; Yaojen Chang; Kristi Graves; Claudine Isaacs; Marie Wood; Wendy McKinnon; Judy Garber; Shelley McCormick; Anita Y Kinney; George Luta; Sarah Kelleher; Kara-Grace Leventhal; Patti Vegella; Angie Tong; Lesley King
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Telegenetics: an Update on Availability and Use of Telemedicine in Clinical Genetics Service.

Authors:  Irena Vrečar; Dimitar Hristovski; Borut Peterlin
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone vs In-Person Disclosure of Germline Cancer Genetic Test Results.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda J Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Michael J Hall; Susan M Domchek; Mary B Daly; Pamela Ganschow; Generosa Grana; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Dominique Fetzer; Amanda Brandt; Rachelle Chambers; Dana F Clark; Andrea Forman; Rikki Gaber; Cassandra Gulden; Janice Horte; Jessica M Long; Terra Lucas; Shreshtha Madaan; Kristin Mattie; Danielle McKenna; Susan Montgomery; Sarah Nielsen; Jacquelyn Powers; Kim Rainey; Christina Rybak; Michelle Savage; Christina Seelaus; Jessica Stoll; Jill E Stopfer; Xinxin Shirley Yao
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Genetic counselors' (GC) knowledge, awareness, understanding of clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) genomic testing.

Authors:  P M Boland; K Ruth; J M Matro; K L Rainey; C Y Fang; Y N Wong; M B Daly; M J Hall
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  Implementation and outcomes of telephone disclosure of clinical BRCA1/2 test results.

Authors:  Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Mary Daly; Evelyn Stevens; Dominique Fetzer; Andrea Forman; Lisa Bealin; Christina Rybak; Candace Peterson; Melanie Corbman; Angela R Bradbury
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-08-19

9.  Patient and genetic counselor perceptions of in-person versus telephone genetic counseling for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Aryana S Jacobs; Marc D Schwartz; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Rachel H Nusbaum; Gillian W Hooker; Tiffani A DeMarco; Jessica E Heinzmann; Wendy McKinnon; Shelley R McCormick; Claire Davis; Andrea D Forman; Alexandra Perez Lebensohn; Emily Dalton; Diana Moglia Tully; Kristi D Graves; Morgan Similuk; Scott Kelly; Beth N Peshkin
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Identification of genetic counseling service delivery models in practice: a report from the NSGC Service Delivery Model Task Force.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen; Monica L Marvin; Bronson D Riley; Hetal S Vig; Julie A Rousseau; Shanna L Gustafson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.