Literature DB >> 29770910

Creation and Implementation of an Environmental Scan to Assess Cancer Genetics Services at Three Oncology Care Settings.

Erica M Bednar1,2, Michael T Walsh3, Ellen Baker3, Kimberly I Muse4, Holly D Oakley4, Rebekah C Krukenberg5, Cara S Dresbold5, Sandra B Jenkinson5, Amanda L Eppolito6, Kelly B Teed6, Molly H Klein6, Nichole A Morman7, Elizabeth C Bowdish7, Pauline Russ7, Emaline E Wise7, Julia N Cooper7, Michael W Method8, John W Henson6, Andrew V Grainger9, Banu K Arun10, Karen H Lu11.   

Abstract

An environmental scan (ES) is an efficient mixed-methods approach to collect and interpret relevant data for strategic planning and project design. To date, the ES has not been used nor evaluated in the clinical cancer genetics setting. We created and implemented an ES to inform the design of a quality improvement (QI) project to increase the rates of adherence to national guidelines for cancer genetic counseling and genetic testing at three unique oncology care settings (OCS). The ES collected qualitative and quantitative data from reviews of internal processes, past QI efforts, the literature, and each OCS. The ES used a data collection form and semi-structured interviews to aid in data collection. The ES was completed within 6 months, and sufficient data were captured to identify opportunities and threats to the QI project's success, as well as potential barriers to, and facilitators of guideline-based cancer genetics services at each OCS. Previously unreported barriers were identified, including inefficient genetic counseling appointment scheduling processes and the inability to track referrals, genetics appointments, and genetic test results within electronic medical record systems. The ES was a valuable process for QI project planning at three OCS and may be used to evaluate genetics services in other settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer genetics; Environmental scan; Genetic counseling; Genetic testing; Health systems; Hereditary cancer; Quality improvement

Year:  2018        PMID: 29770910      PMCID: PMC6240000          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0262-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  49 in total

1.  Underuse of BRCA testing in patients with breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Ling Chen; Ana I Tergas; Melissa Accordino; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  The utility of the environmental scan for public health practice: lessons from an urban program to increase cancer screening.

Authors:  Randolph Rowel; Natalie Dewberry Moore; Sia Nowrojee; Peter Memiah; Yvonne Bronner
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Referral and experience with genetic testing among women with early onset breast cancer.

Authors:  Karen L Brown; Robin Hutchison; Randi E Zinberg; Margaret M McGovern
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2005

4.  A Comparison of Telephone Genetic Counseling and In-Person Genetic Counseling from the Genetic Counselor's Perspective.

Authors:  Kelly R Burgess; Erin P Carmany; Angela M Trepanier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  BRCA testing within the Department of Veterans Affairs: concordance with clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Danielle S Chun; Brygida Berse; Vickie L Venne; Scott L DuVall; Kelly K Filipski; Michael J Kelley; Laurence J Meyer; Michael S Icardi; Julie A Lynch
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Expanding access to BRCA1/2 genetic counseling with telephone delivery: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Karin M Butler; Marc D Schwartz; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Kenneth M Boucher; Lisa M Pappas; Amanda Gammon; Wendy Kohlmann; Sandra L Edwards; Antoinette M Stroup; Saundra S Buys; Kristina G Flores; Rebecca A Campo
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Population-Based Lynch Syndrome Screening by Microsatellite Instability in Patients ≤50: Prevalence, Testing Determinants, and Result Availability Prior to Colon Surgery.

Authors:  Jordan J Karlitz; Mei-Chin Hsieh; Yong Liu; Christine Blanton; Beth Schmidt; J Milburn Jessup; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Vivien W Chen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Pre-test genetic counseling services for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer delivered by non-genetics professionals in the state of Florida.

Authors:  S T Vadaparampil; C L Scherr; D Cragun; T L Malo; T Pal
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 9.  A systematic review of factors that act as barriers to patient referral to genetic services.

Authors:  Türem Delikurt; Graham R Williamson; Violetta Anastasiadou; Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  A practice guideline from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors: referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment.

Authors:  Heather Hampel; Robin L Bennett; Adam Buchanan; Rachel Pearlman; Georgia L Wiesner
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  7 in total

1.  Disseminating universal genetic testing to a diverse, indigent patient population at a county hospital gynecologic oncology clinic.

Authors:  Erica M Bednar; Charlotte C Sun; Bethsaida Camacho; John Terrell; Alyssa G Rieber; Lois M Ramondetta; Ralph S Freedman; Karen H Lu
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  An Environmental Scan of Biopsychosocial and Clinical Variables in Cohort Studies of Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Brittany M Bernardo; Joanne W Elena; Paige A Green; Elise Hoover; Juan Peng; Garnet L Anderson; Bette Caan; Lisa G Johnson; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Impact of neurofibromatosis type 1 in an adult community population.

Authors:  Timothy A Gregory; Peter Simon B Molina; Gregory D Phillips; John W Henson
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2022-02-17

4.  Organizational supports for knowledge translation in paediatric health centres and research institutes: insights from a Canadian environmental scan.

Authors:  Stephanie Miranda Nadine Glegg; Andrea Ryce; Kimberly J Miller; Laura Nimmon; Anita Kothari; Liisa Holsti
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-05-13

Review 5.  Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review.

Authors:  Patricia Charlton; Terri Kean; Rebecca H Liu; Daniel A Nagel; Rima Azar; Shelley Doucet; Alison Luke; William Montelpare; Kim Mears; Leah Boulos
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  The use of the environmental scan in health services delivery research: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Patricia Charlton; Shelley Doucet; Rima Azar; Daniel A Nagel; Leah Boulos; Alison Luke; Kim Mears; Katherine J Kelly; William J Montelpare
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Service delivery models for injectable opioid agonist treatment in Canada: 2 sequential environmental scans.

Authors:  Erin Eydt; Stephanie Glegg; Christy Sutherland; Karine Meador; Michael Trew; Michel Perreault; Marie-Ève Goyer; Bernard Le Foll; Jeffrey Turnbull; Nadia Fairbairn
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2021-02-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.