Literature DB >> 26140847

Assessment of the Effectiveness of Genetic Counseling by Telephone Compared to a Clinic Visit.

Karan K Sangha1, Anita Dircks, Sylvie Langlois.   

Abstract

Maternal serum screening, also known as the triple screen, is used during pregnancy to assess the risk of carrying a fetus with specific chromosome abnormalities or open spina bifida. All women in British Columbia who screen positive are eligible for genetic counseling and are offered amniocentesis. The purpose of this study is to determine what differences (if any) exist in patients' understanding and/or anxiety when genetic counseling for a positive triple screen is conducted in person versus over the telephone. Each patient who participated was given the choice of having genetic counseling in person or over the telephone, this after a randomized design failed to elicit any participants. Using a written postcounseling questionnaire, each patient was assessed for her understanding of the information presented in the session, and her anxiety regarding her risk. In this small pilot study, no large differences were detected in patients' understanding or anxiety when genetic counseling was conducted by telephone versus in person.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 26140847     DOI: 10.1023/A:1022663324006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  21 in total

Review 1.  Using the telephone to improve health behavior and health service delivery.

Authors:  C M McBride; B K Rimer
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1999-05

Review 2.  You've got a lot to answer for, Mr Bell. A review of the use of the telephone in primary care.

Authors:  L Hallam
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 3.  The telephone as a communication medium for health education.

Authors:  J E Soet; C E Basch
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  1997-12

Review 4.  Towards informed decisions about prenatal testing: a review.

Authors:  T M Marteau
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Recommendations for Telephone Counseling.

Authors:  K E Ormond; J Haun; L Cook; D Duquette; C Ludowese; A L Matthews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  The evolution and effectiveness of telephone counseling services.

Authors:  A R Hornblow
Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry       Date:  1986-07

7.  Telephone vs. face-to-face notification of HIV results in high-risk youth.

Authors:  Rachel C Tsu; Michael L Burm; Jennifer A Gilhooly; C Wayne Sells
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  Visualism in community nursing: implications for telephone work with service users.

Authors:  K Wilson; A Williams
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2000-07

9.  Coping with serum screening for Down syndrome when the results is given as a numeric value.

Authors:  D Quagliarini; S Betti; B Brambati; U Nicolini
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress.

Authors:  M Horowitz; N Wilner; W Alvarez
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.312

View more
  16 in total

1.  The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Evaluation of telephone genetic counselling to facilitate germline BRCA1/2 testing in women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Erin Tutty; Lara Petelin; Joanne McKinley; Mary-Anne Young; Bettina Meiser; Victoria M Rasmussen; Rowan Forbes Shepherd; Paul A James; Laura E Forrest
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Genetic counselor opinions of, and experiences with telephone communication of BRCA1/2 test results.

Authors:  A R Bradbury; L Patrick-Miller; D Fetzer; B Egleston; S A Cummings; A Forman; L Bealin; C Peterson; M Corbman; J O'Connell; M B Daly
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Predictive Genetic Testing and Alternatives to Face to Face Results Disclosure: A Retrospective Review of Patients Preference for Alternative Modes of BRCA 1 and 2 Results Disclosure in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  Rosie O'Shea; Marie Meany; Cliona Carroll; Nuala Cody; David Healy; Andrew Green; Sally Ann Lynch
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Retrospective comparison of patient outcomes after in-person and telephone results disclosure counseling for BRCA1/2 genetic testing.

Authors:  Courtney Doughty Rice; Jennifer Gamm Ruschman; Lisa J Martin; Jennifer B Manders; Erin Miller
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  A Comparison of Telephone Genetic Counseling and In-Person Genetic Counseling from the Genetic Counselor's Perspective.

Authors:  Kelly R Burgess; Erin P Carmany; Angela M Trepanier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  The Alpha-1 Association Genetic Counseling Program: an innovative approach to service.

Authors:  Dawn McGee; Charlie Strange; Rebecca McClure; Laura Schwarz; Marlene Erven
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  A comparison of patient satisfaction with telehealth and on-site consultations: a pilot study for prenatal genetic counseling.

Authors:  Debra J Abrams; Mark R Geier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S B Haga; W T Barry; R Mills; L Svetkey; S Suchindran; H F Willard; G S Ginsburg
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Delivering information about cancer genetics via letter to patients at low and moderate risk of familial cancer: a pilot study in Wales.

Authors:  C Phelps; K Platt; L France; J Gray; R Iredale
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.