Literature DB >> 22566244

Report from the National Society of Genetic Counselors service delivery model task force: a proposal to define models, components, and modes of referral.

Stephanie A Cohen1, Shanna L Gustafson, Monica L Marvin, Bronson D Riley, Wendy R Uhlmann, S Bonnie Liebers, Julie A Rousseau.   

Abstract

The Service Delivery Model Task Force (SDMTF) was appointed in 2009 by the leadership of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) with a charge to research and assess the capacity of all existing service delivery models to improve access to genetic counseling services in the context of increasing demand for genetic testing and counseling. In approaching this charge, the SDMTF found that there were varying interpretations of what was meant by "service delivery models" and the group held extensive discussions about current practices to arrive at consensus of proposed definitions for current genetic service delivery models, modes of referral and components of service delivery. The major goal of these proposed definitions is to allow for conversations to begin to address the charge to the committee. We propose that current models of service delivery can be defined by: 1) the methods in which genetic counseling services are delivered (In-person, Telephone, Group and Telegenetics), 2) the way they are accessed by patients (Traditional referral, Tandem, Triage, Rescue and Self-referral) and 3) the variable components that depend upon multiple factors unique to each service setting. This report by the SDMTF provides a starting point whereby standardized terminology can be used in future studies that assess the effectiveness of these described models to overcome barriers to access to genetic counseling services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22566244     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9505-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  26 in total

1.  Group counseling for couples who have terminated a pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  A Heimler
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1990

2.  Genetic counselor opinions of, and experiences with telephone communication of BRCA1/2 test results.

Authors:  A R Bradbury; L Patrick-Miller; D Fetzer; B Egleston; S A Cummings; A Forman; L Bealin; C Peterson; M Corbman; J O'Connell; M B Daly
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Delivery of Internet-based cancer genetic counselling services to patients' homes: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Neal J Meropol; Mary B Daly; Hetal S Vig; Frank J Manion; Sharon L Manne; Carla Mazar; Camara Murphy; Nicholas Solarino; Vadim Zubarev
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 6.184

4.  Assessment of clinical practices among cancer genetic counselors.

Authors:  Deborah Wham; Thuy Vu; Gayun Chan-Smutko; Christine Kobelka; Diana Urbauer; Brandie Heald
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Real world experience with cancer genetic counseling via telephone.

Authors:  Rebecca Sutphen; Barbara Davila; Heather Shappell; Tricia Holtje; Susan Vadaparampil; Sue Friedman; Michele Toscano; Joanne Armstrong
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  A grand challenge: providing benefits of clinical genetics to those in need.

Authors:  Alice K Hawkins; Michael R Hayden
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Randomized comparison of phone versus in-person BRCA1/2 predisposition genetic test result disclosure counseling.

Authors:  Jean Jenkins; Kathleen A Calzone; Eileen Dimond; David J Liewehr; Seth M Steinberg; Oxana Jourkiv; Pam Klein; Peter W Soballe; Sheila A Prindiville; Ilan R Kirsch
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Evaluation of group genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yolanda Ridge; Karen Panabaker; Mary McCullum; Cheryl Portigal-Todd; Jenna Scott; Barbara McGillivray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Telephone genetic counseling for high-risk women undergoing BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing: rationale and development of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Tiffani A Demarco; Kristi D Graves; Karen Brown; Rachel H Nusbaum; Diana Moglia; Andrea Forman; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2008-03

10.  The effects of prenatal group genetic counselling on knowledge, anxiety and decisional conflict: issues for nuchal translucency screening.

Authors:  Amy S Kaiser; Lorraine E Ferris; Anne L Pastuszak; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Jo-Ann Johnson; Susan Conacher; B F Shaw
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.246

View more
  30 in total

1.  Effects of a genetic counseling model on mothers of children with down syndrome: a Brazilian pilot study.

Authors:  Marcos Ricardo Datti Micheletto; Nelson Iguimar Valerio; Agnes Cristina Fett-Conte
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A Comparison of Telephone Genetic Counseling and In-Person Genetic Counseling from the Genetic Counselor's Perspective.

Authors:  Kelly R Burgess; Erin P Carmany; Angela M Trepanier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Development of genetic counseling services in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shu Chien; Pen-Hua Su; Suh-Jen Chen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Acceptability of telemedicine and other cancer genetic counseling models of service delivery in geographically remote settings.

Authors:  Eileen McDonald; Amanda Lamb; Barbara Grillo; Lee Lucas; Susan Miesfeldt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Exploring barriers to payer utilization of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Nan Doyle; Allison Cirino; Amber Trivedi; Maureen Flynn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  A prospective cohort study assessing clinical referral management & workforce allocation within a UK regional medical genetics service.

Authors:  Caroline Benjamin; Catherine Houghton; Claire Foo; Chris Edgar; Gail Mannion; Jan Birch; Ian Ellis; Astrid Weber
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Telegenetics: an Update on Availability and Use of Telemedicine in Clinical Genetics Service.

Authors:  Irena Vrečar; Dimitar Hristovski; Borut Peterlin
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Implementing a Virtual Health Telemedicine Program in a Community Setting.

Authors:  Scott M Weissman; Kate Zellmer; Nicole Gill; Deborah Wham
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 9.  Genetic susceptibility testing for neurodegenerative diseases: ethical and practice issues.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Wendy R Uhlmann
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Identification of genetic counseling service delivery models in practice: a report from the NSGC Service Delivery Model Task Force.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen; Monica L Marvin; Bronson D Riley; Hetal S Vig; Julie A Rousseau; Shanna L Gustafson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.