Literature DB >> 23754506

What's the harm? Genetic counselor perceptions of adverse effects of genetics service provision by non-genetics professionals.

Tracy A Bensend1, Patricia McCarthy Veach, Kristin B Niendorf.   

Abstract

Anecdotal accounts suggest some patients have experienced negative outcomes as a result of receiving genetics services from non-genetics providers, but empirical evidence of these incidents and their outcomes is limited. This study examined genetic counselors' perceptions of the occurrence of such incidents in the state of Minnesota. Twenty-five genetic counselors completed an on-line survey and 20 also participated in a semi-structured telephone interview. The interviewees recalled and described 37 specific incidents they perceived as having negative outcomes for patients and/or their families. Inductive and cross-case analysis revealed common themes including: adverse psychosocial effects, inadequate genetic counseling, genetic testing and screening errors, medical mismanagement, negative shifts in attitudes toward medical providers, and unnecessary use of health care resources. Commonly mentioned strategies for preventing/mitigating negative outcomes included: educational outreach and awareness programs for medical providers and the general public, standardized testing and screening processes, and implementing mechanisms for reporting and addressing adverse events. Additional findings, practice and policy implications, and research recommendations are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23754506     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9605-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  22 in total

1.  Errors in delivery of cancer genetics services: implications for practice.

Authors:  Karina L Brierley; Danielle Campfield; Whitney Ducaine; Lindsay Dohany; Talia Donenberg; Kristen Shannon; Robin C Schwartz; Ellen T Matloff
Journal:  Conn Med       Date:  2010-08

2.  Current surgical practice in screening for colorectal cancer based on family history criteria.

Authors:  J H Scholefield; A G Johnson; A J Shorthouse
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer genetics knowledge in a national sample of US physicians.

Authors:  L Wideroff; S T Vadaparampil; M H Greene; S Taplin; L Olson; A N Freedman
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Communication of genetic information by other health professionals: the role of the genetic counsellor in specialist clinics.

Authors:  Rosie O'Shea; Anne Marie Murphy; Eileen Treacy; Sally Ann Lynch; Kathryn Thirlaway; Debby Lambert
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Underdiagnosis of Lynch syndrome involves more than family history criteria.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Rachel Schiesser; Gobind Anand; Peter A Richardson; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Empowering primary care health professionals in medical genetics: how soon? How fast? How far?

Authors:  K Greendale; R E Pyeritz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001

7.  Interviews with primary care physicians regarding taking and interpreting the cancer family history.

Authors:  Marie E Wood; Alan Stockdale; Brian S Flynn
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  The effect of BRCA gene testing on family relationships: A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews.

Authors:  Heather A Douglas; Rebekah J Hamilton; Robin E Grubs
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Primary care physicians' utilization and perceptions of genetics services.

Authors:  S J Hayflick; M P Eiff; L Carpenter; J Steinberger
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem.

Authors:  Marieke J H Baars; Lidewij Henneman; Leo P Ten Kate
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  36 in total

1.  Genetic counselors' experience with cell-free fetal DNA testing as a prenatal screening option for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Julie M H Horsting; Stephen R Dlouhy; Katelyn Hanson; Kimberly Quaid; Shaochun Bai; Karrie A Hines
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Genetic counselors' practices and confidence regarding variant of uncertain significance results and reclassification from BRCA testing.

Authors:  C L Scherr; N M Lindor; T L Malo; F J Couch; S T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Risk for Patient Harm in Canadian Genetic Counseling Practice: It's Time to Consider Regulation.

Authors:  Andrea L Shugar; Nada Quercia; Christopher Trevors; Marina M Rabideau; Sohnee Ahmed
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  A Comparison of Telephone Genetic Counseling and In-Person Genetic Counseling from the Genetic Counselor's Perspective.

Authors:  Kelly R Burgess; Erin P Carmany; Angela M Trepanier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Ethical and Professional Challenges Encountered by Laboratory Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Daniel Groepper; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Bonnie S LeRoy; Matthew Bower
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: UK genetic counselors' experiences and perspectives.

Authors:  Elizabeth Alexander; Susan Kelly; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Online genetic counseling from the providers' perspective: counselors' evaluations and a time and cost analysis.

Authors:  Ellen Otten; Erwin Birnie; Adelita V Ranchor; Irene M van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Physicians' Awareness and Utilization of Genetic Services in Texas.

Authors:  Callie Diamonstein; Blair Stevens; S Shahrukh Hashmi; Jerrie Refuerzo; Cathy Sullivan; Jennifer Hoskovec
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  A randomized noninferiority trial of condensed protocols for genetic risk disclosure of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Kurt D Christensen; L Adrienne Cupples; Norman R Relkin; Peter J Whitehouse; Charmaine D M Royal; Thomas O Obisesan; Robert Cook-Deegan; Erin Linnenbringer; Melissa Barber Butson; Grace-Ann Fasaye; Elana Levinson; J Scott Roberts
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 21.566

10.  Public trust in genomic risk assessment for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Rachel Mills; William Barry; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.