Literature DB >> 29362948

Genetic Counselors' Experiences and Interest in Telegenetics and Remote Counseling.

Heather A Zierhut1, Ian M MacFarlane2, Zahra Ahmed3, Jill Davies4.   

Abstract

In 2009, the National Society of Genetic Counselors Service (NSGC) Delivery Model Task Force defined genetic counseling service delivery models including telephone (genetic counseling provided remotely by telephone) and telegenetics (counseling provided remotely using videoconferencing). Little is known about the experience of genetic counselors practicing telemedicine in the USA. We sought to evaluate perceived satisfaction, advantages, disadvantages, and barriers to the practice and implementation of telegenetics by practicing genetic counselors. A 21-question online survey was distributed via the NSGC's member directory. Descriptive statistics and a thematic analysis were used to analyze data. A total of 344 surveys were completed of which 235 (68.3%) respondents had delivered genetic counseling via telemedicine and 109 (36.6%) had not. Overall genetic counseling providers who had provided telegenetics were satisfied or very satisfied with their position (91%) and those who were not performing telegenetics were at least slightly interested in a telehealth position (92%).The most common appealing reasons for working in or wanting to work in telemedicine included an innovative approach to healthcare delivery, aspects of remote positions such as the ability to work from home, and flexibility of hours. Unappealing characteristics of telemedicine included the inability to see nonverbals, limited psychosocial counseling, and limited social interaction with colleague that is associated with remote positions. Barriers to implementation of telegenetics were noted by 53% of respondents with the largest barrier being billing and reimbursement. The results of this work suggest that telegenetics service organizations could consider increasing social interactions, attempting to use the preferred method of care (video) to increase ability to see nonverbals, offering flexible work hours, and allowing time to address psychosocial issues as they arise in consultations.

Keywords:  Alternative service delivery models; Genetic counseling; Telegenetics; Telehealth; Telemedicine; Telephone counseling

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29362948     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0200-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  27 in total

1.  Randomized Trial of Telegenetics vs. In-Person Cancer Genetic Counseling: Cost, Patient Satisfaction and Attendance.

Authors:  Adam H Buchanan; Santanu K Datta; Celette Sugg Skinner; Gail P Hollowell; Henry F Beresford; Thomas Freeland; Benjamin Rogers; John Boling; P Kelly Marcom; Martha B Adams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Perspectives from the Veterans Health Administration about opportunities and barriers in telemedicine.

Authors:  Faith Hopp; Pamela Whitten; Usha Subramanian; Peter Woodbridge; Michael Mackert; Julie Lowery
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.184

3.  Delivery of Internet-based cancer genetic counselling services to patients' homes: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Neal J Meropol; Mary B Daly; Hetal S Vig; Frank J Manion; Sharon L Manne; Carla Mazar; Camara Murphy; Nicholas Solarino; Vadim Zubarev
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 6.184

4.  Recommendations for Telephone Counseling.

Authors:  K E Ormond; J Haun; L Cook; D Duquette; C Ludowese; A L Matthews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Telegenetics in Maine: Successful clinical and educational service delivery model developed from a 3-year pilot project.

Authors:  Dale Halsey Lea; Judith L Johnson; Sara Ellingwood; Walter Allan; Arvind Patel; Rosemarie Smith
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  A comparison of patient satisfaction with telehealth and on-site consultations: a pilot study for prenatal genetic counseling.

Authors:  Debra J Abrams; Mark R Geier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Online genetic counseling from the providers' perspective: counselors' evaluations and a time and cost analysis.

Authors:  Ellen Otten; Erwin Birnie; Adelita V Ranchor; Irene M van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 8.  The socio-economic impact of telehealth: a systematic review.

Authors:  P A Jennett; L Affleck Hall; D Hailey; A Ohinmaa; C Anderson; R Thomas; B Young; D Lorenzetti; R E Scott
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.184

9.  Report from the National Society of Genetic Counselors service delivery model task force: a proposal to define models, components, and modes of referral.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen; Shanna L Gustafson; Monica L Marvin; Bronson D Riley; Wendy R Uhlmann; S Bonnie Liebers; Julie A Rousseau
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  A novel approach in pediatric telegenetic services: geneticist, pediatrician and genetic counselor team.

Authors:  Shobana Kubendran; Siddharthan Sivamurthy; Gerald Bradley Schaefer
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  14 in total

1.  Introduction to the "Technology in Practice" Special Issue.

Authors:  Vickie Venne; Megan Doerr
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Genetics of dilated cardiomyopathy: practical implications for heart failure management.

Authors:  Andrew N Rosenbaum; Katherine E Agre; Naveen L Pereira
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  A pilot eConsultation service in Eastern Ontario: bridging clinical genetics and primary care.

Authors:  Priya T Bhola; Clare Liddy; Amir Afkham; Erin Keely; Gail E Graham
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Where is genetic medicine headed? Exploring the perspectives of Canadian genetic professionals on future trends using the Delphi method.

Authors:  Kennedy Borle; Nicola Kopac; Nick Dragojlovic; Elisabet Rodriguez Llorian; Jan M Friedman; Alison M Elliott; Larry D Lynd
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 5.351

Review 5.  The composition and capacity of the clinical genetics workforce in high-income countries: a scoping review.

Authors:  Nick Dragojlovic; Kennedy Borle; Nicola Kopac; Ursula Ellis; Patricia Birch; Shelin Adam; Jan M Friedman; Amy Nisselle; Alison M Elliott; Larry D Lynd
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Access to Genetic Counselors in the Southern United States.

Authors:  Catalina Villegas; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2019-07-01

Review 7.  Challenges of Genomic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancers.

Authors:  Lindsey McAlarnen; Kristen Stearns; Denise Uyar
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2021-01-14

8.  Videoconferencing to deliver genetics services: a systematic review of telegenetics in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Brown; Isabella Watts; Emily R Beales; Ashwini Maudhoo; Judith Hayward; Eamonn Sheridan; Imran Rafi
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Sudden shift to remote genetic counseling during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences of genetics professionals in Italy.

Authors:  Daniela Turchetti; Linda Battistuzzi; Benedetta Bertonazzi; Lea Godino
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 2.717

10.  Utilization of health information technology among cancer genetic counselors.

Authors:  Jordon B Ritchie; Caitlin G Allen; Heath Morrison; Michelle Nichols; Steven D Lauzon; Joshua D Schiffman; Chanita Hughes Halbert; Brandon M Welch
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.