Literature DB >> 26040508

Optimized protocols for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with thoracic metallic implants.

Laura J Olivieri1, Russell R Cross, Kendall E O'Brien, Kanishka Ratnayaka, Michael S Hansen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a valuable tool in congenital heart disease; however patients frequently have metal devices in the chest from the treatment of their disease that complicate imaging. Methods are needed to improve imaging around metal implants near the heart. Basic sequence parameter manipulations have the potential to minimize artifact while limiting effects on image resolution and quality.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to design cine and static cardiac imaging sequences to minimize metal artifact while maintaining image quality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using systematic variation of standard imaging parameters on a fluid-filled phantom containing commonly used metal cardiac devices, we developed optimized sequences for steady-state free precession (SSFP), gradient recalled echo (GRE) cine imaging, and turbo spin-echo (TSE) black-blood imaging. We imaged 17 consecutive patients undergoing routine cardiac MR with 25 metal implants of various origins using both standard and optimized imaging protocols for a given slice position. We rated images for quality and metal artifact size by measuring metal artifact in two orthogonal planes within the image.
RESULTS: All metal artifacts were reduced with optimized imaging. The average metal artifact reduction for the optimized SSFP cine was 1.5+/-1.8 mm, and for the optimized GRE cine the reduction was 4.6+/-4.5 mm (P < 0.05). Quality ratings favored the optimized GRE cine. Similarly, the average metal artifact reduction for the optimized TSE images was 1.6+/-1.7 mm (P < 0.05), and quality ratings favored the optimized TSE imaging.
CONCLUSION: Imaging sequences tailored to minimize metal artifact are easily created by modifying basic sequence parameters, and images are superior to standard imaging sequences in both quality and artifact size. Specifically, for optimized cine imaging a GRE sequence should be used with settings that favor short echo time, i.e. flow compensation off, weak asymmetrical echo and a relatively high receiver bandwidth. For static black-blood imaging, a TSE sequence should be used with fat saturation turned off and high receiver bandwidth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26040508     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-015-3366-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  18 in total

1.  Prosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings: assessment of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  F G Shellock
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging near metal implants.

Authors:  K M Koch; B A Hargreaves; K Butts Pauly; W Chen; G E Gold; K F King
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Artifact-free coronary magnetic resonance angiography and coronary vessel wall imaging in the presence of a new, metallic, coronary magnetic resonance imaging stent.

Authors:  Elmar Spuentrup; Alexander Ruebben; Andreas Mahnken; Matthias Stuber; Christian Kölker; Trung Hieu Nguyen; Rolf W Günther; Arno Buecker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Cardiovascular catheters and accessories: ex vivo testing of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts associated with MRI.

Authors:  F G Shellock; V J Shellock
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Indications for cardiac catheterization and intervention in pediatric cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Timothy F Feltes; Emile Bacha; Robert H Beekman; John P Cheatham; Jeffrey A Feinstein; Antoinette S Gomes; Ziyad M Hijazi; Frank F Ing; Michael de Moor; W Robert Morrow; Charles E Mullins; Kathryn A Taubert; Evan M Zahn
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls.

Authors:  E M Delfaut; J Beltran; G Johnson; J Rousseau; X Marchandise; A Cotten
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Glenn N Levine; Antoinette S Gomes; Andrew E Arai; David A Bluemke; Scott D Flamm; Emanuel Kanal; Warren J Manning; Edward T Martin; J Michael Smith; Norbert Wilke; Frank S Shellock
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Comparative MRI compatibility of 316 L stainless steel alloy and nickel-titanium alloy stents.

Authors:  Andrea Holton; Edward Walsh; Andreas Anayiotos; Gerald Pohost; Ramakrishna Venugopalan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children and adults with congenital heart disease: SCMR expert consensus group on congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Sohrab Fratz; Taylor Chung; Gerald F Greil; Margaret M Samyn; Andrew M Taylor; Emanuela R Valsangiacomo Buechel; Shi-Joon Yoo; Andrew J Powell
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Pediatric cardiovascular interventional devices: effect on CMR images at 1.5 and 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Sarah N Khan; Stanislas Rapacchi; Daniel S Levi; J Paul Finn
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  5 in total

1.  An eight-year prospective controlled study about the safety and diagnostic value of cardiac and non-cardiac 1.5-T MRI in patients with a conventional pacemaker or a conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Lupo; Riccardo Cappato; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Secchi; Giacomo D E Papini; Sara Foresti; Hussam Ali; Guido M G De Ambroggi; Antonio Sorgente; Gianluca Epicoco; Paola M Cannaò; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Update on the Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Prabhakar Rajiah; Animesh Tandon; Gerald F Greil; Suhny Abbara
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-01

3.  X-ray fused with MRI guidance of pre-selected transcatheter congenital heart disease interventions.

Authors:  Elena K Grant; Joshua P Kanter; Laura J Olivieri; Russell R Cross; Adrienne Campbell-Washburn; Anthony Z Faranesh; Ileen Cronin; Karin S Hamann; Michael L O'Byrne; Michael C Slack; Robert J Lederman; Kanishka Ratnayaka
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Influence of subcutaneous implantable defibrillators on cardiovascular magnetic resonance image quality in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Sharib Gaffar; Anthony C McCanta; Pierangelo Renella
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 5.  MRI Catheterization: Ready for Broad Adoption.

Authors:  Stephen J Nageotte; Robert J Lederman; Kanishka Ratnayaka
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 1.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.