Literature DB >> 9848749

Cardiovascular catheters and accessories: ex vivo testing of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts associated with MRI.

F G Shellock1, V J Shellock.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the MR safety of cardiovascular catheters and accessories. Intravascular cardiovascular catheters and accessories were tested for MR safety at 1.5 T using previously described techniques with respect to the evaluation of magnetic field attraction (deflection angle method), heating (temperature measured immediately before and after performing MRI), and artifacts (using a fast spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in steady state [GRASS] pulse sequence). Two devices were attracted (RV pacing lead and Oximetrix 3 SO2 optical module) by the static magnetic field. Each of the other objects displayed no attraction. Heating was +0.2 degrees C for the sample cardiovascular catheter tested (Opticath). Artifacts varied from moderate to severe, depending on the amount and type of metal present in the device. Despite these ex vivo test results, further safety consideration should be given to the cardiovascular devices that have a conductive wire component (ie, certain types of the cardiovascular catheters) because of the potential for inducing current and excessive heating in these devices during MRI, especially using a high-field-strength MR system. The cardiovascular catheters evaluated in this study or those with a similar design are not recommended for use in patients undergoing MRI procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9848749     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880080625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  6 in total

1.  Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe: in vitro and in vivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Ariel Roguin; Menekhem M Zviman; Glenn R Meininger; E Rene Rodrigues; Timm M Dickfeld; David A Bluemke; Albert Lardo; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Mutual interferences and design principles for mechatronic devices in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ningbo Yu; Roger Gassert; Robert Riener
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Optimized protocols for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with thoracic metallic implants.

Authors:  Laura J Olivieri; Russell R Cross; Kendall E O'Brien; Kanishka Ratnayaka; Michael S Hansen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-06-04

4.  Compatibility of temporary pacemaker myocardial pacing leads with magnetic resonance imaging: an ex vivo tissue study.

Authors:  Alexander Pfeil; Stefanie Drobnik; Reinhard Rzanny; Anas Aboud; Joachim Böttcher; Peter Schmidt; Christian Ortmann; Gita Mall; Khosro Hekmat; Bernhard Brehm; Juergen Reichenbach; Thomas E Mayer; Gunter Wolf; Andreas Hansch
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Invasive human magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility during revascularization in a combined XMR suite.

Authors:  Alexander J Dick; Venkatesh K Raman; Amish N Raval; Michael A Guttman; Richard B Thompson; Cengizhan Ozturk; Dana C Peters; Annette M Stine; Victor J Wright; William H Schenke; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Real-time magnetic resonance imaging - guided coronary intervention in a porcine model.

Authors:  Timo Heidt; Simon Reiss; Axel J Krafft; Ali Caglar Özen; Thomas Lottner; Christoph Hehrlein; Roland Galmbacher; Gian Kayser; Ingo Hilgendorf; Peter Stachon; Dennis Wolf; Andreas Zirlik; Klaus Düring; Manfred Zehender; Stephan Meckel; Dominik von Elverfeldt; Christoph Bode; Michael Bock; Constantin von Zur Mühlen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.