Literature DB >> 10194785

Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls.

E M Delfaut1, J Beltran, G Johnson, J Rousseau, X Marchandise, A Cotten.   

Abstract

Fat suppression is commonly used in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to suppress the signal from adipose tissue or detect adipose tissue. Fat suppression can be achieved with three methods: fat saturation, inversion-recovery imaging, and opposed-phase imaging. Selection of a fat suppression technique should depend on the purpose of the fat suppression (contrast enhancement vs tissue characterization) and the amount of fat in the tissue being studied. Fat saturation is recommended for suppression of signal from large amounts of fat and reliable acquisition of contrast material-enhanced images. The main drawbacks of this technique are sensitivity to magnetic field nonuniformity, misregistration artifacts, and unreliability when used with low-field-strength magnets. Inversion-recovery imaging allows homogeneous and global fat suppression and can be used with low-field-strength magnets. However, this technique is not specific for fat, and the signal intensity of tissue with a long T1 and tissue with a short T1 may be ambiguous. Opposed-phase imaging is a fast and readily available technique. This method is recommended for demonstration of lesions that contain small amounts of fat. The main drawback of opposed-phase imaging is unreliability in the detection of small tumors embedded in fatty tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10194785     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.19.2.g99mr03373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  87 in total

1.  MRI artifact masquerading as orbital disease.

Authors:  B A Brown; C E Swallow; A S Eiseman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Usefulness of IDEAL T2-weighted FSE and SPGR imaging in reducing metallic artifacts in the postoperative ankles with metallic hardware.

Authors:  Jung Bin Lee; Jang Gyu Cha; Min Hee Lee; Young Koo Lee; Eun Hye Lee; Chan Hong Jeon
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Proton density-weighted MR imaging of the knee: fat suppression versus without fat suppression.

Authors:  So-Yeon Lee; Won-Hee Jee; Sun Ki Kim; Jung-Man Kim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Elimination of motion and pulsation artifacts using BLADE sequences in shoulder MR imaging.

Authors:  E Lavdas; M Vlychou; E Zaloni; K Vassiou; A Tsagkalis; Z Dailiana; I Fezoulidis
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Invisible fat on CT: making it visible by MRI.

Authors:  Emre Ünal; Ali Devrim Karaosmanoğlu; Deniz Akata; Mustafa Nasuh Özmen; Muşturay Karçaaltıncaba
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  Short tau inversion recovery and proton density-weighted fat suppressed sequences for the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee with a 1.0 T dedicated extremity MRI: development of a time-efficient sequence protocol.

Authors:  Frank W Roemer; Ali Guermazi; John A Lynch; Charles G Peterfy; Michael C Nevitt; Nita Webb; Jing Li; Andreas Mohr; Harry K Genant; David T Felson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Imaging of muscle disorders in children.

Authors:  Karl Johnson; Penny J C Davis; J Katharine Foster; Janet E McDonagh; Clive A J Ryder; Taunton R Southwood
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-06-15

Review 8.  Review of key concepts in magnetic resonance physics.

Authors:  Michael M Moore; Taylor Chung
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-04-13

9.  Renal Adiposity Confounds Quantitative Assessment of Markers of Renal Diffusion With MRI: A Proposed Correction Method.

Authors:  Behzad Ebrahimi; Ahmed Saad; Kai Jiang; Christopher M Ferguson; Hui Tang; John R Woollard; James F Glockner; Stephen C Textor; Lilach O Lerman
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 10.  Magnetic Resonance-Guided Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Andrew S Mikhail; Ari Partanen; Pavel Yarmolenko; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.