Literature DB >> 20882607

Magnetic resonance imaging near metal implants.

K M Koch1, B A Hargreaves, K Butts Pauly, W Chen, G E Gold, K F King.   

Abstract

The desire to apply magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in the vicinity of embedded metallic hardware is increasing. The soft-tissue contrast available with MR techniques is advantageous in diagnosing complications near an increasing variety of MR-safe metallic hardware. Near such hardware, the spatial encoding mechanisms utilized in conventional MRI methods are often severely compromised. Mitigating these encoding difficulties has been the focus of numerous research investigations over the past two decades. Such approaches include view-angle tilting, short echo-time projection reconstruction acquisitions, single-point imaging, prepolarized MRI, and postprocessing image correction. Various technical advances have also enabled the recent development of two alternative approaches that have shown promising clinical potential. Here, the physical principals and proposed solutions to the problem of MRI near embedded metal are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20882607     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  40 in total

1.  The Contribution of Common Surgically Implanted Hardware to Functional MR Imaging Artifacts.

Authors:  A A Desai; M K Strother; C C Faraco; V L Morgan; T R Ladner; L M Dethrage; L C Jordan; M J Donahue
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Reducing metallic artefacts in post-operative spinal imaging: slice encoding for metal artefact correction with dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation MRI at 3.0 T.

Authors:  K D Song; Y C Yoon; J Park
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Fully refocused multi-shot spatiotemporally encoded MRI: robust imaging in the presence of metallic implants.

Authors:  Noam Ben-Eliezer; Eddy Solomon; Elad Harel; Nava Nevo; Lucio Frydman
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 4.  Imaging near orthopedic hardware.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Alissa J Burge; Kevin M Koch; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Accelerating fully phase-encoded MRI near metal using multiband radiofrequency excitation.

Authors:  Nathan S Artz; Curtis N Wiens; Matthew R Smith; Diego Hernando; Alexey Samsonov; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Optimized protocols for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with thoracic metallic implants.

Authors:  Laura J Olivieri; Russell R Cross; Kendall E O'Brien; Kanishka Ratnayaka; Michael S Hansen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-06-04

7.  Usefulness of metal artifact reduction with WARP technique at 1.5 and 3T MRI in imaging metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.

Authors:  Andrea Lazik; Stefan Landgraeber; Patrick Schulte; Oliver Kraff; Thomas C Lauenstein; Jens M Theysohn
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  What is the Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Component Loosening in THA?

Authors:  Alissa J Burge; Gabrielle P Konin; Jennifer L Berkowitz; Bin Lin; Matthew F Koff; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Accelerating sequences in the presence of metal by exploiting the spatial distribution of off-resonance.

Authors:  Matthew R Smith; Nathan S Artz; Kevin M Koch; Alexey Samsonov; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Characterizing the limits of MRI near metallic prostheses.

Authors:  Matthew R Smith; Nathan S Artz; Curtis Wiens; Diego Hernando; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.