Literature DB >> 18025533

Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Glenn N Levine1, Antoinette S Gomes, Andrew E Arai, David A Bluemke, Scott D Flamm, Emanuel Kanal, Warren J Manning, Edward T Martin, J Michael Smith, Norbert Wilke, Frank S Shellock.   

Abstract

Advances in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging over the past 2 decades have led to MR becoming an increasingly attractive imaging modality. With the growing number of patients treated with permanent implanted or temporary cardiovascular devices, it is becoming ever more important to clarify safety issues in regard to the performance of MR examinations in patients with these devices. Extensive, although not complete, ex vivo, animal, and clinical data are available from which to generate recommendations regarding the safe performance of MR examination in patients with cardiovascular devices, as well as to ascertain caveats and contraindications regarding MR examination for such patients. Safe MR imaging involves a careful initial patient screening, accurate determination of the permanent implanted or temporary cardiovascular device and its properties, a thoughtful analysis of the risks and benefits of performing the examination at that time, and, when indicated, appropriate physician management and supervision. This scientific statement is intended to summarize and clarify issues regarding the safety of MR imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18025533     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  94 in total

1.  Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with permanent pacemakers: a collaborative clinical approach.

Authors:  Barry Anthony Boilson; Anita Wokhlu; Nancy G Acker; Joel P Felmlee; Robert E Watson; Paul R Julsrud; Paul A Friedman; Yong-Mei Cha; Robert F Rea; David L Hayes; Win-Kuang Shen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Invisible metallic microfiber in clothing presents unrecognized MRI risk for cutaneous burn.

Authors:  J A Pietryga; M A Fonder; J M Rogg; D L North; L G Bercovitch
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  [Magnetic resonance imaging and implantable cardiac devices. Current status and future perspectives of MR-compatible systems].

Authors:  M Dorenkamp; M Roser; B Hamm; W Haverkamp
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Guidelines and the growing service burden.

Authors:  J Rod Gimbel
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  A protocol for patients with cardiovascular implantable devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): should defibrillation threshold testing be performed post-(MRI).

Authors:  Peter Thomas Burke; Hamid Ghanbari; Patrick B Alexander; Michael K Shaw; Marcos Daccarett; Christian Machado
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  Current and future role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Francisco Leyva; Paul W X Foley
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 7.  Cardiac imaging in valvular heart disease.

Authors:  W S Choo; R P Steeds
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Clinical value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with MR-conditional pacemakers.

Authors:  Claire E Raphael; Vassilis Vassiliou; Francisco Alpendurada; Sanjay K Prasad; Dudley J Pennell; Raad H Mohiaddin
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  An eight-year prospective controlled study about the safety and diagnostic value of cardiac and non-cardiac 1.5-T MRI in patients with a conventional pacemaker or a conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Lupo; Riccardo Cappato; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Secchi; Giacomo D E Papini; Sara Foresti; Hussam Ali; Guido M G De Ambroggi; Antonio Sorgente; Gianluca Epicoco; Paola M Cannaò; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Letter by Lederman et al regarding article, "MRI-induced stent dislodgment soon after left main coronary artery stenting".

Authors:  Robert J Lederman; Toby Rogers; Anthony Z Faranesh
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.