Literature DB >> 26030659

New-Generation Laser-lithographed Dual-Axis Magnetically Assisted Remote-controlled Endovascular Catheter for Interventional MR Imaging: In Vitro Multiplanar Navigation at 1.5 T and 3 T versus X-ray Fluoroscopy.

Parham Moftakhar1, Prasheel Lillaney1, Aaron D Losey1, Daniel L Cooke1, Alastair J Martin1, Bradford R H Thorne1, Ronald L Arenson1, Maythem Saeed1, Mark W Wilson1, Steven W Hetts1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of multiplanar vascular navigation with a new magnetically assisted remote-controlled (MARC) catheter with real-time magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T and to compare it with standard x-ray guidance in simulated endovascular catheterization procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 1.6-mm-diameter custom clinical-grade microcatheter prototype with lithographed double-saddle coils at the distal tip was deflected with real-time MR imaging. Two inexperienced operators and two experienced operators catheterized anteroposterior (celiac, superior mesenteric, and inferior mesenteric arteries) and mediolateral (renal arteries) branch vessels in a cryogel abdominal aortic phantom. This was repeated with conventional x-ray fluoroscopy by using clinical catheters and guidewires. Mean procedure times and percentage success data were analyzed with linear mixed-effects regression.
RESULTS: The MARC catheter tip was visible at 1.5 T and 3 T. Among inexperienced operators, MARC MR imaging guidance was not statistically different from x-ray guidance at 1.5 T (67% successful vessel selection turns with MR imaging vs 76% with x-ray guidance, P = .157) and at 3 T (75% successful turns with MR imaging vs 76% with x-ray guidance, P = .869). Experienced operators were more successful in catheterizing vessels with x-ray guidance (98% success within 60 seconds) than with 1.5-T (65%, P < .001) or 3-T (75%) MR imaging. Among inexperienced operators, mean procedure time was nearly equivalent by using MR imaging (31 seconds) and x-ray guidance (34 seconds, P = .436). Among experienced operators, catheterization was faster with x-ray guidance (20 seconds) compared with 1.5-T MR imaging (42 seconds, P < .001), but MARC guidance improved at 3 T (31 seconds). MARC MR imaging guidance at 3 T was not significantly different from x-ray guidance for the celiac (P = .755), superior mesenteric (P = .358), and inferior mesenteric (P = .065) arteries.
CONCLUSION: Multiplanar navigation with a new MARC catheter with real-time MR imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T is feasible and comparable to x-ray guidance for anteroposterior vessels at 3 T in a vascular phantom.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26030659      PMCID: PMC4671459          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  16 in total

1.  Vascular guide wire navigation with a magnetic guidance system: experimental results in a phantom.

Authors:  Mirko Schiemann; Reinmar Killmann; Martin Kleen; Nasreddin Abolmaali; Jennifer Finney; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Magnetically-assisted remote control (MARC) steering of endovascular catheters for interventional MRI: a model for deflection and design implications.

Authors:  Fabio Settecase; Marshall S Sussman; Mark W Wilson; Steven Hetts; Ronald L Arenson; Vincent Malba; Anthony F Bernhardt; Walter Kucharczyk; Timothy P L Roberts
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Magnetically-Assisted Remote Controlled Microcatheter Tip Deflection under Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Steven W Hetts; Maythem Saeed; Alastair Martin; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron Losey; Erin Jeannie Yee; Ryan Sincic; Loi Do; Lee Evans; Vincent Malba; Anthony F Bernhardt; Mark W Wilson; Anand Patel; Ronald L Arenson; Curtis Caton; Daniel L Cooke
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Comparing deflection measurements of a magnetically steerable catheter using optical imaging and MRI.

Authors:  Prasheel Lillaney; Curtis Caton; Alastair J Martin; Aaron D Losey; Leland Evans; Maythem Saeed; Daniel L Cooke; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Radiation risks of medical imaging: separating fact from fantasy.

Authors:  William R Hendee; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Magnetic catheter manipulation in the interventional MR imaging environment.

Authors:  Mark W Wilson; Alastair B Martin; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron D Losey; Erin J Yee; Anthony Bernhardt; Vincent Malba; Lee Evans; Ryan Sincic; Maythem Saeed; Ronald L Arenson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Safety of retained microcatheters: an evaluation of radiofrequency heating in endovascular microcatheters with nitinol, tungsten, and polyetheretherketone braiding at 1.5 T and 3 T.

Authors:  Aaron D Losey; Prasheel Lillaney; Alastair J Martin; Van V Halbach; Daniel L Cooke; Christopher F Dowd; Randall T Higashida; David A Saloner; Mark W Wilson; Maythem Saeed; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 5.836

8.  Magnetically assisted remote-controlled endovascular catheter for interventional MR imaging: in vitro navigation at 1.5 T versus X-ray fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Aaron D Losey; Prasheel Lillaney; Alastair J Martin; Daniel L Cooke; Mark W Wilson; Bradford R H Thorne; Ryan S Sincic; Ronald L Arenson; Maythem Saeed; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Real-time MRI-guided right heart catheterization in adults using passive catheters.

Authors:  Kanishka Ratnayaka; Anthony Z Faranesh; Michael S Hansen; Annette M Stine; Majdi Halabi; Israel M Barbash; William H Schenke; Victor J Wright; Laurie P Grant; Peter Kellman; Ozgur Kocaturk; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  System architecture for a magnetically guided endovascular microcatheter.

Authors:  Ryan S Sincic; Curtis J Caton; Prasheel Lillaney; Scott Goodfriend; Jason Ni; Alastair J Martin; Aaron D Losey; Neel Shah; Erin J Yee; Lee Evans; Vincent Malba; Anthony F Bernhardt; Fabio Settecase; Daniel L Cooke; Maythem Saeed; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.838

View more
  8 in total

1.  Design of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Magnetically Actuated Steerable Catheter.

Authors:  Taoming Liu; Nate Lombard Poirot; Tipakorn Greigarn; M Cenk Çavuşoğlu
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 0.582

2.  Endovascular MR-guided Renal Embolization by Using a Magnetically Assisted Remote-controlled Catheter System.

Authors:  Prasheel V Lillaney; Jeffrey K Yang; Aaron D Losey; Alastair J Martin; Daniel L Cooke; Bradford R H Thorne; David C Barry; Andrew Chu; Carol Stillson; Loi Do; Ronald L Arenson; Maythem Saeed; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  A 20-gauge active needle design with thin-film printed circuitry for interventional MRI at 0.55T.

Authors:  Dursun Korel Yildirim; Christopher Bruce; Dogangun Uzun; Toby Rogers; Kendall O'Brien; Rajiv Ramasawmy; Adrienne Campbell-Washburn; Daniel A Herzka; Robert J Lederman; Ozgur Kocaturk
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.737

4.  Intra-Arterial MR Perfusion Imaging of Meningiomas: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography and Intravenous MR Perfusion Imaging.

Authors:  Mark A Lum; Alastair J Martin; Matthew D Alexander; David B McCoy; Daniel L Cooke; Prasheel Lillaney; Parham Moftakhar; Matthew R Amans; Fabio Settecase; Andrew Nicholson; Christopher F Dowd; Van V Halbach; Randall T Higashida; Michael W McDermott; David Saloner; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Non-invasive qualitative and semiquantitative presurgical investigation of the feeding vasculature to intracranial meningiomas using superselective arterial spin labeling.

Authors:  Ulf Jensen-Kondering; Michael Helle; Thomas Lindner; Olav Jansen; Arya Nabavi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Electrothermally Driven Hydrogel-on-Flex-Circuit Actuator for Smart Steerable Catheters.

Authors:  Madeshwaran Selvaraj; Kenichi Takahata
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Wireless MRI-Powered Reversible Orientation-Locking Capsule Robot.

Authors:  Onder Erin; Mustafa Boyvat; Jelena Lazovic; Mehmet Efe Tiryaki; Metin Sitti
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 17.521

8.  Heat-Mitigated Design and Lorentz Force-Based Steering of an MRI-Driven Microcatheter toward Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Martin Francis Phelan; Mehmet Efe Tiryaki; Jelena Lazovic; Hunter Gilbert; Metin Sitti
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 16.806

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.