Literature DB >> 15215549

Vascular guide wire navigation with a magnetic guidance system: experimental results in a phantom.

Mirko Schiemann1, Reinmar Killmann, Martin Kleen, Nasreddin Abolmaali, Jennifer Finney, Thomas J Vogl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of a second-generation prototype magnetic guidance system in complex vessel phantoms versus conventional navigation in simulated interventional radiology procedures and to analyze procedure and fluoroscopy times.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The magnetic guidance system consists of two focused-field permanent magnets on each side of the body that create a 0.1-T navigation field and is integrated with a modified C-arm single-planar digital angiography system. Forty-nine navigations in a glass phantom and 80 navigations in a three-dimensional liver phantom were performed with a magnetically tipped floppy 0.014-inch guide wire and a conventional 0.014-inch microcatheter system. Rates of success and fluoroscopy and procedure times were quantified for both techniques. For the liver phantom experiment, the Mann-Whitney U test was used. For the glass phantom experiment, the Wilcoxon matched pair test was used with the Hodges-Lehmann estimator.
RESULTS: In the glass phantom experiments, 42 of 49 turns were successfully performed with both methods. Procedure time to reach a target did not differ significantly between methods, while fluoroscopy time was significantly different when compared with that of the magnetic guidance system (P <.01). Navigation in the liver phantom was successful in 80 of 80 turns with the magnetic guidance system and in 76 of 80 turns with conventional navigation. With the support of the magnetic guidance system, procedure time and fluoroscopy time were significantly different from those with conventional navigation (P <.001).
CONCLUSION: The magnetic guidance system allows the precise navigation of a magnetic guide wire in complex vessel phantoms with significantly shorter fluoroscopy and procedure times. Copyright RSNA, 2004

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15215549     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2322030533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  Design and construction of a multipath vessel phantom for interventional training.

Authors:  Y Thakur; H N Nikolov; I B Gulka; D W Holdsworth; M Drangova
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Magnetic versus manual guidewire manipulation in neuroradiology: in vitro results.

Authors:  T Krings; J Finney; P Niggemann; P Reinacher; N Lück; A Drexler; J Lovell; A Meyer; R Sehra; P Schauerte; M Reinges; F J Hans; A Thron
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  New-Generation Laser-lithographed Dual-Axis Magnetically Assisted Remote-controlled Endovascular Catheter for Interventional MR Imaging: In Vitro Multiplanar Navigation at 1.5 T and 3 T versus X-ray Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Parham Moftakhar; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron D Losey; Daniel L Cooke; Alastair J Martin; Bradford R H Thorne; Ronald L Arenson; Maythem Saeed; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Neuroendovascular magnetic navigation: clinical experience in ten patients.

Authors:  Guilherme Dabus; Ronald J Gerstle; Dewitte T Cross; Colin P Derdeyn; Christopher J Moran
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Telerobotic neurovascular interventions with magnetic manipulation.

Authors:  Yoonho Kim; Emily Genevriere; Pablo Harker; Jaehun Choe; Marcin Balicki; Robert W Regenhardt; Justin E Vranic; Adam A Dmytriw; Aman B Patel; Xuanhe Zhao
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2022-04-13

6.  Magnetic catheter manipulation in the interventional MR imaging environment.

Authors:  Mark W Wilson; Alastair B Martin; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron D Losey; Erin J Yee; Anthony Bernhardt; Vincent Malba; Lee Evans; Ryan Sincic; Maythem Saeed; Ronald L Arenson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Magnetically assisted remote-controlled endovascular catheter for interventional MR imaging: in vitro navigation at 1.5 T versus X-ray fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Aaron D Losey; Prasheel Lillaney; Alastair J Martin; Daniel L Cooke; Mark W Wilson; Bradford R H Thorne; Ryan S Sincic; Ronald L Arenson; Maythem Saeed; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Magnetic Soft Materials and Robots.

Authors:  Yoonho Kim; Xuanhe Zhao
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 72.087

9.  Performance of magnetic field-guided navigation system for interventional neurosurgical and cardiac procedures.

Authors:  James C H Chu; Wen Chien Hsi; Lincoln Hubbard; Yunkai Zhang; Damian Bernard; Pamela Reeder; Demetrius Lopes
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Magnetic navigation system for percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhiyong Qi; Bangwei Wu; Xinping Luo; Jun Zhu; Haiming Shi; Bo Jin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.