Literature DB >> 27019290

Endovascular MR-guided Renal Embolization by Using a Magnetically Assisted Remote-controlled Catheter System.

Prasheel V Lillaney1, Jeffrey K Yang1, Aaron D Losey1, Alastair J Martin1, Daniel L Cooke1, Bradford R H Thorne1, David C Barry1, Andrew Chu1, Carol Stillson1, Loi Do1, Ronald L Arenson1, Maythem Saeed1, Mark W Wilson1, Steven W Hetts1.   

Abstract

Purpose To assess the feasibility of a magnetically assisted remote-controlled (MARC) catheter system under magnetic resonance (MR) imaging guidance for performing a simple endovascular procedure (ie, renal artery embolization) in vivo and to compare with x-ray guidance to determine the value of MR imaging guidance and the specific areas where the MARC system can be improved. Materials and Methods In concordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocol, in vivo renal artery navigation and embolization were tested in three farm pigs (mean weight 43 kg ± 2 [standard deviation]) under real-time MR imaging at 1.5 T. The MARC catheter device was constructed by using an intramural copper-braided catheter connected to a laser-lithographed saddle coil at the distal tip. Interventionalists controlled an in-room cart that delivered electrical current to deflect the catheter in the MR imager. Contralateral kidneys were similarly embolized under x-ray guidance by using standard clinical catheters and guidewires. Changes in renal artery flow and perfusion were measured before and after embolization by using velocity-encoded and perfusion MR imaging. Catheter navigation times, renal parenchymal perfusion, and renal artery flow rates were measured for MR-guided and x-ray-guided embolization procedures and are presented as means ± standard deviation in this pilot study. Results Embolization was successful in all six kidneys under both x-ray and MR imaging guidance. Mean catheterization time with MR guidance was 93 seconds ± 56, compared with 60 seconds ± 22 for x-ray guidance. Mean changes in perfusion rates were 4.9 au/sec ± 0.8 versus 4.6 au/sec ± 0.6, and mean changes in renal flow rate were 2.1 mL/min/g ± 0.2 versus 1.9 mL/min/g ± 0.2 with MR imaging and x-ray guidance, respectively. Conclusion The MARC catheter system is feasible for renal artery catheterization and embolization under real-time MR imaging in vivo, and quantitative physiologic measures under MR imaging guidance were similar to those measured under x-ray guidance, suggesting that the MARC catheter system could be used for endovascular procedures with interventional MR imaging. (©) RSNA, 2016.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27019290      PMCID: PMC5047126          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016152036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  31 in total

1.  MR coil design for simultaneous tip tracking and curvature delineation of a catheter.

Authors:  Sven Zuehlsdorff; Reiner Umathum; Steffen Volz; Peter Hallscheidt; Christian Fink; Wolfhard Semmler; Michael Bock
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Endovascular interventional MRI.

Authors:  Christine B Henk; Charles B Higgins; Maythem Saeed
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Portable, low-cost NMR with laser-lathe lithography produced microcoils.

Authors:  Vasiliki Demas; Julie L Herberg; Vince Malba; Anthony Bernhardt; Lee Evans; Christopher Harvey; Sarah C Chinn; Robert S Maxwell; Jeffrey Reimer
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 4.  MR-guided endovascular interventions: a comprehensive review on techniques and applications.

Authors:  Sebastian Kos; Rolf Huegli; Georg M Bongartz; Augustinus L Jacob; Deniz Bilecen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Catheter-tracking FOV MR fluoroscopy.

Authors:  E Atalar; D L Kraitchman; B Carkhuff; J Lesho; O Ocali; M Solaiyappan; M A Guttman; H K Charles
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  New-Generation Laser-lithographed Dual-Axis Magnetically Assisted Remote-controlled Endovascular Catheter for Interventional MR Imaging: In Vitro Multiplanar Navigation at 1.5 T and 3 T versus X-ray Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Parham Moftakhar; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron D Losey; Daniel L Cooke; Alastair J Martin; Bradford R H Thorne; Ronald L Arenson; Maythem Saeed; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  MR-guided endovascular interventions: device visualization, tracking, navigation, clinical applications, and safety aspects.

Authors:  Frank K Wacker; Claudia M Hillenbrand; Jeffrey L Duerk; Jonathan S Lewin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.266

8.  Perfusion reduction at transcatheter intraarterial perfusion MR imaging: a promising intraprocedural biomarker to predict transplant-free survival during chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Dingxin Wang; Ron C Gaba; Brian Jin; Robert J Lewandowski; Ahsun Riaz; Khairuddin Memon; Robert K Ryu; Kent T Sato; Laura M Kulik; Mary F Mulcahy; Andrew C Larson; Riad Salem; Reed A Omary
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Characterization of the deflections of a catheter steered using a magnetic resonance imaging system.

Authors:  Frederick P Gosselin; Viviane Lalande; Sylvain Martel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  MRI in guiding and assessing intramyocardial therapy.

Authors:  M Saeed; D Saloner; O Weber; A Martin; C Henk; C Higgins
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-29       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  2 in total

1.  MRI Detectable Polymer Microspheres Embedded With Magnetic Ferrite Nanoclusters For Embolization: In Vitro And In Vivo Evaluation.

Authors:  Xiao-Ya Qin; Xiao-Xin Liu; Zi-Yuan Li; Li-Ying Guo; Zhuo-Zhao Zheng; Hai-Tao Guan; Li Song; Ying-Hua Zou; Tian-Yuan Fan
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-11-18

2.  Combined Use of X-ray Angiography and Intraprocedural MRI Enables Tissue-based Decision Making Regarding Revascularization during Acute Ischemic Stroke Intervention.

Authors:  Kazim H Narsinh; Bridget F Kilbride; Kerstin Mueller; Daniel Murph; Alexander Copelan; Jonathan Massachi; Jeffrey Vitt; Chung-Huan Sun; Himanshu Bhat; Matthew R Amans; Christopher F Dowd; Van V Halbach; Randall T Higashida; Terilyn Moore; Mark W Wilson; Daniel L Cooke; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 11.105

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.