Literature DB >> 26030171

Speakers of different languages process the visual world differently.

Sarah Chabal1, Viorica Marian1.   

Abstract

Language and vision are highly interactive. Here we show that people activate language when they perceive the visual world, and that this language information impacts how speakers of different languages focus their attention. For example, when searching for an item (e.g., clock) in the same visual display, English and Spanish speakers look at different objects. Whereas English speakers searching for the clock also look at a cloud, Spanish speakers searching for the clock also look at a gift, because the Spanish names for gift (regalo) and clock (reloj) overlap phonologically. These different looking patterns emerge despite an absence of direct language input, showing that linguistic information is automatically activated by visual scene processing. We conclude that the varying linguistic information available to speakers of different languages affects visual perception, leading to differences in how the visual world is processed. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26030171      PMCID: PMC4451606          DOI: 10.1037/xge0000075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  30 in total

1.  Synchronizing visual and language processing: an effect of object name length on eye movements.

Authors:  G J Zelinsky; G L Murphy
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-03

2.  Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  Ezequiel Morsella; Michele Miozzo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention.

Authors:  Elisabeth Moores; Liana Laiti; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Early activation of object names in visual search.

Authors:  Antje S Meyer; Eva Belke; Anna L Telling; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

5.  Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Boris New
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

6.  How language shapes thought.

Authors:  Lera Boroditsky
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.142

7.  Timing of speech and display affects the linguistic mediation of visual search.

Authors:  Eric M Chiu; Michael J Spivey
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm.

Authors:  Falk Huettig; Gerry T M Altmann
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-12-23

9.  Looking for meaning: eye movements are sensitive to overlapping semantic features, not association.

Authors:  Eiling Yee; Eve Overton; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

10.  Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  10 in total

1.  Audio-visual object search is changed by bilingual experience.

Authors:  Sarah Chabal; Scott R Schroeder; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Covert Co-Activation of Bilinguals' Non-Target Language: Phonological Competition from Translations.

Authors:  Anthony Shook; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Linguist Approaches Biling       Date:  2017-11-06

3.  Dysfunction of Rapid Neural Adaptation in Dyslexia.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Stephanie N Del Tufo; Rebecca Winter; Jack Murtagh; Abigail Cyr; Patricia Chang; Kelly Halverson; Satrajit S Ghosh; Joanna A Christodoulou; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Language is activated by visual input regardless of memory demands or capacity.

Authors:  Sarah Chabal; Sayuri Hayakawa; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2022-01-10

5.  Memory after visual search: Overlapping phonology, shared meaning, and bilingual experience influence what we remember.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; Sayuri Hayakawa; Scott R Schroeder
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Eye-tracking evidence that L2 proficiency impacts access of L1 phonotactics.

Authors:  Max R Freeman; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Stud Second Lang Acquis       Date:  2021-09-06

7.  Listening to speech and non-speech sounds activates phonological and semantic knowledge differently.

Authors:  James Bartolotti; Scott R Schroeder; Sayuri Hayakawa; Sirada Rochanavibhata; Peiyao Chen; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  When It's Harder to Ignorar than to Ignore: Evidence of Greater Attentional Capture from a Non-Dominant Language.

Authors:  Sayuri Hayakawa; Anthony Shook; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Int J Billing       Date:  2020-04-27

9.  Seeing for speaking: Semantic and lexical information provided by briefly presented, naturalistic action scenes.

Authors:  Pienie Zwitserlood; Jens Bölte; Reinhild Hofmann; Claudine C Meier; Christian Dobel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How a picture becomes a word: individual differences in the development of language-mediated visual search.

Authors:  Sarah Chabal; Sayuri Hayakawa; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-01-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.