Literature DB >> 35016119

Language is activated by visual input regardless of memory demands or capacity.

Sarah Chabal1, Sayuri Hayakawa2, Viorica Marian1.   

Abstract

In the present study, we provide compelling evidence that viewing objects automatically activates linguistic labels and that this activation is not due to task-specific memory demands. In two experiments, eye-movements of English speakers were tracked while they identified a visual target among an array of four images, including a phonological competitor (e.g., flower-flag). Experiment 1 manipulated the capacity to subvocally rehearse the target label by imposing linguistic, spatial, or no working memory load. Experiment 2 manipulated the need to encode target objects by presenting target images either before or concurrently with the search display. While the timing and magnitude of competitor activation varied across conditions, we observed consistent evidence of language activation regardless of the capacity or need to maintain object labels in memory. We propose that language activation is automatic and not contingent upon working memory capacity or demands, and conclude that objects' labels influence visual search.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive load; Language activation; Phonological competition; Visual search; Visual world paradigm; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35016119      PMCID: PMC8898262          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  42 in total

1.  How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Naomi Kenner; Megan Hyle; Nina Vasan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

3.  Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Boris New
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

Review 4.  Looking, language, and memory: bridging research from the visual world and visual search paradigms.

Authors:  Falk Huettig; Christian N L Olivers; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-09-03

5.  Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm.

Authors:  Falk Huettig; Gerry T M Altmann
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-12-23

Review 6.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Activation of phonological competitors in visual search.

Authors:  Frauke Görges; Frank Oppermann; Jörg D Jescheniak; Herbert Schriefers
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-04-10

8.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

9.  Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Mechanisms and representations of language-mediated visual attention.

Authors:  Falk Huettig; Ramesh Kumar Mishra; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-01-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.