Literature DB >> 11273419

Synchronizing visual and language processing: an effect of object name length on eye movements.

G J Zelinsky1, G L Murphy.   

Abstract

Are visual and verbal processing systems functionally independent? Two experiments (one using line drawings of common objects, the other using faces) explored the relationship between the number of syllables in an object's name (one or three) and the visual inspection of that object. The tasks were short-term recognition and visual search. Results indicated more fixations and longer gaze durations on objects having three-syllable names when the task encouraged a verbal encoding of the objects (i.e., recognition). No effects of syllable length on eye movements were found when implicit naming demands were minimal (i.e., visual search). These findings suggest that implicitly naming a pictorial object constrains the oculomotor inspection of that object, and that the visual and verbal encoding of an object are synchronized so that the faster process must wait for the slower to be completed before gaze shifts to another object. Both findings imply a tight coupling between visual and linguistic processing, and highlight the utility of an oculomotor methodology to understand this coupling.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11273419     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  19 in total

1.  Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding.

Authors:  Z M Griffin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-11

2.  Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production.

Authors:  Victor S Ferreira; Harold Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  A reversed word length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking.

Authors:  Zenzi M Griffin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

4.  The role of language in memory for actions.

Authors:  Matthew Finkbeiner; Janet Nicol; Delia Greth; Kumiko Nakamura
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-09

5.  Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.

Authors:  Orna Peleg; Lee Edelist; Zohar Eviatar; Dafna Bergerbest
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

6.  What Goes Wrong during Passive Sentence Production in Agrammatic Aphasia: An Eyetracking Study.

Authors:  Soojin Cho; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 2.773

7.  Early activation of object names in visual search.

Authors:  Antje S Meyer; Eva Belke; Anna L Telling; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

8.  Phonological similarity effects on detecting change in simple arrays.

Authors:  Stephen Mondy; Veronika Coltheart
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-12

9.  Speakers of different languages process the visual world differently.

Authors:  Sarah Chabal; Viorica Marian
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2015-06

10.  Parallel object activation and attentional gating of information: evidence from eye movements in the multiple object naming paradigm.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Victor S Ferreira; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.