Literature DB >> 15833303

Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm.

Falk Huettig1, Gerry T M Altmann.   

Abstract

When participants are presented simultaneously with spoken language and a visual display depicting objects to which that language refers, participants spontaneously fixate the visual referents of the words being heard [Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6(1), 84-107; ]. We demonstrate here that such spontaneous fixation can be driven by partial semantic overlap between a word and a visual object. Participants heard the word 'piano' when (a) a piano was depicted amongst unrelated distractors; (b) a trumpet was depicted amongst those same distractors; and (c), both the piano and trumpet were depicted. The probability of fixating the piano and the trumpet in the first two conditions rose as the word 'piano' unfolded. In the final condition, only fixations to the piano rose, although the trumpet was fixated more than the distractors. We conclude that eye movements are driven by the degree of match, along various dimensions that go beyond simple visual form, between a word and the mental representations of objects in the concurrent visual field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15833303     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  93 in total

1.  LIFG-based attentional control and the resolution of lexical ambiguities in sentence context.

Authors:  Loan C Vuong; Randi C Martin
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Bimodal bilinguals co-activate both languages during spoken comprehension.

Authors:  Anthony Shook; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-07-07

3.  Am I looking at a cat or a dog? Gaze in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia is subject to excessive taxonomic capture.

Authors:  Mustafa Seckin; M-Marsel Mesulam; Joel L Voss; Wei Huang; Emily J Rogalski; Robert S Hurley
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 1.710

4.  Lexical selection differences between monolingual and bilingual listeners.

Authors:  Deanna C Friesen; Ashley Chung-Fat-Yim; Ellen Bialystok
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Interaction between phonological and semantic representations: time matters.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-08-23

6.  Early activation of object names in visual search.

Authors:  Antje S Meyer; Eva Belke; Anna L Telling; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

7.  Lexical interference effects in sentence processing: evidence from the visual world paradigm and self-organizing models.

Authors:  Anuenue Kukona; Pyeong Whan Cho; James S Magnuson; Whitney Tabor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Developmental Timescale of Rapid Adaptation to Conflicting Cues in Real-Time Sentence Processing.

Authors:  Angele Yazbec; Michael P Kaschak; Arielle Borovsky
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01

9.  Vocabulary size and auditory word recognition in preschool children.

Authors:  Franzo Law; Tristan Mahr; Alissa Schneeberg; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2016-05-11

10.  Lexical Processing in Toddlers with ASD: Does Weak Central Coherence Play a Role?

Authors:  Susan Ellis Weismer; Eileen Haebig; Jan Edwards; Jenny Saffran; Courtney E Venker
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.