Literature DB >> 32338572

Listening to speech and non-speech sounds activates phonological and semantic knowledge differently.

James Bartolotti1,2, Scott R Schroeder3, Sayuri Hayakawa1, Sirada Rochanavibhata1, Peiyao Chen1, Viorica Marian1.   

Abstract

How does the mind process linguistic and non-linguistic sounds? The current study assessed the different ways that spoken words (e.g., "dog") and characteristic sounds (e.g., <barking>) provide access to phonological information (e.g., word-form of "dog") and semantic information (e.g., knowledge that a dog is associated with a leash). Using an eye-tracking paradigm, we found that listening to words prompted rapid phonological activation, which was then followed by semantic access. The opposite pattern emerged for sounds, with early semantic access followed by later retrieval of phonological information. Despite differences in the time courses of conceptual access, both words and sounds elicited robust activation of phonological and semantic knowledge. These findings inform models of auditory processing by revealing the pathways between speech and non-speech input and their corresponding word forms and concepts, which influence the speed, magnitude, and duration of linguistic and nonlinguistic activation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Speech comprehension; eye-tracking; phonology; psycholinguistics; semantic competition; sound processing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32338572      PMCID: PMC7923684          DOI: 10.1177/1747021820923944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  20 in total

1.  Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing.

Authors:  W R Glaser; M O Glaser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1989-03

2.  An on-line task for contrasting auditory processing in the verbal and nonverbal domains and norms for younger and older adults.

Authors:  Ayşe Pinar Saygin; Frederic Dick; Elizabeth Bates
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-02

3.  The time-course of the cross-modal semantic modulation of visual picture processing by naturalistic sounds and spoken words.

Authors:  Yi-Chuan Chen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.286

4.  How verbs can activate things: cross-language activation across word classes.

Authors:  Lisa Vandeberg; Tulio Guadalupe; Rolf A Zwaan
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-06-22

5.  Crossmodal semantic priming by naturalistic sounds and spoken words enhances visual sensitivity.

Authors:  Yi-Chuan Chen; Charles Spence
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Speakers of different languages process the visual world differently.

Authors:  Sarah Chabal; Viorica Marian
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2015-06

Review 7.  Eye movements in visual search: cognitive, perceptual and motor control aspects.

Authors:  P Viviani
Journal:  Rev Oculomot Res       Date:  1990

8.  What makes words special? Words as unmotivated cues.

Authors:  Pierce Edmiston; Gary Lupyan
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-24

9.  Characteristic sounds make you look at target objects more quickly.

Authors:  Lucica Iordanescu; Marcia Grabowecky; Steven Franconeri; Jan Theeuwes; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  CLEARPOND: cross-linguistic easy-access resource for phonological and orthographic neighborhood densities.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; James Bartolotti; Sarah Chabal; Anthony Shook
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Memory after visual search: Overlapping phonology, shared meaning, and bilingual experience influence what we remember.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; Sayuri Hayakawa; Scott R Schroeder
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 2.381

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.