Radka Stoyanova1, Felix Chinea1, Deukwoo Kwon2, Isildinha M Reis2, Yohann Tschudi1, Nestor A Parra1, Adrian L Breto1, Kyle R Padgett1, Alan Dal Pra1, Matthew C Abramowitz1, Oleksandr N Kryvenko3, Sanoj Punnen4, Alan Pollack5. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. 2. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. 3. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. 4. Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. Electronic address: APollack@med.miami.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a prostate tumor habitat risk scoring (HRS) system based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) referenced to prostatectomy Gleason score (GS) for automatic delineation of gross tumor volumes. A workflow for integration of HRS into radiation therapy boost volume dose escalation was developed in the framework of a phase 2 randomized clinical trial (BLaStM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: An automated quantitative mpMRI-based 10-point pixel-by-pixel method was optimized to prostatectomy GSs and volumes using referenced dynamic contrast-enhanced and apparent diffusion coefficient sequences. The HRS contours were migrated to the planning computed tomography scan for boost volume generation. RESULTS: There were 51 regions of interest in 12 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (26 with GS ≥7 and 25 with GS 6). The resultant heat maps showed inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity. The HRS6 level was significantly associated with radical prostatectomy regions of interest (slope 1.09, r = 0.767; P < .0001). For predicting the likelihood of cancer, GS ≥7 and GS ≥8 HRS6 area under the curve was 0.718, 0.802, and 0.897, respectively. HRS was superior to the Prostate Imaging, Reporting and Diagnosis System 4/5 classification, wherein the area under the curve was 0.62, 0.64, and 0.617, respectively (difference with HR6, P < .0001). HRS maps were created for the first 37 assessable patients on the BLaStM trial. There were an average of 1.38 habitat boost volumes per patient at a total boost volume average of 3.6 cm3. CONCLUSIONS: An automated quantitative mpMRI-based method was developed to objectively guide dose escalation to high-risk habitat volumes based on prostatectomy GS.
PURPOSE: To develop a prostate tumor habitat risk scoring (HRS) system based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) referenced to prostatectomy Gleason score (GS) for automatic delineation of gross tumor volumes. A workflow for integration of HRS into radiation therapy boost volume dose escalation was developed in the framework of a phase 2 randomized clinical trial (BLaStM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: An automated quantitative mpMRI-based 10-point pixel-by-pixel method was optimized to prostatectomy GSs and volumes using referenced dynamic contrast-enhanced and apparent diffusion coefficient sequences. The HRS contours were migrated to the planning computed tomography scan for boost volume generation. RESULTS: There were 51 regions of interest in 12 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (26 with GS ≥7 and 25 with GS 6). The resultant heat maps showed inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity. The HRS6 level was significantly associated with radical prostatectomy regions of interest (slope 1.09, r = 0.767; P < .0001). For predicting the likelihood of cancer, GS ≥7 and GS ≥8 HRS6 area under the curve was 0.718, 0.802, and 0.897, respectively. HRS was superior to the Prostate Imaging, Reporting and Diagnosis System 4/5 classification, wherein the area under the curve was 0.62, 0.64, and 0.617, respectively (difference with HR6, P < .0001). HRS maps were created for the first 37 assessable patients on the BLaStM trial. There were an average of 1.38 habitat boost volumes per patient at a total boost volume average of 3.6 cm3. CONCLUSIONS: An automated quantitative mpMRI-based method was developed to objectively guide dose escalation to high-risk habitat volumes based on prostatectomy GS.
Authors: W James Morris; Scott Tyldesley; Sree Rodda; Ross Halperin; Howard Pai; Michael McKenzie; Graeme Duncan; Gerard Morton; Jeremy Hamm; Nevin Murray Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Radka Stoyanova; Kris Huang; Kiri Sandler; Hyungjoon Cho; Sean Carlin; Pat B Zanzonico; Jason A Koutcher; Ellen Ackerstaff Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2012-12-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: George A Tjionas; Jonathan I Epstein; Sean R Williamson; Mireya Diaz; Mani Menon; James O Peabody; Nilesh S Gupta; Dipen J Parekh; Richard J Cote; Merce Jorda; Oleksandr N Kryvenko Journal: Int J Surg Pathol Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 1.271
Authors: Sofie Isebaert; Laura Van den Bergh; Karin Haustermans; Steven Joniau; Evelyne Lerut; Liesbeth De Wever; Frederik De Keyzer; Tom Budiharto; Pieter Slagmolen; Hendrik Van Poppel; Raymond Oyen Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Finn Edler von Eyben; Timo Kiljunen; Aki Kangasmaki; Kalevi Kairemo; Rie von Eyben; Timo Joensuu Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Rodrigo Delgadillo; John C Ford; Matthew C Abramowitz; Alan Dal Pra; Alan Pollack; Radka Stoyanova Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Alan Pollack; Felix M Chinea; Elizabeth Bossart; Deukwoo Kwon; Matthew C Abramowitz; Charles Lynne; Merce Jorda; Brian Marples; Vivek N Patel; Xiaodong Wu; Isildinha Reis; Matthew T Studenski; Javier Casillas; Radka Stoyanova Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Fei Yang; John C Ford; Nesrin Dogan; Kyle R Padgett; Adrian L Breto; Matthew C Abramowitz; Alan Dal Pra; Alan Pollack; Radka Stoyanova Journal: Transl Androl Urol Date: 2018-06
Authors: Yohann Tschudi; Alan Pollack; Sanoj Punnen; John C Ford; Yu-Cherng Chang; Nachiketh Soodana-Prakash; Adrian L Breto; Deukwoo Kwon; Felipe Munera; Matthew C Abramowitz; Oleksandr N Kryvenko; Radka Stoyanova Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 4.379